The DSLR Thread

amitoj · 27th November 2008, 10:37

Right. The more people i talk to, more they are recommending 1000D over 450D.
And now some people are recommending that its better to go for a 400D instead of a 1000D! Come to think of it, if i go for 400D, then i can get a decent tripod also with the money i save!

And as far as Nikons go, its only D60 which seems affordable to me. unless i go for the D90 with 18-105mm VR lens, but then i would have to plonk 70K in one shot. That would be too much.

mclaren1885 · 27th November 2008, 10:45

Paaji, just pick up the 1000D. If the cam was high on Rudy's recommendation list I am sure it must be good. I would trust the old man blindly on anything related to Canon. He earns a living out of their products. Speak to Rudy and see what he suggests.

jkdas · 27th November 2008, 10:52

Quote:

Originally Posted by amitoj

Right. The more people i talk to, more they are recommending 1000D over 450D.
And now some people are recommending that its better to go for a 400D instead of a 1000D! Come to think of it, if i go for 400D, then i can get a decent tripod also with the money i save!

And as far as Nikons go, its only D60 which seems affordable to me. unless i go for the D90 with 18-105mm VR lens, but then i would have to plonk 70K in one shot. That would be too much.

If you are lucky you can grab a D80 for a good price as D90 is out. right?

Only if the $ value was better. Jut fyi, I was quoted D60 kit for 27K and was told that it used to sell at 25k before.

suman · 27th November 2008, 10:58

Quote:

Originally Posted by mclaren1885

If the cam was high on Rudy's recommendation list I am sure it must be good. I would trust the old man blindly on anything related to Canon.

And why do you think I eventually bought the 450D

?

tsk1979 · 27th November 2008, 12:48

Amitoj, from a picture quality point of view 1000D and 450D will give you the same thing. Infact 400D is same as 1000D as 1000D is just a "reduced function" version of 400D.
However, 400D/1000D are not very great focus heroes. 450D AF mechanism is faster and slightly more accurate, esp if you use center focus point with a fast lens.

However the ultimate bargain in the market now is the 40D, and it costs just as much as the 450D. So if you have a 450D budget, get the 40D, its a gem of a cam. Amazing AF, and great picture quality. Its actually a better buy than the 50D at current price

amitoj · 27th November 2008, 16:34

Quote:

Originally Posted by tsk1979

However the ultimate bargain in the market now is the 40D, and it costs just as much as the 450D. So if you have a 450D budget, get the 40D, its a gem of a cam. Amazing AF, and great picture quality. Its actually a better buy than the 50D at current price

sigh. the more i delay the more i get confused.

40D is 15K more than 450D!!

tsk1979 · 27th November 2008, 16:48

Actually abroad its just a 100$ diff, and this reflects in grey.
Anyways, if you are not an avid birder the 400D and 1000D are good enough.

extreme_torque · 27th November 2008, 16:55

Guys, Nikon D300 or the Canon 40 or 50D considering this would be my first DSLR?

Spitfire · 27th November 2008, 17:02

Ok i am in this too. I dont know how to load a roll in a camera and the Digital camera's have been a God's gift for me. I have a point and shoot Sony DSC W5 (small thing that does the job for me quite well).

But my wife is an avid photographer, started very young and managed to be quite good at it. Even did some professional photography before an unexpected personal calamity took away everything, even the camera. Which if i remember from the pics she showed me looked like a bazooka. Costing about 3 lakhs in the late 90's (Mind Boggling and Unbelievable for me).

I want to gift her a DSLR for her Birthday in January and i am following this thread quite closely. Let the discussions continue.

finneyp · 27th November 2008, 17:06

Welcome E_T to the dSLR hunt!

If you have the moolah, go for Nikon D300 or Canon 50D.
If on a budget, go for Nikon D90 or Canon 40D.

I have finalized on Nikon D90, but in a dilemma over the lens, stuck between:
Nikkor AF-S 18-105 VR or 18-200 VR!

Samurai · 27th November 2008, 17:12

Quote:

Originally Posted by Spitfire

Which if i remember from the pics she showed me looked like a bazooka. Costing about 3 lakhs in the late 90's (Mind Boggling and Unbelievable for me).

If she is such an expert, don't make the mistake of choosing the gift yourself. Experts will be very picky about equipment, you don't want to present something that doesn't match her needs. But if you insist on it, first find out what kind of photography she used to do.

Akshay1234 · 27th November 2008, 17:23

Quote:

Originally Posted by finneyp

18-200 VR!

picked up the 18-200VR for my d300. yet to try it out.

finneyp · 27th November 2008, 17:31

Quote:

Originally Posted by akshay1234

picked up the 18-200VR for my d300. yet to try it out.

Congrats Akshay!

Please try it out & post a review asap!
I can then decide my lens too

Spitfire · 27th November 2008, 17:50

Quote:

Originally Posted by Samurai

If she is such an expert, don't make the mistake of choosing the gift yourself. Experts will be very picky about equipment, you don't want to present something that doesn't match her needs. But if you insist on it, first find out what kind of photography she used to do.

