Thanks for sharing Crazy Driver, I do have one small request though. Some of the screen shots didnt have the year end totals while others did. So it was a little difficult to compare properly. Maybe next month onwards, can we have full monthly dispatches including annual totals?
Im a little late to the party but it's not like my perspective on the dispatch figures would have brought any new year cheer to the manufacturers. The industry dispatches in November
fell by a rather disastrous 19.9% as compared to October! That's almost the equivalent of the dispatch numbers of UM Lohia, Triumph, Suzuki, Royal Enfield, Mahindra, Piaggio, Kawasaki, Harley Davidson and Bajaj (
minus the Pulsar 220, 180 and 200) for the month of October
combined. Jeez!
- Bad month for Bajaj as every bike except the venerable 100 cc Discover dispatched less units than the previous year. Among the biggies, the drop in dispatches MoM was the highest for Bajaj at 27.11%. I wouldnt want to be in the Bajaj sales team right now, gulp!
- Marginally better month for Harley Davidson on the sales figures but they ended up selling more of their entry level models (
Street 750 + Street Rod combined) than their safe to assume, more profitable, bigger bikes. So profits would be down for the month. But given the industry bloodbath in monthly dispatches, I dont think they will be complaining.
- Hero, like Bajaj, had most of their bikes suffer from lower dispatches. The Destini 125 and Karizma buck the trend. But their drop in volumes MoM (16.06%) was below the industry average so they have some breathing room in their monthly sales review meetings.
- Honda suffered lower dispatches for every model but their MoM drop was in line with the overall market.
- Bad month with Kawasaki with a 39.5% drop in dispatches and on top of it, the lowest priced Ninja 300 made up of 58% of their dispatches. Im sure they would have been happier if they sold more of their more expensive bikes instead.
- Among the mid size players, Royal Enfield would have had a relatively better month as compared to its peers. They pushed out more 500s, which are more profitable for them, in November as compared to October. And their MoM fall was only 7.16%.
- Suzuki will milk the old Hayabusa till the day BS6 norms get implemented in our country in 2020. Im sure there will still be stocks available on the last day, Suzuki India dealers will be sad to see the bike off their shelves.
- Arguably in response to the Interceptor 650, Triumph has had some aggressive schemes running on the Street Twin and managed to push their dispatches up fair bit. Can it survive the Interceptor onslaught?
- TVS needs to do something about the very competent RR310, the dispatches are at their lowest in the year. If its any consolation, their decrease in MoM dispatches percentage wise was marginally better than Bajaj (
23.23% vs 27.11% for Bajaj) but far worse than the industry average.
Quote:
Originally Posted by tarik.arora Why is Dominar down to sub 200 units? RE 650 impact (shouldn't be the case as the price difference is quite high)? Should not have been such a big disaster. |
The revised Dominar should infuse some life into it, that said Bajaj has some discounts running in the month of December so Im not sure if they dispatched more units in December towards it.
https://www.team-bhp.com/forum/motor...ml#post4514513 (Ridden: Bajaj Dominar 400) Quote:
Originally Posted by Turbanator A little OT, what will be the business model of guys running Triumph Dealerships? Doing 80-100 all over India from 15 Dealerships. High monthly rentals in all those swanky places and with the number of guys working? How do they earn and how long can they remain in the business? |
Prices of their bikes have increased substantially over the years, for example, the Street Triple is quite expensive when compared to its direct competition. So sales do help in offsetting some of their costs as well.
Quote:
Originally Posted by mohansrides If Rahul Bajaj hadn't mouthed off at the launch about selling 10000 copies of the Dominar every month, and if Bajaj hadn't run that negative campaign, then who knows; we would probably be calling the Dominar a decent success right now. |
Numbers by themselves are extremely revealing as well as extremely deceptive. Hence context is king. The only barometer we have of the Dominar's targetted success is Rahul Bajaj's quoted target. And by that measure, the Dominar is a flop in sales figures.
Now, there is a larger perspective as well. A manufacturer has to invest a huge sum of money to engineer (
in the Dominar's case, re-engineer) a motorcycle and as a business, they design and develop the bike based on numbers. The company leadership gives the development team a budget, they have a targetted monthly / annual sales figure, they work out the break even point and the month from which profits start pouring in. Based on the dismal sales figures of the Dominar, Bajaj is a long way away from their targetted profits on that platform. Im not saying its not already profitable, I would have no logical or honest way of knowing, but their targetted profits are way off from money that is currently rolling in.
So yes, selling some Dominars is better than selling no Dominars. But is it worth the investment and time Bajaj put into it?