Quote:
Originally Posted by Beast_of_Burden The zma has a windshield that actually works better than advertised, one of the best in the business. In my mind the fairing is its defining feature, I love it now but that wasn't always the case. I initially thought it half hearted and a lame attempt at sport bike styling. Its one of those things that grows on you.
Duke is stiff and won't be comfortable on anything less than smooth roads, especially with two people up. Besides it's best enjoyed throwing it into corners, not to be ridden serenely at a comfortable pace.
The zma's low end torque means it doesn't seem to be working any harder with two people up. I am in love with the levels of refinement.
I own both, the contrast couldn't be greater. How I wish the Duke had the Zma's levels of refinement, then it would have been perfect. On the other hand, the Duke's gruffness is perhaps its defining characteristic. |
I do agree with the fairing being good when it comes to wind protection, but one thing that i have always been concerned of is the fairing making lots of sound when vibrating, and it is the first part that will break off when the bike falls, and i am sure no one wants a hanging fairing when in remote mountains. i am sure you will understand my love for no fairing with the photo bellow of my Pulsar
220 Quote:
Originally Posted by a4anurag Congratulations on owning the best bikes in history. Beautifully written and short one but to the matter. Loved it.
I too own a Black Karizma R (2009 model) that has clocked 23K kms (Sleeps at home most of the time)
I am a big fan of the Karizma for its engine and looks (fairing, engine belly cover also adds a sporty look to the whole bike). I feel the engine as a diesel one as the low-end torque is unbeatable and just needs a twist of throttle, flies without hesitation.
Ownership costs, yes is a bit on the higher side but all the high-end bikes demand high costs so it is acceptable. I haven't spent much on it ither than oil + oil filter change every 2K kms religiously. This bike is one thing to own by an enthusiast.
Comparing the Karizma with the bullet is difficult as both are class apart with didn't setup. I'm not getting reliability factor in here. A charm that a bullet has is not achievable by any other bike.
The Duke in any format is only for rider and for short distances, the riding position I felt is to upright with suspension and ride quality being in the harder side. If you're looking at track days I will take the Duke first then the Karizma.
Anurag. |
Thanks Man, i have been lucky,i have always loved bit of retro and naked. This karizma is at 20000 km range.
and yes it s not really easy to compare bullet and Karizma, its just that with Karizma things are easy, and thats what you want when you are married.
Quote:
Originally Posted by phamilyman bhaijee, congrats. This is nice.
I REALLY like the fact that you guys are still touring on the bike after marriage - we shifted wholesale to the car (wife finds it more comfortable plus she can sleep endlessly while I drive for hours on end esp on trips with limited time).
Curious - how cheap was the karizma? I would've considered a new CBR if I was in your place. |
Thanks Sir jee... yes i love this fact that we still use our bike most of the time. though i havent done bad with the car either, i did 50000 kms in the first two years of the owner ship of the ford. and still going strong. My Mrs. does not like to sleep while she is driving and that is bit a pain some times. (When she says Kuch acha bolo na. lol )
The karizma cost me early 30' gandhies so when i am done with the repairs it will be around 40, and then i have a brand new carb lying around and rear disk setup, all of this is going to go on this bike.
The CBR's were way more than what i wanted to spend. and if i had to Buy a CBR or if i had to spend that much of money i would have gone with the Pulsar 200 NS, cause if you would agree with me Brand new is Brand new.
Also because of all the stories that i have heard with the Liquid cooling problems in remote i kinda backed out. cause i dont want to carry my spanners and other jugads with me any more.
Quote:
Originally Posted by vishwaschettri Nice!
Zma is one of the best tourers which is easy on the pocket also.
Its relaxed engine can do 100+ all day without any fatigue to ride or rider. Add to this a comfortable pillion perch, zero vibrations, honda reliability, hero's service network and you have an excellent tourer.
The fairing was the Achilles heel and would vibrate like hell in an otherwise refined bike. Good yous is already dispensed with.
I would suggest not to spend much on cosmetics. Debadge it and make it a motard/enduro with a rally handle and high front mudguard.
These mods will come handy in leh trips as well since stock handle gets bent easily in slightest of falls and stock mudguard doesnt have clearence to let mud smeared tires move freely when going through serious slush.
Something to inspire from a XBHP thread. Attachment 1187799 Attachment 1187800
Bike is anyway jetted lean from factory so you are good for high altitudes.
cheers
Vishwas
p.s. - The bike looks pretty beat up cosmetically. Hope you got a very good deal on it. |
I quite like the bike in this image. i may want to do something simmilar, but would just keep way from the offroad look cause i ride my bike to office frequently and would not want to be called Ajay Devgan (

)
i am not going to spend too much just the Right pannel for the bike is to be changed and then i have every thing else from another karizma. Tank will be painted plain red.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ford5 I had a query about the karizma's engine. The Carb version which Hero and EBL have reworked and gives out slightly more power. Has anyone ridden it? Does it provide better refinement and torque? |
Not me my friend, i am bit not too much adventurous when it comes to sheer ugliness.
And here is my Pulsar 220, many people said it is just a 180 with the badgeing but again i am not going to please any stupid thing. I dont like Fairings
