![]() | #211 |
Team-BHP Support ![]() ![]() Join Date: May 2004 Location: Bangalore
Posts: 19,460
Thanked: 12,691 Times
| ![]() Nice so 4 wd is happening now? Which GB/TC is this? Isuzu? |
![]() |
|
![]() | #212 |
BHPian ![]() | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() | #213 | |
Team-BHP Support ![]() ![]() Join Date: May 2004 Location: Bangalore
Posts: 19,460
Thanked: 12,691 Times
| ![]() Quote:
![]() Anyways please do post the details of work in progress so far, with pictures ! | |
![]() |
![]() | #214 | |
BHPian ![]() | ![]() Quote:
We decided to go ahead with the 4*4 conversion processn getting pissed of at 'Jeep being a peep.....' comment. We initially bought the Isuzu trooper gearbox but had to give up as the Nissan's flywheel was big for Isuzu beloxing cover and that came inbuild. Pictures of which are given below. ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | |
![]() |
![]() | #215 |
BHPian ![]() | ![]() And then we got this beauty. A Toyota Hilux 4*4. ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() | #216 |
BHPian ![]() | ![]() We have at last managed to successfully mate the Toyota gearbox on to the Nissan my MM was carrying. The only issue that we faced was with the beloxing cover which wasn't of the same size. We manage to solve it by making one of our own at the workshop. (pictures attached). ![]() We then got it mounted on the chasis 2 days back. The GB is massive and heavier too. Will have to add a leaf or two to the rear to account for this. Performance might be compromised to an extend but ride would be better. So I'm happy with it. Take some, give some. |
![]() |
![]() | #217 |
BHPian ![]() | ![]() We have at last managed to successfully mate the Toyota gearbox on to the Nissan my MM was carrying. The only issue that we faced was with the beloxing cover which wasn't of the same size. We manage to solve it by making one of our own at the workshop. (pictures attached). We have mounted it on the chasis. Will post the snaps later in the day. ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() | #218 |
BHPian ![]() | ![]() After the mounting was done in the chasis. |
![]() |
|
![]() | #219 |
Senior - BHPian ![]() | ![]() Please dont do this mod!! Look at the front shaft sitting above the GB cross member, this is just not right. And even if work it around by pushing the cross member around 12-15 inches towards the back - how short would the rear prop shaft be?? I see this as a outrageous mod, please dont get me wrong. I see so many wrong things here. Eventually your chassis would implode or buckle with all this un-sprung weight in the center - looks MASSSIVE for a jeep chassis. And, its called a Bell-Housing, since it looks like a church bell. Last edited by svsantosh : 27th July 2011 at 15:54. |
![]() |
![]() | #220 | |
BHPian ![]() | ![]() Quote:
Additional leafs should solve this. | |
![]() |
![]() | #221 | ||
Senior - BHPian ![]() | ![]() Quote:
1) Rear shaft will be at a VERY acute angle causing lot of stress on the universal joint, lets say complete drive train. Dont know what tolerances can the GB take. 2) Bigger issue is with the front shaft. Under simple articulation, even bouncy roads the shaft will foul with (i) GB cross member (ii) Looks close bellhousing and engine case. Asking for lot of trouble here!! 3) Look at the angle of the front shaft - even without the weight of the body on chassis/leaf it is GOING UP (GB side is lower than the diff side, if not lower nearly of the same height) - So when the right wheel goes into a ditch/pothole, the shaft is going to comedown along with it and foul with the cross member. When the front right goes up - it will foul with the engine! Quote:
Last edited by svsantosh : 27th July 2011 at 21:52. | ||
![]() |
![]() | #222 | |||
BHPian ![]() | ![]() Quote:
![]() Quote:
Quote:
The weight of the 2.7 Nissan engine is much lesser than MDI engine, and the new Toyota GB that i have added weighs as much as a Isuzu G1 GB. So i dont see any issues there. The leafs in the picture looks stressed because i had removed 2 leafs from my older jeep, putting them back would lessen the stress on the existing leaf. Last edited by prmd_cochin : 28th July 2011 at 11:05. | |||
![]() |
![]() | #223 |
Senior - BHPian ![]() | ![]() Is the rear shaft pic from your jeep? Is the tub mounted on? If not your jeep, then you may need to slightly tweak the position of the leaf mounts to angle the pinion upwards to reduce the joint angle. Oh and not to mention since the rear output of the GB is center (0 offset), you may need to go back to center (0 offset) axle housing. Looks like you have a right offset now. Am i right? Anyways, this is a interesting project, looking fwd to the outcome. Did you take note of where the gear shifter/transfercase shifter is going to popout in your jeep tub? |
![]() |
![]() | #224 | |
BHPian ![]() | ![]() I put it up because you said a shorter rear shaft is an issue. the image is of MM Thar. Quote:
| |
![]() |
![]() | #225 |
Senior - BHPian ![]() | ![]() We cant assume the position of the short shaft on the thar will be the same on ur jeep too. Many things will differ, have you fabricated one for your jeep spec? Also, am I right on the offset of ur axle part? |
![]() | ![]() |