This thread had run its course, and was revived by Mr. John.
I felt that I could add some comment because some more aspects are there which one can think about.
The first thing I did was to read the thread from the beginning. So many things have happened in between which can require some consideration.
First of all, where I hope that everyone will agree, the goal is first to raise the standard of the cars themselves, followed by the judging. How do you go about it?
Only by competition!
Let me explain. You may want to raise standards, but who will foot the bill? The car owner. He has to be induced to spend the money. How? By giving him competition, by giving him good events. All other aspects will slowly fall into place.
I give my example, so that nobody could feel offended. I have this Lancia, a well known car, very photogenic, gets huge coverage in the press because of appearance. But the car was shabby. Then along comes the Cartier event, and the car is invited because it was a racing car, was actively raced in India, so there is history. I accepted the invite and set about doing something to improve the car. I had 4 good tyres on the car and 2 old stepney tyres. I got 2 new tyres from US just to have all 6 uniform. Then I got leather upholstry made properly, seats were anyway a bit worn. The car got a proper coat of paint. Only thing I did not do properly, was to detail the engine bay. That was because I relied on the mechanic as I was out of station. So I was induced into spending money on my car to be worthy of the event. But if I had not done anything, it would still have been OK as she is a looker but I would have looked a bit silly to the judges and the car would have stood out also for its shabbyness. But as I said earlier, this I did for the Cartier show.
Now, what about shows themselves? They must also be worthy for us to pump in money to make cars uptodate. So quality of show is very important. The show must give back something to the participants. When there is a VCCCI show, it is for vintage and classic cars. They rightly have several categories in which your car fits in so that it can be judged against contemporary cars. Of course a 1930's Rolls cannot be judged against an Austin of the same age, the Austin will lose out even though Pebble Beach did once have an Austin 7 doctors coupe once and it did win a prize. It was one of those things, like Slumdog with 8 Oscars though Lagaan was 100 times better, and AR Rehmans music in Rangeela was again many times better. (Just a personal opinion slipped in after seeing the movie) But then VCCCI does huge injustice to serious car owners when we have entries like W123 Mercs etc just to increase the numbers. How will the judges work when they have to judge such cars at the same time? A sensible selection of cars should be participating with a proper cut off year. VCCCI rallies are really not worth the bother to spend money to make a car upto date for. Believe me when I tell that I do not wash and service my cars when they go for VCCCI meets.
Once a car owner is induced to spend money on a car, and brings it up to good nick, then he should expect proper judging. This is where DKG has a real point, but there is no easy solution. Even international judges make errors, as happened in the Cartier event with the Lancia and its wheels. So it is not just judging whose standards are to be upped, it is the owner himself who has to sell and many times even explain his car to the judges. The owner must know his car, the history, details of the Marque and model, collect documentation. The judge may not know every aspect of your car, many times I have come across reputed personalities judging at events and making mistakes about originality. I have heard that my 1926 Fiat's engine is not original, my Zuendapp carb is not original, and we the owner and entrant have to be present and explain originality. For the Cartier event I was told by Mr. Manvendra Barwani that I should make a folder, collect anything to add to info. I researched history, visited, met and found people in Bangalore, Kolkotta, Hyderabad to get the cars history, who owned it, who drove it etc. For this I prepared a note. Then I found a photo of the car racing maybe in the 1950's. Since this thread seeks to up the standards I am revealing this so that others may follow suit if they want to. Pictures of the car as found are also very helpful.
The pages of standards put up by DKG could confuse many of us at this stage. They are correct but of too high a standard. The standards in India have to be upped gradually. The fascilities and resources which are available today were not available 10 years ago. Today we can get tyres, so a car with worn tyres must lose points on that score. On the otherhand, windshields or glasses should not be disqualified if they are not safety glasses. Locally made windshield if toughened will come with the stamp of the local glass co, it will be non original to have "Safex" glass on an American car. But they generally do not toughen glass without stamp, it is an excise offence or something like that.
Good chrome is still an issue, presently the chrome is done shortly before an event so that it looks good but some time down the line it gets bad. I have heard but never seen good chrome for large parts, say a bumper or a grill. So some allowance would be in order for "Indian" conditions. On my Humber I have original chrome, it is not perfect but will leave because it is original.
I have offered no solution, just added to the confusion. But we are clear, judging could be improved, cars need to be improved, events need to be improved. And owners also need to improve their attitude.
I can also vouch for the fact that at least in Mumbai, judging has not been impartial every time. But many owners crib very badly if they do not get a prize. Often it appears, but need not be, that prizes are fitted to please some. I believe that till we do not have improved judging, we should not give prizes at all but give all a memento. This may help in some way to avoid the formation of different camps in one city.
Better to have genuine fun at events than bitter bikering and formation of separate camps.
Cheers
Harit |