![]() |
Originally Posted by mashmash
(Post 2332247)
Yes, the cost is almost the same. However, I have been hearing stories of side wall damage in Michelin tires. Agree, XM1+ are amazing tires with better grip and noise levels, I doubt their longevity compared to Apollo. However, thanks for the tip, will surely keep it in mind when I am shopping.MaSh |
Originally Posted by joshguy
(Post 2339266)
I Am in a great dilemma on whether to go for Bridgestone or Michellin or Apollo Please suggest i i can run two in 165 and two in 185 for say 2 or 3 months? and which one to go for? |
Originally Posted by tsk1979
(Post 2335884)
Nikhil Acelere sportz or something is soft, I use the normal acelere on the indica for quite some time, and its significantly hard, though not as hard as the standard JK/MRF stuff |
Originally Posted by Skyline GT-R
(Post 2337639)
I have used 2 sets of Michelin XM1+ (Made in Thailand) (1) 145/80R12 (45K Kms) & (2) 155/70R12 (10K Kms) which is the present tyre in my M800. Drove for 21 days around India in various conditions in a single trip lasting close to 7K Kms. After running 45K Kms i sold the 145s for 750/- apiece because much tread was left in it. Not a single puncture or pressure loss in the whole life of the tyre. But nowadays many Michelins sold in India are mfd in China & i cannot comment on their quality because i have not used them. |
Originally Posted by joshguy
(Post 2339266)
I Am in a great dilemma on whether to go for Bridgestone or Michellin or Apollo I have a swift which has run 41k kms and two tires which were earlier doing their duty in front are now at back are BAD.Front ones are ok and will run for another 3 k kms or so. Now i need have a plan but dont know if it right,change two tires to 185/65/R14 instead of 165/80/R14 (stock) now and after 3k kms change the other three to 185's. By doing this i think both will get worn out at the same time during their life time, Please suggest i i can run two in 165 and two in 185 for say 2 or 3 months? and which one to go for? |
Originally Posted by kaushikkrishnan
(Post 2339300)
I do know how it makes sense but the Tata Nano comes with two different sizes for the front and the back and is intended to run all its life on that I would prefer changing all the tyres together though as you will have the same pattern and wear and tear and can be rotated more easily later on (if you do about 5000 kms in 3 months thats a 15% worn tyre that you will have) |
Originally Posted by Nikhilb2008
(Post 2339870)
An iPhone is also made in China. So is pretty much every camera out in the market. However, you would still trust the brand Apple, Sony, Canon or whatever right? Same with tyres. Even though it's made in China, they are the same quality as what Michelin makes anywhere else in the world. If a dealer tries this bullshit on you (Sir, Michelin is made in China and is bad quality), run away from that dealer! He is not being honest and trying to hoodwink you. |
Originally Posted by Nikhilb2008
(Post 2339870)
I agree. Go for all 4 at the same time. |
Originally Posted by greenhorn
(Post 2340024)
But wouldnt that upset the handling?(i'm guessing more oversteer) I dont think tata would take such an important decision without good reason |
Originally Posted by joshguy
(Post 2339266)
Please suggest i i can run two in 165 and two in 185 for say 2 or 3 months? and which one to go for? |
Originally Posted by greenhorn
(Post 2340024)
But wouldnt that upset the handling?(i'm guessing more oversteer) I dont think tata would take such an important decision without good reason |
Originally Posted by Nikhilb2008
(Post 2339870)
...The Michelin XM1+ is actually harder than the Acelere... |
Originally Posted by dhanushs
(Post 2340049)
I would advise you not to, as the car will show very different handling characteristics. I'm sorry if I did not get you correctly, but arnt there enough cars with different sized front and rear OEM tyres?. Or is it something different that you are trying to say? :) |
165's up front and 185's at the back IMO will effect in an uneasy oversteer. But, is in any way better than a unexpected oversteer. |
Originally Posted by greenhorn
(Post 2340238)
...What you've said above was what i was trying to say, but you put it down better ... |
Originally Posted by greenhorn
(Post 2340238)
You meant uneasy understeer right ? |
Originally Posted by greenhorn
(Post 2340238)
....the OP wanted to use the same size on all four tyres... |
Originally Posted by Skyline GT-R
(Post 2339981)
iPhone/Sony/Apple/Canon does not need brake with 4 lives on it @ 140 kmph without skidding. I used to export Chinese tyres from Dubai to Africa & know about their durability (or lack of it) hands on. Nankang tyres are actually Yokohamas (older Yoko technology) made in China. Which one would someone prefer if money was not an issue? It's actually me who told my multi-brand tyre dealer "Sir, Michelin is made in China and is bad quality, I prefer Bridgestone" I have had many bad experiences with Chinese tyres but somehow Tyres Made in Thailand/Indonesia (Sime, Siamtyre, GT etc) seems to last longer (never used personally) with very less warranty claims coming back to me. Michelin truck tyres Made in PRC are a joke. If you need details, pls PM me because i don't want to defame my favourite tyre brand on a forum. |
Originally Posted by greenhorn
(Post 2340024)
But wouldnt that upset the handling?(i'm guessing more oversteer) I dont think tata would take such an important decision without good reason |
Originally Posted by dhanushs
(Post 2340124)
Nikhil, I think the XM1+ has harder thread, but the sidewall remains soft. |
All times are GMT +5.5. The time now is 04:23. |