Team-BHP > Shifting gears
Register New Topics New Posts Top Thanked Team-BHP FAQ


Reply
  Search this Thread
579,365 views
Old 24th January 2009, 11:51   #811
Senior - BHPian
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: New Delhi
Posts: 3,095
Thanked: 307 Times

Quote:
Originally Posted by Thad E Ginathom View Post
That goodness that spell checkers were invented.
And what might be the nature of this goodness that you speak of, Thad?!
anupmathur is offline  
Old 24th January 2009, 18:43   #812
Distinguished - BHPian
 
Thad E Ginathom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Chennai
Posts: 11,005
Thanked: 26,446 Times

Ahhh... a perfect example of the spell checker being totally unable to help when the misspelt word actually exists <Blush>

Thank goodness you spotted it!
Thad E Ginathom is offline  
Old 24th January 2009, 20:28   #813
Senior - BHPian
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: New Delhi
Posts: 3,095
Thanked: 307 Times

Thad, your relying too much on that inanimate spelling checker!
Or should that be 'you're relying ....'?
Hah! Another one of those enigmas that people cannot seem to get the hang of, LOL!
anupmathur is offline  
Old 25th January 2009, 02:30   #814
Distinguished - BHPian
 
Thad E Ginathom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Chennai
Posts: 11,005
Thanked: 26,446 Times

it's an enigma indeed!

The fact that you're relying (Uhh... how many 'L's in that? ok:- t h a t; none. ) on something leads to your reliance, but might make you less reliable.

In another thread, recently, somebody mentioned the Robin Reliant!
Thad E Ginathom is offline  
Old 25th January 2009, 03:39   #815
BHPian
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Ahmedabad
Posts: 93
Thanked: 57 Times

*doh !*
All the gentlemen here could be editors for all the english dailies in this country would make newspapers a better read : P

OT

I just read in some "diamond comics" "Billoo" ... the guy has literally translated "Meri Dahdi Banao"(hindi) -> "Make my beard"
Xeno is offline  
Old 25th January 2009, 08:19   #816
Senior - BHPian
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: New Delhi
Posts: 3,095
Thanked: 307 Times

Thad, some serious questions for you. Please help.

The usage of 'inauguration' and 'installation' in the sentences below, somehow just sounds wrong to me! Your views please.

From Outlook news magazine dated 2 Feb 2009:

Quote:
The groundswell of support for Barack Obama culminated in his inauguration as the President of the United States.
Quote:
The installation of Barack Hussein Obama as the 44th president of the United States has set off a wave of good feelings the world over.
*sigh* Will Sam ever again find time for this thread?!

Last edited by anupmathur : 25th January 2009 at 08:21.
anupmathur is offline  
Old 25th January 2009, 08:32   #817
BHPian
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Ahmedabad
Posts: 93
Thanked: 57 Times

It sounds wrong to me as well. As if the president is a software that gets installed in the white house every 5 years. Expert's opinion awaited.

Quote:
*sigh* Will Sam ever again find time for this thread?!
hehe :P after reading the Yetiblog (registered) I do not think so.
Xeno is offline  
Old 25th January 2009, 13:28   #818
Distinguished - BHPian
 
Thad E Ginathom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Chennai
Posts: 11,005
Thanked: 26,446 Times

Whilst I feel sure that the White House has had a major upgrade (not an upgradation), I am really not sure about this usage of inauguration and installation.

Installation --- I think I have heard it used in ceremonial context, so perhaps this is correct.

inauguration --- my feeling is that it would be strictly correct to use this to refer to the presidency, or his instance of that presidency, rather than to the person.

If I make it over to the bookshelf today, and manage to lift the heavy tomes, I'll post further <Blush>.

