Re: Our 2012 Spiced Up Maruti A-Star Automatic! Thanks for the great write up and the pictures. I would've liked to have gotten the 2012 A-Star AT but I wanted to take advantage of the year end discounts so I wound up booking my A-Star AT in Dec 2011 for a 20K old car exchange bonus + 20K discount + 40K for my old Dec 1996 zen from Mandovi Motors, Bangalore.
(I was always interested in getting a replacement 2nd small car and had asked around a month and even a year before about the discounts on the A-Star. It was 15K exch. bonus + 15K discount in Nov 2011 for AT and 30K exch. bonus+ 30K discount in Dec 2010).
I registered my car and took delivery in Jan 2012.
I also own a Honda City AT and we have a Chevy Spark in the family and hence can't help but compare the three.
Some observations and gripes(note that these are unfair comparisons but just made for info) I have with the A-Star AT are:
i> The car does not have enough pick-up. I find myself shifting from D-3-2 often and slightly higher speeds. At lower speeds, even 2nd gear does not have enough pick-up and it takes a long time to pick up speed. I need to downshift to L on occasion and that is a circus with the gated gear shift. The gated gear shift also makes it difficult to shift when driving if you forget which gear you're in(You need to look down at the serrations).
I think that the poor pickup may be due to the 3 cylinder engine or due to the way the engine is tuned.
ii> I cannot rest my hand on the door sill of my A-Star AT when the driver side window is down as the beading digs into my arm. Not a major issue as I almost always drive with the A/C on but one might like to drive with an arm resting on the door sill in what is marketed a a sporty car.
iii> A/C is weak. The air blowing in is just not cold enough compared to my City AT. I don't know if it's a gas issue or if the 1L, 3 cylinder engine is just too puny to drive the compressor.
Also, the blower is very noisy in the 4th position. At this position, the fan noise increases and decreases in a wavy fashion and is probably indicative of a poor quality fan used.
iv> The plastic on the outside door handles of my A-Star AT seems to be of very poor quality and has lost it's finish. Internal buttons are not that great either. The smallest layer of felt seems to have been sprayed over the rear parcel tray and I often get my hands cut on it when accessing the boot area. The car overall seems to have minor quality control issues with materials used and fittings done. Typical of maruti who sub-contracts or sources some low quality parts from smaller manufacturers or workshops.
The Spark interior materials and fittings are of better quality. However, most door slam is required to properly shut the doors on the Spark followed by my A-Star AT and my City AT.
v> Compared to the Spark, the braking on my A-Star AT is much better but is little spongy and not as linear as my City AT.
vi> Reverse gear in my A-Star AT is very enthusiastic v/s the gradual engagement on the City AT and I have to be careful to quickly step on the brake and control it once it is engaged.
vii> Shudder on the AT gear lever when moving from R to N to D and vice-versa is more pronounced in the A-Star v/s the negligible shudder in my City AT.
viii> Ride of the A-Star AT and Spark are much stiffer compared to the City AT due to firmer seat cushioning and shorter wheelbase but not bouncy. This is expected.
ix> The Spark cabin is and feels more roomier and can actually accommodate 4 and the occasional 5th person relatively comfortably as compared to the A-Star. (A Spark AT, if it existed would probably be perfect for my requirements.)
x> In terms of mileage, the Spark gives the best mileage (12-13 kmpl). The surprise here is that my City AT (8.5-10kmpl) seems to be giving more mileage than my A-Star AT (8-9 kmpl). I need to find out if there is something wrong with my car or if it is due to driving style (the A-Star AT is used by my wife).
Last edited by sydras : 11th May 2012 at 01:05.
|