Quote:
Originally Posted by amit_purohit20 Guys, in this thread where most people are discussing tyres of performance bikes. I ask a humble question- What rear tyre for my 10 year old TVS Victor?
Spec sizes are- 3" x 18", Tube type TT |
Ok guys so this time I didnot wait for the inputs from your side. I trusted the saying - Without dying yourself you can not get heaven.
Today I reeced the market and found:
CEAT Tyres:
Ceat Gripp

Ceat Vertigo Sport

Ceat Secura
All the above tyres with tube were near about 1700 Rs or less.
Difference between GRIPP and Vertigo sport is that Gripp has Studds with greater height and more spacing between the studs.
MRF tyres:
MRF MOTO D, METEOR M,
MRF has launched a plethora of tyres under the dual purpose category and its so confusing to choose one.
MRF Meteor M costs 1850
and MRF MOTO D and METEOR costs 1750.
MICHELIN tyres:
Michelin Sirac Street
Michelin has only one model for 3 x 18 size thats the Michelin Sirac Street Tubetype.
Cost- Rs 1800 but in Pune I think it doesnot sell much so one of the dealer was ready to reduce it to 1700 rs.
Criteria used for selection:
I shortlisted the above tyre companies based on reading a lot of feedbacks, but as I had not much clear, sometimes contradicting feedback for above tyres I used my own way of coming up with the selection. I dont know whether the below mentioned ways do any justice to the real world grip levels. But the below points were used based on my experience on hard compound tyres like TVS, Contigo and to some extent Dunlop.
1) Pinching the tyre with my nails and checking for the depth of the depression and the time taken to recover.Soft or medium compound tyres have bigger depressions and takes more time to recover and the depression lasts longer.
2) Rubbing the tyre with my thumb and feeling the minute layers of rubber come out.For hard compound tyres I hardly find enough layers of rubber coming out. But this test is little bit vague as some times some known hard compound tyres also loose some layers of rubber. I think it all depends upon what the tyres are coated with at the final stage. Overall Hard compound tyres have smooth and hard surface and your thumbs slide easily over the surface.
The winner in the first test was CEAT GRIPP even better than Michelin Sirac Street. MRF was a little second as compared to the other two.
For the second test Michelin was the winner, second was MRF and third CEAT GRIPP.
I have chosen
CEAT GRIPP.
Why did I choose CEAT GRIPP:
1) After the wonderful recent add of CEAT focussing on the superior Wet grip, I admit I was little bit biased.
2) Ceat gripp had the biggest height of studs and they were bending with my fingers thus giving me the feeling that the rubber was not too hard.
3) I have still not upgraded my RTR180's stock tyres and was planning for Ceat Vertigo Sport so using CEAT tyres in my Victor will give me a real first hand experience to confirm my decision.
ON-ROAD Experience of CEAT GRIPP:
As soon as my Victor was fitted with the new tyre I directly took the bike in and around Saswad Ghats (In Pune) and through some off-road slush although it was getting dark.
Following are my observations:
1) Grip on wet tarmac has increased by leaps and bounds as compared to the previous TVS Crappy tyre. I am satisfied with the grip levels and felt confident driving on-road on average speeds.
2) Dry road grip is also good and has improved over the other tyre, but need to do a more exhaustive test to come out with specific points.
3) Braking on dry road has improved substantially, the earlier tyre used to skid easily with the lightest tap on brakes.
4) Braking and grip in gravel has improved drastically, I felt quite confident on gravel.
5) Grip during off-roading is also good as the long studs edge themselves on the stones and sharp ground contours.
6) Grip in Slush,Slurry- One word excellent falls short.
7) Cornering Grip is good but very hard cornering- I wont recommend because I think the long studs bend during hard cornering giving a feeling of slight movement of the rear tyre. But I want to be specifically clear that for an average joe like me I would rarely feel this as a limitation.
8) High speed on dry tarmac - I cant comment because the Victor is too old to get to high speeds and I am an average joe so wont dare to take a bike 10 years old without disc brakes to its top speed on roads filled with villagers.
Other points:
1) I didnt choose TVS and Dunlop because read some negative reviews about the same and actually felt their hardness when tested.
2) All the above market reece was done in Hadapsar Pune, which is not known to be a good tyre market so could not get any other brands like IRC or Vee rubber.
3) One of my favourite Zapper C was not available.CEAT Vertio Sport was not available in 3x18 size.
4) I observed that now the trend in market is to bring tyres like motocross stud type gears and most people feel that a stud type tyre gives more grip on road! Inspite of the reduced contact patch people feel the stud type gives more grip on roads although for off-road grip they are correct.
5) Market changer was CEAT's adds and they were to first to bring tyres having studds (eg. CEAT Vertigo Sport).
6) Rest other manufacturers have followed like TVS,DUNLOP,MRF- recently launched MOGRIP and Meteor series.(Correct me if I am wrong.)
7) In one of the tyre shops Dunlop's van had come. Dunlop has now recently come with a nearly identical Motocross type tyre. This is a growing fad (Studd type tyres). They have gone to the extent where alternate studs have micro studs on themselves. The spacing between two studs is huge nearly like a tractor wheel lugs spacing.
8) The Dunlop Van carried away a lot of defective under warranty Dunlop tyres. The number of defective tyres sentback from a single shop were quite high. This does not create a good impression at least to me. But I have not seen the defectives for MRF and CEAT so can be wrong.
*For the pics- Thanks google and all other internet websites from whom the pics have been taken.