Quote:
Originally Posted by Ravindra M You mean the technology is advanced than Boeing and Airbus ? I always thought Boeing and Airbus have the financial muscles for development and deployment of all the technical advances. Can you please enlighten us more - in which technical areas of aviation Gulfstream is ahead of these giants ? Is it something like this ?- Gulfstream is like a Rolls-Royce and 747 / A380 is like a Mercedes or Neoplan bus. |
I'm afraid its not that simple, apart from the fact that I am no expert in aviation. Just an enthusiast, who happens to have his pilot's licence, I have also a couple of dozen hours of Lufthansa and CargoLux full motion 747-400 Simulator.
I don't think you can make a generic statement on who is the most advanced to start with. Every new model that comes out tends to be more advanced then the previous. So the A380 is way more advanced in just about everything then the earlier Airbusses. Same when comparing the Boeing 787 and the 777 or the 747.
There are also some fundamental differences between Airbus and Boeing, more to do with design philosophy. The Airbus FlyByWire system is fundamentally different to Boeings FBS, in terms of how you fly the plane, how it respond to pilot inputs. Discussions about what is better have been ongoing on aviation forums for as long as Airbus and Boeing have been competing. Personally I don't think there is much difference and it most likely comes down to personal preferrence. Never flown an Airbus, not even on a simulator, but I would probably prefer Boeing system, because I'm already familiar with them and they come closest to flying a non-FBW plane and that is most of flying experience.
There is one big difference betweent the Gulfstream and Airbus/Boeing in general. These sort of businessjets are considered GA (General Aviation) aircraft. In general they come under a somewhat different scheme of regulations than your typical commercial jet.
Let me give a very practical example. The (legal) use of GPS as a primary way of navigation was allowed in GA way before it was allowed and got adopted in the commercial aviation world.
It has to do, partly, with the very complex and intricate way of how these planes get certified. Even small changes can take unbelievable amounts of time and dollars. In GA its all a little easier and quicker.
By the way, even today, although most (commercial) pilots might not even know, commercial jets still don't rely on GPS per se. In most cases what shows up as a GPS position on the flight instruments is a combination of different instruments and sensor which, under normal circumstances have a very high bias towards the GPS reading.
Depending on how the Gulfstream is operated it doesn't even require a commercial licensed pilot. There is (legal) difference between carrying passengers and carrying passengers for commercial purpsoses.
On my pilots licence I can take passengers along, but I can't take passengers with me on a commercial bases.
The total size of the business GA jet market is considerable. So companies like Gulfstream, but also their suppliers can and do make very considerable investments to come up with the latest and the greatest. It's also a very competitive market, so that drive a lot of innovation.
Most of the cockpit systems on all planes get developed by specialist companies. Their kit usually gets adapted for a particular plane of course.
The other thing to bear in mind is that the sky is full of different generation planes. My beloved 747-400 has been around for decades. But the planes I pilot myself such as a Cirrus or Diamond have full glass cockpit and the 747-400 doesn't even come close to that!
Go figure what is best?!
Jeroen