Quote:
Originally Posted by rippergeo i can be driving at 40kmph through the city in a little hatch, and still have fun, and not worry about being photographed by the govt for speeding.
for eg- the thread starter himself got ticketed for doing a piddling 34mph in a 30mph zone at 0200hrs.How silly is that? |
I am glad that I do not have to worry about such scenarios here in good old India (at least not yet). Yesterday, on the bridge approaching Lonawala from Pune on the Expressway, I saw the speed limit sign at 30 kmph; looked down at my speedo and it was reading 120 kmph! I was still slowing down, but did not go below ~90 kmph on the entire bridge. The sheer absurdity of this speed limit never fails to amaze me even now, when I have done this route dozens and dozens of times. If somebody sees this speed limit and were to brake to slow down, he would be much more of a hazard than I would be at 120 kmph.
Quote:
See, I love driving like that, but some people think that is rash, and its not going to be long before someone on the forum flames you for driving like that, and me for admitting that i like driving like that.
as long as I'm not running anyone off the road, or making them swerve or panic brake,i think I'm being safe! people might disagree, but I think its logical.
Of course it would be safer to stick to my own lane, and I'd rather drive in my own lane if i had the choice. but that option does not exist in india. you have to weave and lane change like mad to get somewhere on time. The thing is,I enjoy doing that.
|
So do I. And with painfullly slow traffic on all lanes, I agree that there is no other practical way to drive, if you want to get from point A to point B in reasonable time. But here it is important to recognize that such a driving style has its own dangers and the driver must be skilled and alert at all times, never letting down his guard.
Quote:
I don't agree, the faster a car can accelerate, the safer it is. it means you can complete your overtaking maneuver before danger gets to you from the opp lane.
If you say that the car accelerated too fast for you to control it, you have no one else to blame but you and your right foot.
|
It is true that for a given overtaking scenario, the car with better acceleration would be safer. But the problem is that heavy acceleration would seemingly bring within range scenarios that are out of range for the less powerful vehicles, which wouldn't even consider such scenarios. Once a driver commits himself and accelerates, he should be 100% certain that nothing will go wrong. But so many little things can go wrong on our roads and the margins for error will be considerably less in such overtakes, because you will get committed to the overtake very early.
I personally prefer to maintain speed and overtake with minimal acceleration whenever possible, as this allows me to abort or change course at the last possible moment. The key is that a small maneuverable car like Santro allows me to maintain speed on even traffic-filled and relatively narrow roads. On the bigger and heavier cars, you have no option but to rely on acceleration as you will get slowed down more frequently due to lack of road space.
This point was driven home to me as I was following a Ford Mondeo on the Pune bypass road (a relatively narrow, traffic-filled 4-lane highway). He got stuck behind a lorry, I saw the gap to the left and ripped past the guy and the lorry ahead. Looked in my mirror, and sure enough, the guy was provoked. What happened afterwards would have scared the living daylights out of a less experienced driver. The Mondeo guy just could not accept that he had to let me go under those conditions and kept accelerating crazily to zoom past me, only to get stuck ahead. I would then again overtake him. It occurred to me that his overtaking maneuvers were far, far more unsafe than mine. I relied on maintaining speed and maneuvering, while he relied on brute acceleration.