Thanks for the suggestion Samurai, appreciate it.

She used to shoot professinally for lot of print ads and some projects with WWF and BBC. After what she had to go through, gave up photography completely and has after a lot of years got into it after we had a baby.

I am not sure whether its the right gift. It might bring back memories of incidents she might have left behind. But she keeps complaining about shooting better and i thought instead of going the whole hog, get a decent enough camera suiting our very basic needs but gives her some happiness to shoot they way she could have liked.

amitoj · 27th November 2008, 18:18

Nice thoughts there, Spitfire. Looked like a bazooka? must be a telephoto lens?

So, a 1000D with 18-55mm IS and a tripod. Seems like a winning combination for me right now.

27th November 2008, 10:37	#91
amitoj Senior - BHPian Join Date: Nov 2004 Location: Windham, NH USA Posts: 3,348 Thanked: 3,105 Times View My Garage	Right. The more people i talk to, more they are recommending 1000D over 450D. And now some people are recommending that its better to go for a 400D instead of a 1000D! Come to think of it, if i go for 400D, then i can get a decent tripod also with the money i save! And as far as Nikons go, its only D60 which seems affordable to me. unless i go for the D90 with 18-105mm VR lens, but then i would have to plonk 70K in one shot. That would be too much.
	() Thanks

27th November 2008, 10:45	#92
mclaren1885 BANNED Join Date: Jul 2005 Location: Bangalore (the city of modded cars) !! Posts: 4,820 Thanked: 45 Times View My Garage Infractions: 0/1 (10)	Paaji, just pick up the 1000D. If the cam was high on Rudy's recommendation list I am sure it must be good. I would trust the old man blindly on anything related to Canon. He earns a living out of their products. Speak to Rudy and see what he suggests.
	() Thanks

27th November 2008, 12:48	#95
tsk1979 Team-BHP Support Join Date: Feb 2005 Location: San Jose, CA Posts: 23,717 Thanked: 22,825 Times View My Garage	Amitoj, from a picture quality point of view 1000D and 450D will give you the same thing. Infact 400D is same as 1000D as 1000D is just a "reduced function" version of 400D. However, 400D/1000D are not very great focus heroes. 450D AF mechanism is faster and slightly more accurate, esp if you use center focus point with a fast lens. However the ultimate bargain in the market now is the 40D, and it costs just as much as the 450D. So if you have a 450D budget, get the 40D, its a gem of a cam. Amazing AF, and great picture quality. Its actually a better buy than the 50D at current price
	() Thanks

27th November 2008, 16:48	#97
tsk1979 Team-BHP Support Join Date: Feb 2005 Location: San Jose, CA Posts: 23,717 Thanked: 22,825 Times View My Garage	Actually abroad its just a 100$ diff, and this reflects in grey. Anyways, if you are not an avid birder the 400D and 1000D are good enough.
	() Thanks

27th November 2008, 16:55	#98
extreme_torque Senior - BHPian Join Date: Feb 2005 Location: Melbourne Posts: 4,377 Thanked: 5,105 Times	Guys, Nikon D300 or the Canon 40 or 50D considering this would be my first DSLR?
	() Thanks

27th November 2008, 17:02	#99
Spitfire BANNED Join Date: Jul 2006 Location: Panaji - Goa/Bangalore - Karnataka Posts: 3,312 Thanked: 774 Times	Ok i am in this too. I dont know how to load a roll in a camera and the Digital camera's have been a God's gift for me. I have a point and shoot Sony DSC W5 (small thing that does the job for me quite well). But my wife is an avid photographer, started very young and managed to be quite good at it. Even did some professional photography before an unexpected personal calamity took away everything, even the camera. Which if i remember from the pics she showed me looked like a bazooka. Costing about 3 lakhs in the late 90's (Mind Boggling and Unbelievable for me). I want to gift her a DSLR for her Birthday in January and i am following this thread quite closely. Let the discussions continue.
	() Thanks

27th November 2008, 17:06	#100
finneyp Senior - BHPian Join Date: Dec 2005 Location: Bangalore Posts: 2,716 Thanked: 319 Times View My Garage	Welcome E_T to the dSLR hunt! If you have the moolah, go for Nikon D300 or Canon 50D. If on a budget, go for Nikon D90 or Canon 40D. I have finalized on Nikon D90, but in a dilemma over the lens, stuck between: Nikkor AF-S 18-105 VR or 18-200 VR! Last edited by finneyp : 27th November 2008 at 17:07.
	() Thanks

27th November 2008, 18:18	#105
amitoj Senior - BHPian Join Date: Nov 2004 Location: Windham, NH USA Posts: 3,348 Thanked: 3,105 Times View My Garage	Nice thoughts there, Spitfire. Looked like a bazooka? must be a telephoto lens? So, a 1000D with 18-55mm IS and a tripod. Seems like a winning combination for me right now.
	() Thanks