Amplifier comparison

askids · 20th August 2007, 14:00

@ what price did you finally get the 75.4 for?

panky12345 · 20th August 2007, 15:01

good, how much did you pay for it?

vkhandelwal · 21st August 2007, 11:56

the item falls in genuine product without bill to save the Taxes . got it for RS 9800 with discount. I have installed it with 1204T tube woofer and my car has been JBLfyed
GTO930 Coax, GTP 607 Compos, CS1204T bass tube, GTO 75.4 Amplifier.
Amazing Sound quality and clarity... JBL rocks...

vikram18 · 21st August 2007, 14:01

Pardon me if I sound like an Ignoramus; I am in some cases. Is the 75.4 a 5-channel amplifier? If not, doesn't the bass tube need an amp as well? So, are the co-axials not amped? This is just FMI.

vkhandelwal · 21st August 2007, 14:08

Vikram 75.4 is a four channel amplifier
Amp is powering my front components(JBL 607) and subwoofer in bridged mode(2 channels used). rear speakers are connected to head unit directly. my head unit has three pre outs. I can control the subwoofer level direcly from the headunit as I am using the preout for subwoofer.

Ajaybiz · 21st August 2007, 14:46

Hi Vkhandelwal how much u paid for CS1204T, GTO607, GTO937?Even i am putting the same stuff in my car only HU is Pioneer 7950 and coax spekers are JBLGTO0637.

panky12345 · 21st August 2007, 15:53

vkhandelwal : techincally incorrect and you'll be losing your fader controls, power your rear 937s also (in parallel) with your front comps and you'll be rocking.

vkhandelwal · 21st August 2007, 16:47

how would I lose my fade control. the rear speaker are still connected to rear channel and compos are in front channel. I can still use fader control to shift the soundstage.. are you suggesting connecting both rear 937 and 607 to front channel. or adding another amp to power rear speakers?

Sam Kapasi · 21st August 2007, 18:37

Quote:

Originally Posted by vkhandelwal

Vikram 75.4 is a four channel amplifier
Amp is powering my front components(JBL 607) and subwoofer in bridged mode(2 channels used). rear speakers are connected to head unit directly. my head unit has three pre outs. I can control the subwoofer level direcly from the headunit as I am using the preout for subwoofer.

Quote:

Originally Posted by panky12345

vkhandelwal : techincally incorrect and you'll be losing your fader controls, power your rear 937s also (in parallel) with your front comps and you'll be rocking.

Why is it technically incorrect? I think it's perfect what vkhandelwal is doing.

panky12345 · 21st August 2007, 18:38

yes sir, I'm suggesting to connect both the 937 and 607 to same (front channel), your HU is NOT powerful enough to extract even 10% juice.

EDIT: SAM, I know what he is doing is PERFECT. As told above, am suggesting using both the pairs off front channels of the amp, it would be technically incorrect, cauz it'll be posing lower impedance to the amp.

vkhandelwal · 21st August 2007, 18:49

Quote:

Originally Posted by panky12345

yes sir, I'm suggesting to connect both the 937 and 607 to same (front channel), your HU is NOT powerful enough to extract even 10% juice.

EDIT: SAM, I know what he is doing is PERFECT. As told above, am suggesting using both the pairs off front channels of the amp, it would be technically incorrect, cauz it'll be posing lower impedance to the amp.

and how would this help with fader option. what if I want more sound in front than rear or vice versa. I understand that head unit was not powerful enough that's why I invested my hard earned money in purchasing the amplifier

. anyways. in future I plan to add another 2 channel amplifier and power component with that amplifer and rear with 75.4. till then if SAM says that the setup is okay I'm fine with present setup as the sound is just amazing.. waiting for input from others though

Bass&Trouble · 21st August 2007, 20:23

Sam, panky is trying to say that his way is technically incorrect, not vkhandelwal's. lol

Quote:

Originally Posted by panky12345

EDIT: SAM, I know what he is doing is PERFECT. As told above, am suggesting using both the pairs off front channels of the amp, it would be technically incorrect, cauz it'll be posing lower impedance to the amp.

Panky Bhai, it wont be technically incorrect because of lower impedance posed to the amp. The amp will comfortably handle the impedance. problem will be that the 6x9s will be louder than the comps and he wont be able to control that since there wont be a fader as you correctly pointed out.

navin · 22nd August 2007, 09:57

Quote:

Originally Posted by vkhandelwal

anyways. in future I plan to add another 2 channel amplifier and power component with that amplifer and rear with 75.4.

Why not just add a monoblock for the sub and let the 75.4 manage the front and rear? A good 2 ch. amp is not much cheaper than a decent monoblock (think Pio D510 or JBLCS 300.1).

