Team-BHP > The Indian Car Scene
Register New Topics New Posts Top Thanked Team-BHP FAQ


View Poll Results: Which is the safest hatchback?
Palio 122 49.80%
U-VA 3 1.22%
Santro 3 1.22%
Getz 12 4.90%
800 3 1.22%
Alto 1 0.41%
Estilo 0 0%
Wagon R 0 0%
Swift 85 34.69%
Indica 16 6.53%
Voters: 245. You may not vote on this poll

Closed Thread
  Search this Thread
32,042 views
Old 22nd February 2007, 14:21   #76
Senior - BHPian
 
madan80's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Santa Clara, CA
Posts: 1,360
Thanked: 80 Times

i guess one of the questions that need to be clarified in terms of "safe car" is what is the definition of safe? is it passenger safety, drive ability or factors there in. Any small car needs to be seen in an impact analysis so that we know what is the levels of safety indian customers can expect. Side impact, crumple zones etc etc. Ideally, they should make it a norm to publish, with each vehicle being released, the crash test results, so that we can decide what are the factors we want to look at.
madan80 is offline  
Old 22nd February 2007, 14:30   #77
Senior - BHPian
 
typeOnegative's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Vikhroli, Mumbai, India
Posts: 1,503
Thanked: 27 Times

What's with the influx of new members voting Palio? Is this turning into an ego issue? Guys this is a poll on a web-forum.
typeOnegative is offline  
Old 22nd February 2007, 15:12   #78
Senior - BHPian
 
finneyp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Bangalore
Posts: 2,716
Thanked: 319 Times

Hurray!!! Palio leads as the Safest hatch in India!!! Cheers!
finneyp is offline  
Old 22nd February 2007, 15:12   #79
BHPian
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Bangalore
Posts: 607
Thanked: 214 Times

@Gunbir: "I really dont get how you guys (the ones that voted for the swift) can vote a car with inherent safety flaws like poor visibility as the safest car in India."

Thats a frivolous reason.

What visibility are you referring to..I dont see any problem with the front visibility where it really matters.

A lot of people are talking about the apparent build quality and i know most of it comes from the door panels' thickness and the body thickness for which Palio is the winner. It has gone into the head somewhere that thickness and more metal means more safety

I guess we are missing the crumple zones which enable the vehicles to absorb energy and save the lives when there are collisions. This is more crucial during an impact and i have a feeling that the SWIFT may have been designed well in this aspect is it is a more modern car.

Palio is good but feel Swift is safer..my opinion strictly.

Last edited by muni : 22nd February 2007 at 15:21.
muni is offline  
Old 22nd February 2007, 15:13   #80
BHPian
 
Kool_Kid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Delhi
Posts: 165
Thanked: 15 Times

I would put my money on swift .. Since it has Rally Based Suspension . ( It was derived out of Suzuki rally car ) .
So for me Swift - Getz -> Palio -U-VA -Indica
Kool_Kid is offline  
Old 22nd February 2007, 15:34   #81
Senior - BHPian
 
Equus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Bangalore
Posts: 1,123
Thanked: 423 Times

In terms of equipment, its gotta be the Swift ZXi..
Equus is offline  
Old 22nd February 2007, 16:15   #82
BHPian
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Bengaluru
Posts: 67
Thanked: 61 Times

I think safety and thickness of metal are different things. As Muni says crumble zones are very vey important. How much of the impact can the front potion absorb rather than transfer it to cabin. I have read in the manual not to fit steel bars before the bumper, although it feels safe it would transfer the impact. Yesterday I saw a corsa had collided with a truck and frontportion (engine) was completely smashed but cabin was intact.
pach is offline  
Old 22nd February 2007, 16:20   #83
Senior - BHPian
 
clevermax's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Tvm/Amsterdam
Posts: 2,086
Thanked: 2,640 Times

Quote:
Originally Posted by srirambr View Post
Palio. And palio it is.

toppled at around 60km/h after hitting a boulder trying to avoid a oncoming tempo

we were shaken no doubt but not injured ,the car was scratched but no major structural damage.

i have seen the palio after a similar accident but the top had peeled of like they show in ice cream ad's

That's because, palios, don't tcrawl at 60's. Try toppling the indica at 90 or 100 ks and then you will know which part of you will resemble an ice cream scoop.
I have also heard about a similar incident, 2 guys in a Palio doing 120+ Kmph toppled after hitting a divider or something, and those 2 could walk away (touchwood) from the scene. Now thats what safety is. I have driven both Swift and the Palio, and I feel Palio is still a safer car. (No offense) I don't think airbags can be of that use in saving lives if one is not wearing the seatbelts.

