My Beetle is here

PAVAN KADAM · 25th April 2008, 11:43

My reply in BOLD

Pawan's responses are all over the place and not really addressing any of the issues in particular

Pls address the so called issues Mr Vijay.

From what I see in the posts, looks like automannj did get a raw deal. Which definitely goes against the spirit of the forum.

Do you really know how the entire deal went through?

Lets not reply for the sake of it without knowing the History

My tuppence - purely based on what I have read on this thread.

MR Kalyan Kindly clarify

automannj · 25th April 2008, 12:35

Quote:

Originally Posted by PAVAN KADAM

MR Kalyan Kindly clarify

I am trying to sort this out with Ryan.

prabhuav · 25th April 2008, 16:05

Ooh , some one is taking things personally.

I have been very clear that my thoughts are based on what I have read on the thread so far.

Dont send me PMs asking me to keep my nose out of your business. You are the one who made it public in the first place.

S@~+#0$# · 25th April 2008, 16:36

Take a chill pill guys. I don't see why you guys are

.

Let the people involved(read as Ryan and Automannj) in the transaction sort it out. Pavan was merely an enthusiast involved in the restoration of this bug. We'll wait until automannj sorts this out with Ryan and posts the update here.

automannj · 4th May 2008, 22:09

Quote:

Originally Posted by automannj

I am trying to sort this out with Ryan.

Here is the story on my beetle, originally it had a 1300 engine which was removed because it was not performing well. Then it was fitted with a 1500 engine (Ryan confirmed that is what I have now).
To match the book and to smoothen the transfer procedure, 1500 engine# is scraped off the stand and original 1300 engine # has been printed in its place.

Technocrat · 5th May 2008, 12:12

So it is a 1500 cc engine with engine number of the 1300 cc one?

nitrous · 5th May 2008, 12:46

Punching the old engine to the replacement engine on a car is very normal. And infact, I feel you're lucky to get a good 1500 engine.
Enjoy the extra power from the 200 cc.

S@~+#0$# · 5th May 2008, 13:18

Quote:

Originally Posted by nitrous

Punching the old engine to the replacement engine on a car is very normal. And infact, I feel you're lucky to get a good 1500 engine.
Enjoy the extra power from the 200 cc.

Exactly my thoughts too!!!

Naren4140 · 5th May 2008, 15:11

i completely disagree and it is illegal, there is an option of changing the Engine Number from RTO and get it endorsed on the RC book.

Jaggu · 5th May 2008, 16:28

Quote:

Originally Posted by Naren4140

i completely disagree and it is illegal, there is an option of changing the Engine Number from RTO and get it endorsed on the RC book.

Though the ideal thing to do, is a pain in reality. Especially if one is approaching with an old car, as in this case.

Naren4140 · 5th May 2008, 17:16

Jaggu ur analogy is like "if an exam is difficult to pass by studying for it" then using cheat sheet or copying is acceptable...!!!
come on guys !!!

Stanher · 5th May 2008, 18:28

Quote:

Originally Posted by Naren4140

i completely disagree and it is illegal, there is an option of changing the Engine Number from RTO and get it endorsed on the RC book.

Only I guess its too late for that considering the car has come over here.

Naren4140 · 5th May 2008, 19:26

it's sad that automannjj got a raw deal and things were not made clear to him before he picked up the car. I hope ammends are made !!!

PAVAN KADAM · 6th May 2008, 17:38

Guys.

When the seller and the Buyer is happy and are not bothering to clear the air on the forum, Why should there be an arguments and counter arguments over this issue.

I am again reitrating.

LETS NOT ARGUE OVER A THREAD WITHOUT KNOWING WHAT KIND OF DEAL THE BUYER OR SELLER WAS INTO.

Jaggu,

I agree that almost 80% of classics or vintages in the world have got a punched engine number, and yes they are common.

automannj · 6th May 2008, 22:02

Quote:

Originally Posted by Technocrat

So it is a 1500 cc engine with engine number of the 1300 cc one?

Yep. That is correct.

25th April 2008, 11:43	#31
PAVAN KADAM BANNED Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: NAMMA BENGALURU Posts: 5,601 Thanked: 2,557 Times	My reply in BOLD Pawan's responses are all over the place and not really addressing any of the issues in particular Pls address the so called issues Mr Vijay. From what I see in the posts, looks like automannj did get a raw deal. Which definitely goes against the spirit of the forum. Do you really know how the entire deal went through? Lets not reply for the sake of it without knowing the History My tuppence - purely based on what I have read on this thread. MR Kalyan Kindly clarify
	() Thanks

25th April 2008, 16:05	#33
prabhuav BHPian Join Date: Jun 2007 Location: Bangalore Posts: 672 Thanked: 129 Times View My Garage	Ooh , some one is taking things personally. I have been very clear that my thoughts are based on what I have read on the thread so far. Dont send me PMs asking me to keep my nose out of your business. You are the one who made it public in the first place.
	() Thanks

25th April 2008, 16:36	#34
S@~+#0$# BHPian Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: Bangalore Posts: 700 Thanked: 43 Times View My Garage	Take a chill pill guys. I don't see why you guys are . Let the people involved(read as Ryan and Automannj) in the transaction sort it out. Pavan was merely an enthusiast involved in the restoration of this bug. We'll wait until automannj sorts this out with Ryan and posts the update here.
	() Thanks

5th May 2008, 12:12	#36
Technocrat Senior - BHPian Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: GTA Posts: 14,770 Thanked: 2,705 Times	So it is a 1500 cc engine with engine number of the 1300 cc one?
	() Thanks

5th May 2008, 12:46	#37
nitrous Senior - BHPian Join Date: May 2004 Location: UAE/Lon/Madras Posts: 6,965 Thanked: 333 Times View My Garage	Punching the old engine to the replacement engine on a car is very normal. And infact, I feel you're lucky to get a good 1500 engine. Enjoy the extra power from the 200 cc.
	() Thanks

5th May 2008, 15:11	#39
Naren4140 BHPian Join Date: Aug 2007 Location: Bendakaalooru Posts: 126 Thanked: 3 Times	i completely disagree and it is illegal, there is an option of changing the Engine Number from RTO and get it endorsed on the RC book.
	() Thanks

5th May 2008, 17:16	#41
Naren4140 BHPian Join Date: Aug 2007 Location: Bendakaalooru Posts: 126 Thanked: 3 Times	Jaggu ur analogy is like "if an exam is difficult to pass by studying for it" then using cheat sheet or copying is acceptable...!!! come on guys !!!
	() Thanks

5th May 2008, 19:26	#43
Naren4140 BHPian Join Date: Aug 2007 Location: Bendakaalooru Posts: 126 Thanked: 3 Times	it's sad that automannjj got a raw deal and things were not made clear to him before he picked up the car. I hope ammends are made !!!
	() Thanks

6th May 2008, 17:38	#44
PAVAN KADAM BANNED Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: NAMMA BENGALURU Posts: 5,601 Thanked: 2,557 Times	Guys. When the seller and the Buyer is happy and are not bothering to clear the air on the forum, Why should there be an arguments and counter arguments over this issue. I am again reitrating. LETS NOT ARGUE OVER A THREAD WITHOUT KNOWING WHAT KIND OF DEAL THE BUYER OR SELLER WAS INTO. Jaggu, I agree that almost 80% of classics or vintages in the world have got a punched engine number, and yes they are common.
	() Thanks