Quote:
Originally Posted by arjab You did well in choosing a competent, reliable(hopefully), spacious, safe and aesthetically good looking saloon! |
Quote:
Originally Posted by FamilyTraveller …. congratulations and wish you great ownership experience |
Quote:
Originally Posted by NarediAni7518 Well many congratulations on the new city…. Wish you many happy miles on the car. |
Quote:
Originally Posted by shancz Congratulations, finally the City comes home…… |
Quote:
Originally Posted by ss125_i10 Congratulations on your new ride and wishing many years of safe and happy riding…… |
Thank you all. I will try to update the ownership experience as and when I can.
Quote:
Originally Posted by lemedico Congratulations on your new car! I too have this exact one, in the same colour. But I regret not taking the VX. Why? Well those LED headlamps which look super premium, are just as weak when it comes to actual illumination. Don't even ask what happens when it rains. Watch out! |
Primary reason for me to choose ZX over VX was the leather seats. I do not prefer aftermarket leather seats as they don’t match the quality, fit and finish. I loved the LED set up too and was okay with the illumination during a highway drive in heavy rainfall next day after getting the delivery. I will keep a watch though!
Quote:
Originally Posted by fhdowntheline Well, I have moved from a City CVT to a Creta diesel AT, so I can safely say that the 2020 Creta is also quite a well engineered car, and most definitely rides and handles very nicely for a crossover. The City does tend to be a bit bouncy at the rear at highway speeds as it has narrow tires and a lighter chassis. In comparison, the Creta does feel a bit more plush… |
Yes, Creta drives well too and as I mentioned we did book it to try a CSUV as we had enjoyed the sedan experience. The turn of events led us to cancel the booking and go for City and I have no regrets yet. Just yesterday, we took the car to Lonavala and back – 5 adults and a kid, partially filled boot too. Maintained 90kmph on the expressway. No bounciness – checked with the rear passengers and they were quite happy. Once the car is past run in, I want to see how it behaves between 100-120kmph though I hardly maintain and drive at that speed consistently. I am sure the ride would significantly improve had I decided to upgrade to 195/55. Plan to do that when I have to replace the stock ones.
Quote:
Originally Posted by hdman Hi Sam, congratulations on your new purchase. ….Since I was contemplating on moving to the City from the Zest, could you please share things that you found better and worse during the switch? It’ll help me making a more informed decision. Thanks! |
Thanks. Here are the difference I have observed:
1. You sit a bit taller and upright in Zest. This induced a bit of body roll compared to the City. Zest has a stiff suspension too. This is major difference I experience on my everyday drive.
2. You could feel the speed humps on the Zest steering. It would vibrate. Not an issue with City at all.
3. Power (1.2 RT manual vs 1.5 iVTEC CVT), engine NVH and FE – better in City.
4. Overall seats of the City are better quality and a bit more supportive than Zest.
5. High ground clearance of the Zest compared to the City meant I could be a bit careless on road undulations and speed bumps. Not the case with City – you must watch out. Zest is more abuse friendly.
6. ICE – bass sound output is better in Zest due to the Harmon Kardon unit. In City, you have to really up the volume to feel the bass. The output from tweeters in the City are fantastic.
7. Cubby holes and storage space in City is a major upside over Zest.
8. I am addicted to the keyless entry/exit, walk away lock, all windows auto up-down and auto headlamps of the City.
9. Honda should have provided 195/55 sections for the City. The ride quality is not bad with the stock ones but it would vastly improve with the upgrade.
10. Stock horn of Zest is powerful than Honda. I upgraded the horn after delivery.