Quote:
Originally Posted by Shreyans_Jain The amount of damage done to the informal sections of the economy is incalculable. This sector almost exclusively driven by small businesses, a lot of whome don’t have access to formal credit facilities. They are one of the biggest employers and a major cog of the overall economy. A thriving informal economy keeps the overall consumption picture rosy even in face of headwinds. 4 years is a very optimistic assessment. The damage done in terms of jobs lost and hard earned money wiped out is worth at least a decade.
. Result? This time of the year right before the festive season is seeing empty markets, idle factories and jobless people. Such a dire situation before Diwali has never happened in the living memory of an entire generation.
The administrations can do all the creative accounting the want. Their salaries are secure. It is the common man on the street who has to bear the brunt of their stupidities and incompetence. |
Let's not romanticise the informal economy for decades our severely restrictive and idealistic labour laws has spawned this beast called the shadow economy. Some numbers to establish why it is like a weed choking the economy
1) roughly 600mn Indians are in the labour force, of which 480 mn are in the informal sector. Of the 120mn in the formal sector fully 70mn are contract labour aka informal.
The wage disparity between the two is stark. This is 2012 data though and just for perspective (if any thing the gap would be higher). Formal sector daily wages was 520 vs informal at 150. A factor of 4.5.
2) given the horribly restrictive labour laws coupled with this army of cheap labour, labour in India is treated in the most inhumane manner.
3) disguised unemployment is another chronic issue. Directly and indirectly the agri sector employs 60% of the pop and contributes 16% to the GDP. You remove the large land owners, the politicians, the Amitabh Bachchan style farmers and this drops further to around 12%. 60% contributing 12% is horribly inefficient.
4) labour efficiency - India's labour productivity growth averaged 1.6% from 1947-1980. It is at 4.5%. China by comparison is at 7% and been that way for decades, while maintaining a peak of 12-14% for a decade in between. Why is this important? Studies have proved that when labour productivity goes above 7%, GDP growth at 8%. Except a few years from 2004-10 when this climbed (and our GDP growth rates with it) it has been stagnating.
No major economy has ever transitioned into a world power with an economy and agrarian force stuck in the middle ages.
Even china from 1985-95 had severe growth pangs and crises because it did what India has failed to do to this very day. Kill the informal economy. There Deng did it almost overnight, he then followed it up with dismantling SEO's (state owned enterprises) and making it a total free market with no labour laws to speak of. Law of supply and demand (of labour) did all the talking.
Given our now reasonably efficient PDS and JAM enabled subsidy delivery, the govt has to go ahead with the steps it has been taken to do both. Very simly put, India can't truly grow with this damocles sword hanging around its neck.
Quote:
Originally Posted by V.Narayan We should make no mistake - India is facing its worst, by a very long lead, economic crises since 1947. I have a very clear memory of 1979-80, 1989-91, and a modest but clear memory of 1974 and of course 2008 which most on this forum will recall too. None of those knock downs had such a significant impact on GDP and unemployment as the present one. Most of us would struggle to determine the right basket of solutions given that we don't have a precedent. One detrimental common characteristic that 1974, 1979 and 1989-91 had was a desperate shortage of forex reserves & inflation. Those two at least we are safe from today. It is likely that 2021-22 could see a notional growth in GDP of say 7% but that would only be so as the denominator would be a seriously shrunken one. But it will be touted as an great achievement by the spin doctors just like we saw in 1980-81. Napoleon once said that an army marches on its stomach. Well voters vote on their stomach too.
Note for the OP - I'm not sure this job creation was wiped out only in the last 4 months. We were sitting on a 45-year high of unemployment several months before the lockdown. The cancer had spread much earlier. The lockdown accelerated the decline. |
Big difference here sir and increasing production and labour hiring is proof of that. Structural failures (like under Indira and worse under Rajiv) backed by insane inflation (it has even hit 20-22%) caused a severe subsistence crisis. Right now our systems can deliver basic necessities to the Majority. With the global economies opening up slowly (something expected to last 2 years) we can expect the Indian economy to match.
The policy initiatives in areas like electronics manufacturing, pharma (API) manufacturing, the infrastructure pipeline will start driving up jobs and the economy again.
During the 70's and 80's though this was never a feasible option as even with growing global economies, our policies caused a severe logjam.