Re: Malaysian Grand Prix 2011 Quote:
Originally Posted by Newpunter I don't think Kubica could have done any better than Heidfeld this race. Nick was running 2nd and kept a faster Lewis behind him for the whole first stint. A strategic error ( his tyres were finished but the team kept him out longer waiting to see if the rain would increase ) lost him several positions after the first stint and he was lucky to get back on the podium due to Alonso's mistake and Lewis's tyres degrading towards the end. The Redbulls were anyway untouchable so I think Nick extracted the maximum out of the Renault today.
People who keep saying Kubica could have got more points for Renault seem to forget that in their 3 years racing together, Kubica beat Nick only in one season. |
Newpunter ! i very well agree to your point , as i didnt check the stats before jumping in to say RB is better than NH , here's the proof below to support your point ! I would conclude telling that RB is flashier , risk taking and always in limelight , where as NH is more of a steady , calm and cool guy . Anyways NH is a great replacement according to me !
May be 2010 stats if added below will bring RB and NH on par . what say ?
courtesy : motorsportforums.com
2007:
Points: Heidfeld 61-39
Race finishes: Heidfeld 10-6
Qualifying: Heidfeld 11-5
2008:
Points: Kubica 75-60
Race finishes: Kubica 11-7
Qualifying: Kubica 13-5
2009:
Points: Heidfeld 19-7
Race finishes: Heidfeld 11-6
Qualifying: Kubica 10-7
Total:
Points: Heidfeld 140-121
Race finishes: Heidfeld 28-23
Qualifying: Kubica 28-23 |