Quote:
Originally Posted by GTO ... PRICE: I still think that the Thar is well-priced. For a mere 70,000 over the Gypsy, I get a diesel engine + power steering + better ride quality. C'mon, you really can't expect a modern Jeep with a common-rail engine for less than 5.99 lakhs ex-showroom. |
Fully agree on this
BUT at this price point an A/C & HT are essential. It is the specs & the quality of fit-n-finish that makes it look overpriced.
One more point: You will struggle to find parts that Mahindra has made 'exclusively' for the Thar. It is a perfect example of reuse at it's best. So, the costs associated with developing the Thar would be quite low and hence they should have invested in A/C & Hardtop atleast with half decent interiors.
Quote:
What the Thar offers (in terms of onroad + offroad balance) simply doesn't exist in the market today.
|
Yes. That is the USP of this vehicle.
Quote:
Originally Posted by psbali ..How is the turning radius of the car?? |
The specs mention 5.25mts. We found it
very comfortable -- and that is aided by the super light & responsive power steering.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Samurai ...
PS: Some said diesel tank didn't have lock, but I see the keyhole in the diesel tank cap. |
yes, it has a proper lockable fuel cap
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jaggu ....
For me as a general buyer (keeping the offroader in me away), when i visit the showroom, i expect few things minimum, if i have to sign a cheque for 7.3 lakhs. Phew!
- Good quality interiors, either old school bare bone stuff. If thats not possible according to CMVR, give me decent plastics, similar to that comes in hatch's
- AC (make this a wish list, but still at this price??)
- Hard/er top which can be locked |
Yes. Give this an A/C & Hardtop and this thing will fly off showrooms.
Quote:
Originally Posted by 2500cc ...
@M&M: The quality of interiors, A.C and Hardtop are the deal breakers for me and I think the case is same with many of the Thar buyers (read lifestyle buyers). ... |
Yes. What you mention would be deal breakers for a LOT of lifestyle buyers. Customers in that segment
do care about the things you have mentioned. I wish some wise folks in M&M realize this and do something about it.
Quote:
Originally Posted by IronWolf 2) Did the Cat-converter or whatever it is hanging between the wheels get knocked a bit or a lot during the OTR?
3) As Solid Axle owners... did you feel the Articulation of the Thar was
a) negligibly less b) less or c) atrociously less
than the Solid Axle counterparts?
4) When is the MDi report out? .. |
2) No. not even once
3) I, personally, felt it to be less. It did not inspire confidence in doing the obstacles. The fact that IFS is there and the associated damages it can cause was always at the back of the mind.
4) No idea
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rach ... There is no other vehicle this side of 10lacs that offers, exterior looks to die for, diesel engine, 104BHP, decent highway cruise and with 90% off-road capabilities. Damn with interiors ,I for one, will buy it with closed eyes when I save enough money for this object of desire. |
Fully agree. it is a very fun to drive car. Give me A/C & Hardtop at this price point with half decent interiors and I will be in queue to make this my daily drive city car
Quote:
Originally Posted by 4x4addict ...With the suspension set up, it is best to avoid rocky tracks as the front suspension and other components will get damaged. |
Yes. The IFS would always play at the back of your mind.
Quote:
Originally Posted by SS-Traveller ...
BTW, what was that squeaking noise from? Broken wheel bearing?  |
No idea. But for sure it was not from any broken part. It felt like a typical jeep squeaking noise after an OTR :-)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Xinger ...
One question that springs to mind is - does the Thar seem a little front heavy? In this pic the front seems to be 'stooping' lower than the rear.
On the previous thread allan had mentioned that this could be because of the weight of the winch on the Adventure variant, but the stock version seems to have the same problem! Is it the weight of the engine or the IFS (or that ridiculous bullbar) which is the cause of this? |
Yes, it does stoop to the front
Quote:
Originally Posted by Somaiah88 If only M&M concentrated a little more on anthropometry and basic quality...... sad!
Some of you might say, who care about interior quality?? if it does well off-road, i will be content.
How much of off roading will you guys be doing? if you will be using the Thar as a daily commute vehicle, you are bound to be stuck in traffic and then you will notice the interior quality, the fit and finish, the poor ergonomics.
A good concept but poor planning. |
Yes. the appalling interiors will ruin ones experience of the otherwise wonderful Thar every time you will see them -- day in and out.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ricky_63 ...
So we all agrree that without an A/C & hardtop it'd not sell in the North - as the climate would not make it a viable option. Also agree that the cabin quality leaves a LOT to be desired. A LOT
Hope the M&M top honchos are listening. If you can correct that - I can assure you that you will sell the THAR in double digits a month if not more... |
If M&M addresses the weak points of this car, believe me it can be a sleeper hit and can fly of showrooms. There is a market for such a product but with good quality fit-n-finish & basic security/comfort features.
Quote:
Originally Posted by pjbiju ....If anything is worth doing, it is worth doing well or not at all. I guess BD & Team worked hard on getting the mechanicals and dynamics of the vehicle right. And they did well in that. The interiors look like they were left to the people on the assembly line to fit anything they could find. Totally disappointing interiors for a lifestyle vehicle costing so much. |
Yes, the team that worked on the mechanicals has done a good job but the interior team has single handedly managed to undo their great work -- atleast for a lot of the potential customers.
Quote:
Originally Posted by AVR .....Not sure if I understand the above correctly. Unless something is different mechanically, wouldn't bigger tyres (Adventure) have lesser clearance than the Stock version? |
Look at the pictures of the adventure & stock Thar again carefully. In the adventure version, the plastic attachments to the metal is at a level and in the stock one, the bolero fenders are attached to the metal wheel arch and they reduce the clearance. Infact, if you remove that bolero plastic fender, you will get ~2"+ of space for wheel travel.
So, this is what makes the difference in clearance..!!!