Just came across this, old but the same issues and attitudes keep coming up, so:
Quote:
Originally Posted by avanishphatak The police are doing their job. Its commendable that they learnt the tricks of trade or roped in experts who can detect mods. Of course things like aftermarket HID, bullbars, engine remapping, overpowered horns, low profile tyres, exhaust manipulation, impacts either the passenger safety, or environmental factors.
Imagine doing all these in European or American countries. The DMV/ETSC will make one's life miserable. |
Quote:
Originally Posted by hserus As others pointed out, if some of these mods were tried in the USA or Germany, the car owners would be neck deep in paperwork and fines. |
Well, all of the EU is pretty much a "police state" as we used to describe places where the powers-that-be thought they could create utopias by making and enforcing endless laws the effects of which are never really measured or proven one way or the other... it is a faith-based "religion" indeed that believes we can all become good and nice and pleasant and safe by just creating more rules.
Been speaking with someone of Indian origin (a Bhpian if you must know) the past week who spent some years in Norway. Finally left, finding it excessively "sterile" - even the Norwegians and Swedes seem to recognize that for all their outward perfections they've lost something, as well, and when they want "culture" head to the immigrant sections of Oslo.
Coming to the US, it is evident that the claims quoted above are based on absolutely nothing at all. California was an exception due to the severe pollution problems there, but in many/ most other places (state-by-state laws there, not nationalized), there are no problems at all in the view of officialdom with a very wide array of vehicle mods.
Granted that there are really dumb mods out there on Indian roads, but there are also really dumb laws / rulings out there. There's a lot of ignorant, uninformed, unscientific knee-jerk lawmaking out there.
I still cannot grasp why a retired 4x4 SML ambulance, for example, cannot be refitted as a good expedition vehicle. Already has a water tank / wash basin, four cots for sleeping, storage cabinets, A/C unit, etc. Could be used very purposefully with virtually no mods at all. Only difference is that a vehicle that was once carrying injured persons is now carrying healthy ones. And that, according to the honorable PTB, would (allegedly) be dangerous!!! (moreover it would cut sales of new vehicles to manufacturers). No good technical or other reasons, except that the SC ruled it so, as far as I can see.
In the U.S. people have creatively and safely put together some amazing motorhomes out of old delivery vans, school buses, etc. You don't read news stories about these causing bad accidents. And I'd bet in India that no real studies have been done, no real statistics ever compiled relating vehicle mods to safety. What I object to is making laws without having any real basis in knowledge on which to suppose that the laws (which restrict so many level-headed, otherwise law-abiding, conscientious persons) will actually achieve the desired ends.
Meanwhile I'm still getting blinded by high-beams on 80% of the cars that pass me by at night on Indian roads, people still leave their cars parked / standing a couple feet out into the lanes of Indian National Highways, make improper turns everywhere, drive the wrong way up four-lane divided roads, throwing litter (incl. soiled diapers) from windows, etc, etc. I see this stuff literally daily, and nobody getting challaned for these things - I mean, I've seen the cops just standing watching this stuff, just keep waving people on, keep the traffic moving one way or the other, whatever.
Where does the lack of safety ACTUALLY come in? Let's see some hard data, a pie graph, Pareto chart, whatever. Not mere assumptions / impressions.
Just random laws flying out of whomever's brain (or lifted directly from whichever "developed nation") do nobody any good, and criminalize level-headed citizens who in many cases could honestly be smarter, more conscientious, and better informed than their overlords.
How many accidents have been caused by these "Ladakh carriers" on Bullets? Had a cop tell me a couple years ago that the one on my bike was illegal. I told him there were thousands out here moving everywhere, what on earth was this about? He let me go. When they complained about the loud silencer the former owner had installed, I told him I agreed completely - and told him the truth: I was trying to get a replacement but the Covid restrictions then in effect made it impossible to source one just then.
Finally got a quieter (still non-OE) one and thankfully nobody's said anything ever since.
Going by the sorts of assertions commonly made by the PTB and PIL brigade and whichever of their supporters here or elsewhere, everything but premium imported performance tyres should also be banned. Because in that case - measurably, scientifically speaking - the stopping distances (with or without ABS) of lesser quality tyres are very significantly longer, and no doubt more dangerous.
But they're not gonna do that now, are they!!!
BTW, as per the first quote above - would you mind telling me how low-profile tyres negatively effect the environment or passenger safety? To the contrary, they actually make cars more capable and safe, higher variants of the same cars here or abroad may have them available, and the only reason the OE's aren't choosing to fit them in whichever market in the first place is ride comfort and (of course) cost. But if I as an informed individual choose to sacrifice ride quality for additional safety and control, I am criminalized and heavily fined???
There are so many nonsensical and mindless contradictions out there that the whole conversation is just about a joke IMHO.
-Eric