Quote:
Originally Posted by frostbite911 Wow, What a race. Brilliant stuff. Nowhere near the Kimi-Schumi era of racing, but given how F1 has been the past few years, yesterday's race was something special. If this is any indication of how the 2017 season will turn out, I'm in. |
Quote:
Originally Posted by deetjohn Looks like DRS doesn't have the same effect like before and drivers had to resort to some 'organic' overtaking moves. It was hard but more enjoyable when it came off nevertheless. |
Quote:
Originally Posted by asr245 Well...overtaking seems to be back, real overtaking, not the open DRS & drive pass!
|
I am also fairly optimistic about the 2017 cars regarding close racing/ overtaking from what we have seen so far.
Some brilliant passes without DRS.

DRS is nowhere near as effective as it used to be. Looks like the driver's bravery will be rewarded with a fantastic pass.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Makin Rulesz Shame on Honda to retire both the cars  |
Alonso retired due to driveshaft failure (McLaren part).
It is understood that the LHS driveshaft was already renewed earlier in the weekend.
Possible that these faults could have been picked up if they ran more during the pre-season test or maybe the vibrations that caused the failure are PU induced.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Makin Rulesz All the credit to Alonso for taking such a dud car to so high up in the grid. |
Alonso is definitely one of the fastest drivers out there.
Drivers and fans tend to exaggerate their skills a bit.
Data does indicate that McLaren and Honda have made progress since Australia. See the quali gap to the leaders in Aus. & China. Of course the frustrations come from high expectations from the team as well as ALO.
Reliability issues are nothing new while introducing new technology in racing.
If you consider the example of TJI itself, Mercedes had issues with their Pre-Chamber Ignition and they used their 2015 Canadian GP ICE upgrade to correct it.
Ferrari had this technology introduced at the same GP and they struggled with it in 2015 and only got it sorted with ICE changes in 2016. It took them 1.5 years maturing the tech to reach Mercedes level though.
Renault has been having issues since they introduced the tech. in 2016 and they got it corrected later.
Various issues with the pre-chamber ultra-lean combustion are well known and it seems Honda are saddled with drive train torsional vibration from resonance as well on top of it.
Honda are extremely disappointed that the PU is the cause of most of the reliability/performance problems. Hesegawa san is bluntly owning up to their failings. He said to the Japanese press that they realized that they had big problems with the ICE around year end and probably that’s when they started to analyse and sort out the issues. Till they introduce an updated engine spec to solve the problems they will try to improve the performance of the current spec but I am fairly certain that the performance gap cannot be bridged by that.
Heard that Mercedes and Force India are overweight and McLaren Honda are supposed to be so far underweight that they were worried they'd have enough room for ballast to reach the minimum mandated weight.
Suspect that a lot of this weight saving has come from the PU and auxiliaries. I guess they can afford to beef up the parts now that they know what can go wrong.