Sam Kapasi · 22nd August 2007, 10:01

I agree. A 75.4 driving 4 speakers and a good mono driving the woofers is an excellent combo.

speedzak · 22nd August 2007, 11:05

Once an ICEr, always an ICEr!
Your current setup is great, Mr VKha....! Congrats.

You can opt for an upgrade by getting a monoblock amp and adding it for powering the sub(s). Don't get a 2channel amp unless it is a good powerful one (100+W RMS X2).
Till then, enjoy the current setup to max.

20th August 2007, 14:00	#46
askids BHPian Join Date: Dec 2006 Location: Mysore Posts: 73 Thanked: 3 Times	@ what price did you finally get the 75.4 for?
	() Thanks

20th August 2007, 15:01	#47
panky12345 Senior - BHPian Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: New Delhi Posts: 2,697 Thanked: 172 Times	good, how much did you pay for it?
	() Thanks

21st August 2007, 11:56	#48
vkhandelwal BHPian Join Date: May 2007 Location: Indore Posts: 98 Thanked: 84 Times	the item falls in genuine product without bill to save the Taxes . got it for RS 9800 with discount. I have installed it with 1204T tube woofer and my car has been JBLfyed GTO930 Coax, GTP 607 Compos, CS1204T bass tube, GTO 75.4 Amplifier. Amazing Sound quality and clarity... JBL rocks...
	() Thanks

21st August 2007, 14:01	#49
vikram18 BHPian Join Date: May 2007 Location: pune Posts: 607 Thanked: 27 Times View My Garage	Pardon me if I sound like an Ignoramus; I am in some cases. Is the 75.4 a 5-channel amplifier? If not, doesn't the bass tube need an amp as well? So, are the co-axials not amped? This is just FMI.
	() Thanks

21st August 2007, 14:08	#50
vkhandelwal BHPian Join Date: May 2007 Location: Indore Posts: 98 Thanked: 84 Times	Vikram 75.4 is a four channel amplifier Amp is powering my front components(JBL 607) and subwoofer in bridged mode(2 channels used). rear speakers are connected to head unit directly. my head unit has three pre outs. I can control the subwoofer level direcly from the headunit as I am using the preout for subwoofer.
	() Thanks

21st August 2007, 14:46	#51
Ajaybiz BANNED Join Date: Nov 2004 Location: Bangalore Posts: 1,440 Thanked: 321 Times View My Garage	Hi Vkhandelwal how much u paid for CS1204T, GTO607, GTO937?Even i am putting the same stuff in my car only HU is Pioneer 7950 and coax spekers are JBLGTO0637.
	() Thanks

21st August 2007, 15:53	#52
panky12345 Senior - BHPian Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: New Delhi Posts: 2,697 Thanked: 172 Times	vkhandelwal : techincally incorrect and you'll be losing your fader controls, power your rear 937s also (in parallel) with your front comps and you'll be rocking.
	() Thanks

21st August 2007, 16:47	#53
vkhandelwal BHPian Join Date: May 2007 Location: Indore Posts: 98 Thanked: 84 Times	how would I lose my fade control. the rear speaker are still connected to rear channel and compos are in front channel. I can still use fader control to shift the soundstage.. are you suggesting connecting both rear 937 and 607 to front channel. or adding another amp to power rear speakers?
	() Thanks

21st August 2007, 18:38	#55
panky12345 Senior - BHPian Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: New Delhi Posts: 2,697 Thanked: 172 Times	yes sir, I'm suggesting to connect both the 937 and 607 to same (front channel), your HU is NOT powerful enough to extract even 10% juice. EDIT: SAM, I know what he is doing is PERFECT. As told above, am suggesting using both the pairs off front channels of the amp, it would be technically incorrect, cauz it'll be posing lower impedance to the amp. Last edited by panky12345 : 21st August 2007 at 18:41.
	() Thanks

22nd August 2007, 10:01	#59
Sam Kapasi Distinguished - BHPian Join Date: Jul 2005 Location: Mumbai (but wat Posts: 6,939 Thanked: 2,479 Times View My Garage	I agree. A 75.4 driving 4 speakers and a good mono driving the woofers is an excellent combo.
	() Thanks

22nd August 2007, 11:05	#60
speedzak BANNED Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: India Posts: 4,346 Thanked: 28 Times	Once an ICEr, always an ICEr! Your current setup is great, Mr VKha....! Congrats. You can opt for an upgrade by getting a monoblock amp and adding it for powering the sub(s). Don't get a 2channel amp unless it is a good powerful one (100+W RMS X2). Till then, enjoy the current setup to max.
	() Thanks