![]() |
Originally Posted by deepaktpatil
(Post 2930542)
Dadu, pricing is the main variable that will decide fate of Storme so hold on to your horses. |
Originally Posted by rrsteer
(Post 2930548)
:OT The comment above makes little sense. It suggests that Duster was not a success and the Quanto is. As of now, it seems that Duster is a bigger success and response to Quanto is slightly tepid. |
Originally Posted by rrsteer
(Post 2930548)
:OT The comment above makes little sense. It suggests that Duster was not a success and the Quanto is. As of now, it seems that Duster is a bigger success and response to Quanto is slightly tepid. |
Originally Posted by narayan
(Post 2930596)
I think Dadu was just trying to bring in all the SUV names into one sentence to make it sound :D I wonder why no pricing info leak has happened yet. Member Akhilesh/ACM etc have lot of TATA contacts. Guys please break the suspense |
Originally Posted by lohithrao
(Post 2930637)
Practically, i feel they should remove GX and VX variant of present gen-safari and have the Storme variants start at those price tag, however to make the deal more interesting if they reduce the price of present gen-Safari and have LX variant of Storme in between LX and EX of present gen-safari, in this case it would add lots of confusion and may negatively influence the Sumo Grande, present Safari sales. Ultimately a tough call for TATA, however they should not think of discontinuing the Safari as it would still be able to rake in similar numbers as before and am not sure how many will like the "looks" of Storme, i personally dint find it appealing at all! |
Originally Posted by akhilesh51
(Post 2930658)
Single Din is here to stay. Why? I don't know. On Pure speculation, I feel that since the dashboard design did not have space for integrated system, there could be very little that Tata could do post feedbacks from testers and junta. Any inclusion of integrated system would have warranted a totally new dashboard which would bring in may complexities with vendor agreements, design changes, etc that would have pushed back the project even further. |
Originally Posted by akhilesh51
(Post 2930658)
Storme should be placed somewhere in the region you mention. The pricing will start below 10L Ex-showroom (How much? That is the surprise!). As for Storme lowest variant being placed below existing EX, I sincerely doubt. |
Originally Posted by lohithrao
(Post 2930454)
Have you gone through the initial pages on this thread? there are very clear pics and a pretty detailed review too. @rajshenoy, the review what Hari has covered is quiet Comprehensive and for sure far superior then the reviews what these automags come up with, btw dont think the Strome being too different then what was seen few months back. |
Originally Posted by smsrini
(Post 2930686)
Does it take much of engineering to rig an infotainment system like those found in BMW/Audi, with the screen ontop of the dash board, and the HU inside the console ? dont think so. Such a system would have made the dash / HU design much more appreciated / tolerable. There is a cubby hole already ontop which could be used. They should give away 2 micromax tablets instead of those screens at the back. |
A small story in this regard: In the 1970s, VW Beetle was turning into a major headache for US carmakers and the success and wide appeal of little boxy cars made americans run head over heels to find an american alternative. Many vehicles like Chevrolet Vega and AMC Gremlin came to compete with iconic little bug but failed to impress. It is at this time, Ford came out with Ford Pinto based on their then president's vision. "A model that weighed less than 2,000 pounds and that would be priced at less than $2,000". Pinto was launched in 1971 with a very european/japanese design philosophy and fuel efficient small motors. This was touted to be the ultimate answer to the supremacy of VW Beetle and Toyota imports only for something to completely kill the vehicle. During the design phase, engineers and marketing heads of Ford encountered a peculiar situation with the low slung vehicle being susceptive to suspension failures and 'risk of fuel tank damage in case of rear collisions' when the vehicle was getting ready for assembly post tests. The problem was routed to a small bolts holding the rear bumper which could potentially puncture the fuel tank in case of rear collisions causing fire. Well aware of the issue and its risks and hard pressed for meeting launch deadlines, The engineers supposedly actually calculated the legal costs in case they were sued due to faults in their vehicle and deduced that it was better to face legal cases than to stop assembly line and face immediate financial losses. The vehicle was launched with the defects in 1971. Soon, there were news from everywhere with people charring to death even in rear collisions at speeds below 50MPH. Vehicle was eventually pulled out of US Market and is dubbed as the worst product in the history of automobile. The cost calculated by Ford for Legal Cases - $49.53mil @ 200K per death + 67K per injury + $700 per vehicle repair Financial Implications of Stopping Assembly Line - $137.5mil @ $11 per vehicle Actual Losses incurred in the first Legal Case alone - $6.0mil (Initially, court ordered payment of $125mil which was then reduced by higher courts) Total Fatalities - 27 + Injuries (It was eventually pulled from market) The problem we have on hand here is far less risky. stupid: |
Originally Posted by narayan
(Post 2930688)
Akhilesh - thanks but you have added to the confusion. The EX is priced at 10.02 ex showroom Chennai for the BS4 variant. Hence I am not sure what you mean by the base version of Storme will be below 10 lakhs but not below the EX ? how is that possible ? |
Originally Posted by akhilesh51
(Post 2930783)
It is not about engineering but rather about vendor contracts. TML or any other manufacturer does not produce all components and dashboards, steering wheels and other plastic components are outsourced to ancillary vendors. |
Originally Posted by akhilesh51
(Post 2930783)
Terribly sorry for the confusion. Actually I have always considered NCR prices and Safari EX is currently priced from 9.79L here. Obviously there is expectancy to down-price current safari variants by few thousands if not more. |
Originally Posted by narayan
(Post 2930809)
Ok - So I presume they have to factor the 60-70k discount in the re-pricing. Else whats the joy in giving a 60k discount for a vehicle now and after an upgrade is launched not give the same ( if not higher discount ) so my sense on pricing is ( all are Chennai prices ) Safari Lx - 7.75 lakhs ( existing 8.3 exshowroom minus existing discount ) Safari Ex - 9.2 lakhs ( existing 10.02 exshowroom minus existing discount ) STORME LX 9.4-9.5 lakhs ( this is presumably better specced than the Ex ) LXa to 9.6 lakhs |
All times are GMT +5.5. The time now is 11:12. |