let me begin by telling you that diesel vehicles aren't that much costlier to maintain, contrary to what you've heard-at least not the new generation common rails/DIs anyway.
secondly, like i've mentioned before, the diesel would be the ideal choice, as it's more easy to drive under loaded (stop and go or highway driving) conditions; like GTO said, torque is of prime importance when it comes to UVs-SUVs, MUVs and MPVs, all alike.
and also, you will not notice the difference in performance, unless you're pushing the car on expressways above 140 km/h, which i don't think you'll be doing; also, you mentioned somewhere that you'll be occassionally driven around by a driver, so the diesel will be better off for your use anyways.
and rj, i'm sure you'll agree with me that the petrol injectors are more prone to clogging and damage than diesel injectors, as impure petrol has more additives which results in gummy deposits, unlike adulterated diesel which contain particulates, that can be trapped by the filters. even in pure form, petrol has more viscosity than diesel, which is why fuel pumps in petrol cars don't use any other means of lubrication other than the fuel itself.
and also, F.E of the diesel will be greater-it helps in the long run, in case of a MPV.
it would be a different case altogether if this was a sedan we were talking about, but in case of an MPV, diesel always makes more sense; whereas, in case of a sedan, all boils down to the monthly usage, and economy, with the emphasis on performance, utility, and comfort coming in as a sidebar..
and rheman, if you are considering the cr-v, go for the tucson instead, as it's just as stylish, almost as practical, and has an all-important diesel engine, which the cr-v doesn't have even as an option. also, the tucson has the service back-up of hyundai, so 'nuff said!! |