![]() |
Originally Posted by karan561
(Post 3203061)
Why remap ? When you can get the 120d, As per ACI report 120d launch will follow :) |
Originally Posted by Bluebeem
(Post 3203025)
As you mentioned, AUDI is way more proactive. They're also the first ones to start manufacturing in india. |
Originally Posted by PlatzdaTurbo
(Post 3203435)
Just called up and inquired about the possibilities of the 120d arriving here from a friend working with BMW. Even they aren't sure as yet if the 120d will make it here but might know soon now. Even if it does come here though, it will be a CBU so pricing could be distinctively above the top spec 118d. 143hp/320nm though healthy are specs identical to the Skoda Laura and that has a DSG which is as good as auto-trannys get. For someone with the Skoda Laura as a daily drive ,the 120d with 184ps/380nm would make for a much more exciting proposition than the 118d. Should be an absolute hoot to drive but those looks will take some serious getting used to ! |
Originally Posted by akshay1234
(Post 3203738)
Manufacturing or assembling? As far as I know none of them manufacture, they just assemble CKDs with a few local made parts. If you are talking about the same then BMW was assembling cars here before Audi even set up their dealerships properly. Though I agree Audi is marketing well, and is offering great finance schemes and discounts which is why they are selling so well. They have also understood what the average Indian wants. |
Originally Posted by Bluebeem
(Post 3203747)
Manufacturing. They're assembling already. http://www.autogadget46.com/2013/07/...ng-in.html?m=1 http://www.carfuel.in/audi-to-start-...uring-in-india It'll be a complete game changer for the whole industry once they do. |
The luxury carmaker has made it official that it will launch the 1-Series in India on September 3, 2013. The 1-Seires will be the smallest and the least expensive BMW when it goes on sale. The car will be available in both petrol and diesel engines. BMW India is likely to offer the 1-Series with a 1.6-litre petrol and a 2-litre diesel engine.The petrol variant will be the 118i and the 118d will be the diesel variant. The latter will use the same 2-litre diesel engine as the X1 however; it will come with a different state of tune. Both the engine will be paired with an 8-speed automatic gearbox which will send power to the rear wheels. *** Unlike the Mercedes Benz A-Class which is a front-wheel drive vehicle, the 1-Series with its rear-wheel drive configuration and perfect 50:50 weight distribution, promises to offer a much more rewarding experience on the road.The 1-Seires will be imported via CKD route and then assembled at BMW's Chennai facility. It is expected to carry a base price of around Rs 21 lakh, meaning it will be competing with the A-Class head-on. |
Originally Posted by a4anurag
(Post 3203773)
Exactly! If they can increase on the localization levels without compromising on quality and reliability then it will definitely be a game changer for the industry and that sector. The overall cost of manufacturing will come down. Anurag |
Originally Posted by akshay1234
(Post 3203738)
Hope they do launch it, but for similar reasons of Merc not launching the A220cdi, I have a feeling the 120d may take a while. I hope I am proven wrong. Manufacturing or assembling? As far as I know none of them manufacture, they just assemble CKDs with a few local made parts. If you are talking about the same then BMW was assembling cars here before Audi even set up their dealerships properly. Though I agree Audi is marketing well, and is offering great finance schemes and discounts which is why they are selling so well. They have also understood what the average Indian wants. Sounds like nonsense to me man. Because if the 118d is already going to be a CKD, and the 20d engines are already assembled and used here in a few cars then why would the 120d be a CBU? Sounds like this chap doesn't know what he is talking about. EDIT - Mpower, it is the same engine. |
Originally Posted by PlatzdaTurbo
(Post 3203951)
Puzzles me as well. It also irritates me to no end. For gods sake you have the same dam engine doing duty in your very popular 3 series for ages now and its a tried and tested GOOD unit. Why in blue heavens would you not want to offer it in the same power/torque rating as the 3 ???? They are forgetting the Indian customer's fascination with the boot. He wants to get the maximum he can for his money. So even if they did offer the 1 with the same power/torque ratings i dont think it would dent 3's sales anywhere significantly !] |
Originally Posted by PlatzdaTurbo
(Post 3203951)
Puzzles me as well. It also irritates me to no end. For gods sake you have the same dam engine doing duty in your very popular 3 series for ages now and its a tried and tested GOOD unit. Why in blue heavens would you not want to offer it in the same power/torque rating as the 3 ???? Offer the 120d at a slight premium and 118d at an attractive price tag ! More variants for customers to choose from and @ 184/380, a GENUINE hot hatch !! Anyway its all bullshit until they actually act ! :Frustrati |
Originally Posted by suhaas307
(Post 3204409)
I think you've got it all wrong. BMW wants to create a clear and unambiguous distinction between their cheapest car and the cheapest sedan they sell. As you may know, our market is very sensitive and it pays to take baby steps at first. A current or prospective 320d owner will probably not take very kindly to the fact that the cheapest (hatchback) car in BMW's portfolio has the same engine that propels his sedan. The idea of a hatch having the same power rating as the sedan will put off the average 320d owner. It isn't too different from what Mercedes is doing with the A. Forget about the silly 118d and 120d, a remap should sort it out. What you should do is hope and pray that they give us the M135i with a manual transmission. Now that would be swell! |
Originally Posted by suhaas307
(Post 3204409)
I think you've got it all wrong. BMW wants to create a clear and unambiguous distinction between their cheapest car and the cheapest sedan they sell. As you may know, our market is very sensitive and it pays to take baby steps at first. A current or prospective 320d owner will probably not take very kindly to the fact that the cheapest (hatchback) car in BMW's portfolio has the same engine that propels his sedan. The idea of a hatch having the same power rating as the sedan will put off the average 320d owner. It isn't too different from what Mercedes is doing with the A. Forget about the silly 118d and 120d, a remap should sort it out. What you should do is hope and pray that they give us the M135i with a manual transmission. Now that would be swell! |
Originally Posted by Bluebeem
(Post 3204450)
Wouldn't entirely agree. The A6 ( audis largest seller) shares its engine with the passat and Q3 The A4 shares its engine with jetta n laura The 320d, 520d, X3 2.0 share the same engine. Yet 520d is the largest seller. The 530d and 730d share the same engine.. |
Originally Posted by PlatzdaTurbo
(Post 3204480)
Plonking a unit you already have in 2 of your models instead of 1 to save costs with the intent of pleasing maximum people is common sense in my as well any businessman's books. How much sense it makes to you is your problem really. RWD+ peaky petrol + manual = Fun. But where inflation is out of bounds and infrastructure is crippling practicality must sadly take a front seat. Dont you agree.. |
Originally Posted by suhaas307
(Post 3204660)
Sure you've got a point. I see no point making a hue and cry about it. If it's that much of an issue, just get a remap! ;) |
All times are GMT +5.5. The time now is 18:01. |