Re: Tesla Model S - Best Safety Rating Ever! Quote:
Originally Posted by CARDEEP Hi @Ritzvxi
Thank you for the link... however, what do you expect from him otherwise. He is bound to make such statements & commitments, lest the buyers will run away.
Moreover, his/ company's commitment is bound to be on resolving the issue, & come out of the mess, when there are fire at a pace more than the Supercars & Nanos; there is a probe on the 3 fire incidents in 5 weeks; & the investors & public confidence is waning.
IMO this is as bad as Nano fire incidents, if not worst, after all these cars are not made to certain cost. |
Pleasure CARDEEP!
I agree that, Car occupants safety has to be the top most priority under any circumstance, to which Elon Says: Quote:
Our primary concern is not for the safety of the vehicle, which can easily be replaced, but for the safety of our customers and the families they entrust to our cars. Based on the Model S track record so far, you have a zero percent chance of being hurt in an accident resulting in a battery fire, but what about other types of accidents? Despite multiple high-speed accidents, there have been no deaths or serious injuries in a Model S of any kind ever. Of course, at some point, the law of large numbers dictates that this, too, will change, but the record is long enough already for us to be extremely proud of this achievement
|
Also, he cares to mentions that at some point that the stats will change, but I think isn't using the best available technological advances to ensure passenger safety the best foot forward, which Tesla has proved to have used. Below is an example of the same. Quote:
The Model S battery pack has internal firewalls between the 16 modules and a firewall between the battery pack and passenger compartment.
| From a Model S owner in Tennessee
Excerpts from the link above: Quote:
About one minute later, the message on the dashboard display read, "Please pull over safely. Car is shutting down." I was able to fully control the car the entire time and safely pulled off the left shoulder on the side of the road. I got out of the car, and started to get all my belongings out.
| Quote:
I am thankful to God that I was totally uninjured in any way from this impact. Had I not been in a Tesla, that object could have punched through the floor and caused me serious harm. From the time of impact of the object until the time the car caught fire was about five minutes. During this time, the car warned me that it was damaged and instructed me to pull over. I never felt as though I was in any imminent danger. While driving after I hit the object until I pulled over, the car performed perfectly, and it was a totally controlled situation. There was never a point at which I was anywhere even close to any flames.
| Quote:
No flames ever reached the cabin, and nothing inside was damaged. I was even able to get my papers and pens out of the glove compartment.
|
And last but not the least: Quote:
This experience does not in any way make me think that the Tesla Model S is an unsafe car. I would buy another one in a heartbeat.
Juris Shibayama, MD
|
Now I would like to comment on "Tesla's commitment on resolving the issue and coming out of the mess":
Actually here we need to know that, the fire was caused because of external factors and not due any of the Car's shortcomings.
Actions taken by Tesla and conveyed by the CEO himself:
First: Quote:
We have rolled out an over-the-air update to the air suspension that will result in greater ground clearance at highway speeds. To be clear, this is about reducing the chances of underbody impact damage, not improving safety. The theoretical probability of a fire injury is already vanishingly small and the actual number to date is zero. Another software update expected in January will give the driver direct control of the air suspension ride height transitions.
|
Second: Quote:
We have requested that the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration conduct a full investigation as soon as possible into the fire incidents. While we think it is highly unlikely, if something is discovered that would result in a material improvement in occupant fire safety, we will immediately apply that change to new cars and offer it as a free retrofit to all existing cars.
|
Third: Quote:
To reinforce how strongly we feel about the low risk of fire in our cars, we will be amending our warranty policy to cover damage due to a fire, even if due to driver error. Unless a Model S owner actively tries to destroy the car, they are covered. Our goal here is to eliminate any concern about the cost of such an event and ensure that over time the Model S has the lowest insurance cost of any car at our price point. Either our belief in the safety of our car is correct and this is a minor cost or we are wrong, in which case the right thing is for Tesla to bear the cost rather than the car buyer.
|
If this is not a commitment and effort to resolve the issue, then what is?
CARDEEP,
My reply is not to cross or correct you, but read below to understand why I care so much to compose and post such a big reply:
The whole reasoning behind the electric cars: Quote:
There is a larger issue at stake: if a false perception about the safety of electric cars is allowed to linger, it will delay the advent of sustainable transport and increase the risk of global climate change, with potentially disastrous consequences worldwide. That cannot be allowed to happen.
|
Tesla has already entered China, I am waiting for the day when Tesla starts operations in India and we have a Team-BHP style official review.
And hoping against hope that my next upgrade be a Tesla or Reva (with Tesla's level of commitment of course)
And there goes my half an hour of productivity at work! |