Take any tin box, and IMO if you're wearing seatbelts, you are 60-70% more safer during a collision.
clevermax is offline  
Old 22nd February 2007, 16:21   #84
Senior - BHPian
 
typeOnegative's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Vikhroli, Mumbai, India
Posts: 1,503
Thanked: 27 Times

Quote:
Originally Posted by muni View Post
Palio is good but feel Swift is safer..my opinion strictly.
Swift with ABS + Airbags is safer.
typeOnegative is offline  
Old 22nd February 2007, 17:26   #85
Senior - BHPian
 
gunbir's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: New Delhi
Posts: 2,465
Thanked: 32 Times

Quote:
Originally Posted by RX135 View Post
I am surprised. If handling is the prime factor for you, Swift should be on the top. It probably is the best handler among the lot. Definitely better than Getz and as good as Palio if not better.
Yes, handling is a prime factor for me. Anyone from Delhi who has sat in my car during one of many such demonstrations given, can vouch for the fact that the Getz handles like a dream, and way better than the Swift. And yes, we have also compared them side by side. And I guess anyone who has been in my car can tell you I know how to test this. Once again, this is a common misconception that the swift is the best handling hatch in the country.

Quote:
Originally Posted by muni View Post
Thats a frivolous reason.
What visibility are you referring to..I dont see any problem with the front visibility where it really matters. A lot of people are talking about the apparent build quality and i know most of it comes from the door panels' thickness and the body thickness for which Palio is the winner. It has gone into the head somewhere that thickness and more metal means more safety
No! I'm not talking about front visibility. I'm talking about overall visibility. Personally, besides the RVMs I use a lot of corner of the eye visibility to ensure I don't miss a wandering cyclist or stray dog. In my experience with the Swift, I wasn't too comfortable with the tiny rear windscreen and side panes. It may be frivolous to you, but it is of concern to me.

As for thickness of sheet metal and crumple zones, I don't want to say much cuz this can go on forever. End of the day... its simple. I feel confident enough in a Getz or a Palio to make sudden maneuvers at say 130kmph. I don't in the Swift. Is that easy.

Last edited by gunbir : 22nd February 2007 at 17:39.
gunbir is offline  
Old 22nd February 2007, 18:01   #86
Senior - BHPian
 
gunbir's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: New Delhi
Posts: 2,465
Thanked: 32 Times
some fresh info

The Swift and the Getz both have a 4 star NCAP rating. But there are some subtle differences. While the Swift scores more on pedestrian safety, the Getz offers better in-car child safety.

I couldn't find any NCAP ratings for the Palio though. If someone can dig em up it would be interesting.
gunbir is offline  
Old 22nd February 2007, 18:03   #87
Senior - BHPian
 
typeOnegative's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Vikhroli, Mumbai, India
Posts: 1,503
Thanked: 27 Times

Those figures may not be applicable for India btw. Manufacturers detune everything here. And yeah, even I have not been able to dig up the Palio figures.
typeOnegative is offline  
Old 22nd February 2007, 18:27   #88
Senior - BHPian
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Bangalore
Posts: 1,441
Thanked: 65 Times

Quote:
Originally Posted by typeOnegative View Post
And yeah, even I have not been able to dig up the Palio figures.
I believe the figures will be available only for vehicles that are being sold in Europe. Palio and its variants are not sole in Europe as they are manufactured for developing countries. This is the rough idea I have.

I guess it is time we in India have actual safety ratings published in the Indian context. If Swift and Getz have been rated at 4 in Euro NCAP, I do not think it will be the same in India.

In the absence of such ratings, I guess the safety we need to check out should be the data available from the unfortunate incidents that have taken place on Indian highways at various speeds. The way a particular car has behaved during those crashes might provide us some pointers to how safe it is.

In my opinion, Palio, Getz, Indica and Swift all are pretty safe vehicles to travel in. But if you ask me which one is the safest, I will not be able to answer.
deepakhon is offline  
Old 22nd February 2007, 18:28   #89
Senior - BHPian
 
clevermax's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Tvm/Amsterdam
Posts: 2,086
Thanked: 2,640 Times

Palio has an NCAP rating 4.
The Grande Punto has a perfect 5 out of 5. Let it come to India and kill the competition like a fly swatter. ;-) Don't worry Fiat haters... Fiat marketing guys can't even sell a brand new merc at less than Rs. 10 lakhs if they are asked to do so.
clevermax is offline  
Old 22nd February 2007, 18:40   #90
BHPian
 
prabuddhadg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Mumbai
Posts: 812
Thanked: 81 Times

While it does not come with ABS and EBD and airbags, its build quality does make the Palio a very safe car. The Swift Zxi would be a close competitor, though its build does not feel as solid as a Palio's.
I did not see the Fusion in the list- I guess it is not a regular hatchback. It too is a pretty safe feeling car.
prabuddhadg is offline  
Closed Thread

Most Viewed


Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Team-BHP.com
Proudly powered by E2E Networks