Quote:
Originally Posted by supremeBaleno That was funny. Just because they churn out crude rattlers and fume-emitting people-movers like the Sumo, Indica in the thousands which are lapped up by the taxi-segment, does it make them good at quality ? Sort of like saying that just because cheap chinese toys sell a lot, they are great in quality. |
Comparing Tata vehicles and chinese toys is like comparing apples and oranges. Chinese toys sells for a fraction of the competitors cost. That cannot be said about Tata vehicles. Toy is a very low cost buy. Car is the second most expensive buying desicion for a indian customer. Why would people buy one lakh plus indicas every year if their quality is not acceptable. Indica's being preffered car for taxis is itself a certificate for that vehicle. If you read my post carefully I have never said tata's quality is good. My question is why would people buy a manza or vista over a swift or a dzire if the quality is so bad as you say.
This is some thing GTO has said in an another thread: That said, it would be foolish to generalise all Tata cars based on a handful of examples. If 90% + of the Indicas on the road were not reliable, you would not see sales figures of a lac plus every year. Remember...word of mouth in India works wonders, and I know of plentiful Tata Indica / Indigo customers who were extremely happy customers. Quote:
Originally Posted by aaggoswami Maruti sells the maximum number of cars in the market, so does it mean that Maruti is ultimate in quality ? Alto sells a lot, so can we say its the best buy ?
IMHO, number are not perfect indicators of quality. Never, and this ( nos. is not equal to quality concept ) is applicable to all manufacturers.
Also remember that most of cars in Tata are bought as Taxi. Tata then stopped passing of Vista as taxi. |
Never did I say numbers are perfect indicators of quality. But I say numbers indicate vehicles have acceptable quality if they are sold approximately at the same price as the competition. My question is why would people buy a manza or vista over a swift or a dzire if the quality is so bad as you say. Quote:
Originally Posted by supremeBaleno Maybe. But atleast the Alto-user need not worry about his car 'n cabin catching fire. And guess what ? The Alto is 30-year old technology, but still reliable and safer than what is supposedly cutting-edge. |
I only posted the above sentence in responce to your post saying nothing great about Nano's price. Nano is still a lot cheaper than it's nearest competitor. You are the one to go OT first and I respond to it you get back to the original topic. Quote:
Originally Posted by supremeBaleno Nothing much, really.
The brother of the deceased in 1 of the reported cases alleges his brother was murdered (not a simple "car caught fire" case). The other guy was taking his car to be repaired, as per his family. What repair ? Anything serious enough to have caused the fire ? No idea.
In any case, IMO the reason these do not invoke interest in media/tbhp is because they are not new cars. So there could be a long string of reasons for the fire - improper LPG/CNG kit fitment, faulty wiring for accessories, etc etc |
Not surprisingly your posts are based on imaginations. When it comes to Nano your imaginations are always negative and when it comes maruti always positive. I donot think that is co-incidence. First let me analyze two of your posts I pasted above. When I talked about alto's cheap interiors you say atleast alto doesnot catch fire. When I post a link about 800 and wagonR catching fire you say atleast they are not brand new. When other members write about brand new cars catching fire you won't care to respond. This is one good example of how you try to manipulate the post to suit your needs. One good example of how you read what you what to. One good example of what lenth you go to malign a brand. THe police say WagonR one is an accident, ruled out foul play in the second(M800) but you don't want to believe that. The car(wagon R) was not even driven when it caught fire. In both the accidents, drivers cannot open the doors, but you dont see anyting wrong there. Two people died in both the accidents but that's OK for you as the cars are not brand new. Fortunetly not many members share your school of thought. Quote:
Originally Posted by tsk1979 Can you point where does the article say that the cars were brand new being driven out of the showroom? |
RKG pointed about a brand new Merc catching fire. One member posted a link to a swift catching fire while being test driven. What do you say about that?
On an other note, does cars not being brand new give car makers imunity from prosecution? Quote:
Originally Posted by dr.faramroze |
THe best part of the article is:
"Next time Ratan Tata has an idea, don’t tell him it can’t be done"
Last edited by airbender : 6th May 2010 at 05:42.
|