Ok. Here is the full story. And yes, I have very strong opinions.
Every tyre SOLD in India, irrespective of WHERE it is manufactured MUST have an ISI mark from May 17th(not 1st).
As usual, all the tyre companies have filed a case in court(dont know if it is SC or something lower). They want the date to be postponed.
Now, BIS (bureau of Indian standards) gets a small amount for EVERY tyre that has the ISI mark. So, this is huge income for the govt which they can then spend on their own security and useless monuments and memorials.
Also, the BIS officials have to be taken on a tour of the factory where the tyre is going to be made. Then on inspecting the factory, they will approve that factory and allow them to use the ISI stamp to emboss on the tyres manufactured in THAT factory alone!
So, for example, Michelin will have to take these babus to China, Thailand, Indonesia, Philippines and the US. It's an all expenses paid trip for these people who think of such ridiculous schemes.
Michelin has decided they will not take them to the US plant. So, obviously Michelin will not be able to import tyres made in the US into India. And the tyres that are made in US are BFG SUV tyres and the LTX tyres for SUVs. They want to shift the production of these tyres to Thailand or China. So, dont expect Michelin LTX in 235/70 R16 for at least 3 more months.
And let's be honest. We all know that the tyre companies are going to pay huge bribes to these corrupt officials so that they can the approval and start manufacturing tyres with the ISI mark.
As of now, there are a few sizes in Michelin which already have the ISI mark. 145/80 R12 is an example.
Now, Yokohama, Continental, etc... will also have to do something similar and that is why Continental's shipments are massively delayed. They are holding off importing tyres because even if the courts rule that May 17th is too early and postpone it, tyre companies will eventually HAVE to manufacture tyres with the ISI mark. So, they are holding off imports and have started the process to manufacture tyres with the ISI mark.
Yokohama on the other hand are continuing to import their tyres by the container. Their strategy is different. They are betting heavily on the fact that the May 17th deadlin WILL be postponed. So, they have enough supplies to last them for another 3-4 months. By that time, the BIS officials would have been taken on a full tour and paid off properly and they would have started manufacturing ISI branded tyres. \
If however, the May 17th deadline is upheld, then they lose terribly.
Now, coming to the companies that manufacture in India. Many of them are still making tyres without the ISI mark. They are all betting on the deadline being postponed.
This whole ISI mark thing is completely pointless in my opinion.
BIS is supposed to ensure the quality of a product being sold in India. the ISI mark on a product implies that it has been tested by the BIS and is of a certain quality.
When it comes to tyres made by these companies, there is no doubt. The factories that manufacture tyres coming into India also make tyres headed to europe, singapore, Japan, Australia, US, etc.... This whole ISI fiasco is simply disgusting.
Quote:
Originally Posted by AbhiJ I think the new rule is designed to curb imports... and safegaurd local tyre production.. |
Not true. This ISI rule has to be followed even by local manufacturers.
Also, this will not stop illegal, grey market tyres. There are millions of people who dont care about the ISI marking and will continue to buy grey market imports of Chinese tyres simply because they are cheap.
The ISI marking will not stop the Ling Longs and Ding Dongs from entering the market.
This is the reason I'm completely opposed to this ruling.