I am sorry to have to say, by the way, that the BBC website is in far greater need of good English-speaking writers and editors than are the English-language newspapers I read here. I find that very sad.
Thad E Ginathom is offline  
Old 25th January 2009, 13:41   #819
Senior - BHPian
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: New Delhi
Posts: 3,095
Thanked: 307 Times

Quote:
Originally Posted by Thad E Ginathom View Post
If I make it over to the bookshelf today, and manage to lift the heavy tomes, I'll post further <Blush>.
Please do make it to the bookshelf soon, Thad!
I find it impossible to believe that a 'person' can be installed to an office!
Equally impossible seems to be the concept of inaugurating a person!
anupmathur is offline  
Old 25th January 2009, 18:43   #820
Distinguished - BHPian
 
Thad E Ginathom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Chennai
Posts: 11,005
Thanked: 26,446 Times

From the Oxford Dictionary site:
Quote:
install (also instal)

• verb (installed, installing) 1 place or fix (equipment) in position ready for use. 2 establish in a new place, condition, or role.
My Concise Oxford from 1976 puts the definitions the other way around:
Quote:
1. Place (person in office or rank) with ceremonies...
So yes... that one is spot on!

Inaugurate, also, gets a special metion from my Concise, just for American Presidents!
Quote:
Admit (person, esp. President of US to office, etc. with ceremony...
Here's the definition from the Oxford site
Quote:
• verb 1 begin or introduce (a system, project, etc.). 2 admit formally to office. 3 officially mark the beginning or first public use of (a building, service, etc).
So it looks as if both those words, in the Obama context, get cleared with flying colours, and not only just in American usage!

You can rest tonight without worry!
Thad E Ginathom is offline  
Old 25th January 2009, 19:03   #821
Senior - BHPian
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: New Delhi
Posts: 3,095
Thanked: 307 Times

Thanks, Thad!
As is clear, this confounded language can never be mastered!
anupmathur is offline  
Old 26th January 2009, 02:11   #822
Distinguished - BHPian
 
Thad E Ginathom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Chennai
Posts: 11,005
Thanked: 26,446 Times

It can be mastered.

It is the spelling that's tough!
Thad E Ginathom is offline  
Old 9th February 2009, 20:08   #823
Senior - BHPian
 
supremeBaleno's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Chennai / Kochi
Posts: 5,546
Thanked: 2,699 Times

Quote:
Originally Posted by pankaj_sachdeva
SH is State highway and NH is National Highway
Hmm. Thanks, man. I seem to be having a problem with acronyms recently - WTPT, VOE etc and now SH/NH.

Last edited by Technocrat : 11th February 2009 at 14:52. Reason: Removing OT stuff
supremeBaleno is offline  
Old 9th February 2009, 21:31   #824
Distinguished - BHPian
 
Thad E Ginathom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Chennai
Posts: 11,005
Thanked: 26,446 Times

That might be because they are abbreviations, not acronyms!

Surprise; I think life is trying to tell you to take it a little slower
Thad E Ginathom is offline  
Old 10th February 2009, 09:14   #825
Senior - BHPian
 
supremeBaleno's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Chennai / Kochi
Posts: 5,546
Thanked: 2,699 Times

Quote:
Originally Posted by Thad E Ginathom
That might be because they are abbreviations, not acronyms!
While I would have thought (till now ie.) that both words mean the same, this is what Wikipedia has to say:

While the word abbreviation refers to any shortened form of a word or a phrase, some have used initialism or alphabetism to refer to an abbreviation formed simply from a string of initials. In 1943, Bell Laboratories coined the term acronym as the name for a word (such as SONAR) created from the first letters of each word in a series of words (such as SOund Navigation And Ranging). The terms initialism and alphabetism are neither widely used nor widely known. The term acronym is widely used to describe any abbreviation formed from initial letters.

Going by which, "acronym' seems to be perfectly correct for the terms referred by me.

Last edited by supremeBaleno : 10th February 2009 at 09:15.
supremeBaleno is offline  
Reply

Most Viewed


Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Team-BHP.com
Proudly powered by E2E Networks