Quote:
Originally Posted by getsurya as stated earlier surely for the cab segment or for tight purse strings yet need to lay hands upon an 'SUV'.
Benbsb, thank you for the pictures makes me feel my mHawk is sure an luxury over this!  |
Actually, the interiors from the SLE variant upwards are surely a zillion times better than the lower variants. Actually, in terms of interiors, the EX is almost the same as the LX, except for the power windows, etc.
I plan on checking out the EX once again, this time with a GPS device probably to check the speed in case speedo is disconnected. I may be interested in this, owing to a non flexible budget.
Quote:
Originally Posted by TaureanBull I would stick to my initial option of VLX. One can not do away with the basic needs of central locking and power windows. After Market addition would take away the initial benefits of lesser cost. |
Vis-a-vis the features offerred, the SLE is the VFM offerring, IMHO.
Quote:
Originally Posted by VeluM 80k is a significant difference, but I think the Safari LX offers much more of the basic features that make buying a 9L (OTR) SUV seem worth it.
A 40K difference is not significant, and someone intending to buy a Scorpio would (IMHO) feel that it is worth putting in that little bit more to get a significantly better engine, a better looking vehicle (not tiny looking wheels and a bare basic body), and a few creature comforts more. The image factor itself makes a difference.
Great review, yes. And  - the LX is much better value at not much more cost. |
Thanks for the kind words.
About the 40k price difference to the LX, lets not forget that this is only on the ex-showroom price. When taking the on-road price into account, there is almost half a lakh of difference in price.
Quote:
Originally Posted by GTO Damn, and I thought my Jeep was slow! The Scorpio EX has an abysmal <40 BHP power / weight ratio. That's even worse than the Tata Nano! And this, without anyone on board. I shudder to think of the performance with driver + 6 passengers. Sorry, but for the personal customer, the Scorpio LX is well worth the difference. Even the entry-level Safari with nearly double the horsepower at only 80K more is far more VFM in my opinion. |
Rush, the drivability with 3 passengers, and A/C in full blast was quite good within the city. It's at higher speeds that it's left wanting.
Also, turnign off the A/C made absolutely no difference in performance. I checkec that as well.
Quote:
Originally Posted by vid6639 If you pay 40K more you get the mHawk as well as some basic features more. That's a better vfm actually. |
I agree. For the on-road price, the difference with the LX is about 50k+.
Quote:
Originally Posted by n.devdath Does it have an immobiliser? I do not think so and that makes it even more theft prone.
The Bolero will continue to rule the roost in this segment and with a new engine/variant coming up, this will only add to its sales now.
Messy engine bay, now that is bad. Any pics of the same? |
It does come with engine immobiliser as standard.
As for the Bolero, i was told it is so much in demand that they do not even have a demo vehicle. Even that was lapped up! :O
Engine bay pic posted below.
Quote:
Originally Posted by scorpio_fan Presence of "Micro Hybrid" and absence of basic features like power windows, central locking is interesting! When M&M will know what customers want?
Picture of engine bay is missing  . |
I totally agree about the micro hybord part. First and foremost, there is nothing hybrid about that feature, and also how come they justified it over the power windows and central locking?!! Also, the Micro hybrid is there on the EX, but absent on all other variants except the VLX!
Here is the engine bay pic which i had missed earlier.
