Re: Carswappings.com - Car Swapping service launched in India Quote:
Originally Posted by Auto_Bot I don't quite understand the whole concept of it.
For a second, I thought this thread is about swapping duly registered cars amongst heir respective owners (cases when you wish to switch to a different vehicle and you have a person ready and willing to exchange his ride for yours). But having read the entire post as well as the website, I really don't understand the concept of it all. My doubts are as under:
1. If I've driven to a new/alien city (outside my registering authority, ofcourse !), it is a conscious choice I have made and of course, I plan to continue using my vehicle in that particular city or state with a chauffeur who has driven me down all this way anyway or drive it around personally (Wouldn't I just fly in or take a train otherwise?) ?
2. The law holds no bar on using a vehicle registered in a particular state in another for a temporary purpose (read Sec. 47, M.V. Act, 1988) (speaking purely as a lawyer here). So why would I even think about swapping my beloved ride (which has ofcourse brought me so far) with a vehicle which is alien and unknown to me, along with no antecedents about the person driving it ?
3. Besides the fact that the Donor's vehicle and chauffeur provided by him/her would be really helpful for me for my local runs around the town, what lies in it for the Donnee i.e. the person who has lent his vehicle to me and is now being driven around in mine (a vehicle of unknown history) along with a chauffeur with no idea about local demography (i.e. my chauffeur) ? What's in it for him ?
4. How do I ascertain that donor takes the same care of my vehicle as I'd prefer him to and vice-versa ?
5. Why do I need such a awkward swap to begin with ? Wouldn't I rather leave my baby home if I were to conquer unknown territories with unaware chaufferurs ?
6. All the other apprehensions fellow T-bhpians have already raised.
This concept may hold good in theory, but I see no reason why person in his right mind would opt for it. Like GTO said, the idea is a bomb and a non-starter to begin with, mostly because it makes no sense at all. |
You actually haven't got the concept right. No problem. Let me explain.
I stay in Pune. You stay in Mumbai. We both have cars WITH our own drivers. I need to visit Mumbai for a day for some important work. I travel to Mumbai by bus or train. I pre-book your car for my travel needs within the city. You send your car along-with your driver to pick me up from the railway station and take me to my desired destination. That's it.
Couple of points to note:
1. We need to decide between ourselves as for how long can I use your car and the driver. 1 hour? 4 hours? 10 hours?
2. Who will pay for the fuel?
3. Contractual agreement between members not to use this facility for any wrong doings, illegal or criminal activities.
4. No obligation on the passenger to foot the bill in case of an accident as the vehicle was driven and/or handled completely by the driver.
5. Passenger, under any circumstances, does not get to drive the car.
6. In case the owner has reservations regarding the car to be taken in certain areas, like crowded markets or gravel roads, this information needs to be shared and confirmed upfront.
7. You get to use my car along-with my driver when you travel to Pune; given that I am in Pune on the said date and time, and I have the car to spare for swapping with a fellow user.
Anyway, this looks like too much of a hassle and for a city like Mumbai, with its multiple public transport options, might not be an ideal in-city travel option. This might work in cities like Pune, where public transport is as good (or bad) as any third world African nation. Although, there is no dearth of private taxis, ready to ply you around the city comfortably. With operators like Girikand, you can even rent a car for self-drive. Why would anyone prefer this car-swapping option over existing comfortable and convenient options, remains to be seen.
Last edited by SankalpDesai : 2nd January 2014 at 17:34.
Reason: Spell check
|