Mclaren rulez quoted some statistics which were from the study he gave a link to. Only that he quotes incidents where ABS increased the danger. Here are others from the same study:
Quote:
Involvements in multivehicle crashes on wet roads were significantly reduced in the cars equipped with ABS: fatal crashes were reduced by 24 percent, and nonfatal crashes by 14 percent. Fatal collisions with pedestrian and bicyclists were down a significant 27 percent with ABS. However, these reductions were offset by a statistically significant increase in the frequency of single vehicle, run-off-road crashes (rollovers or impacts with fixed objects), as compared to cars without ABS. Fatal run-off-road crashes were up by 28 percent, and nonfatal crashes by 19 percent. It is unknown to what extent this increase is a consequence of ABS, or is due to other causes. In particular, it is unknown to what extent, if any, the increase is due to incorrect responses by drivers to their ABS systems, and, if so, whether the effect is likely to persist in the future.
|
The aggravation cases due to ABS are of situations where significant steer input is made i.e. rollovers/side-impacts/run-off-road etc. This does not make the ABS inferior to non-ABS cars.
There's more data I have found regarding this and would post it. As to OP's questions, can the ABS be beaten manually by the driver? No. The ABS typically works in 20 pulses/sec and that too with precise measurements of slip and impending lock.
More on ABS later. Very nice thread.
This thread is named indicative of information on how the ABS works but the discussion is more on whether ABS can be beaten. To know whether one can manually perform better, we first need to know how it works. As someone said, ABS was invented for aircraft. To know more about how ABS came about, read this:
Anti-lock braking system - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
There's another more recent study on the effectiveness of ABS in motorvehicles, here:
http://www.monash.edu.au/muarc/repor...ectiveness.pdf
Here is an excellent article on braking and its types:
footer
It does mention that threshold braking will stop you earlier. Remember that this would only be good for a straight line dead stop. But in a panic situation, will you be able to do that? And given the varying condition of road and your own speed, how safely can you use threshold braking in an actual situation? IMO, not at all. More importantly, with threshold braking, the smallest requirement of steer input may need you to leave the brakes and upset your balance on re-application and the wheels may lock whereas with ABS, steer control is available with you throughout.
Another thing to keep in mind is the initial speed of commencement of braking. At lower speeds (upto around 60 kmph), the distance to stop is the shortest with the wheels locked as against ABS. But this would work only on dry, hard roads and with slightest smoothness (such as on a wet road) reducing friction would have your car skid (under aqua/hydroplaning). As the speed of initial brake application increases, effectiveness of ABS also increases.
Someone mentioned threshold braking by F1 drivers. Sure, they do it and they do it on well known, well laid tracks on vehicles optimised for such performances in situations which are already under control. In aircraft too, you have gauges showing you how much brake pressure in PSI or kg/sq cm you are applying. These things are neither available in road cars nor relevant in an emergency stop situation.