Quote:
Originally Posted by DigitalOne |
My
New Indian Express has it as Stage-3 testing in India. In fact, the same paper carries two stories, one in which such testing is proposed and one in which it is agreed!
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zen2001 And how convenient to label any death as a covid death just based on a swab report! Just forget all other co morbidities or even any new condition that may have actually caused it! The true covid deaths might not even be half of what they are being reported. |
And how convenient to label any death as a non-covid death just based on a co-morbidity! The true covid deaths might be considerably more than being reported.
There is merit in both these views. But the world's politicians prefer the former, because it makes them look better, which is, of course, more important than the truth.
Quote:
Sarcastically, (& miraculously) on the upside, we suddenly have no deaths due to TB, malaria, dengue, malnutrition, diarrhea or heck, even cardiovascular diseases or cancer now! What a masterstroke! |
Oh, but we do! All the ones that you are mentioning are listed as "didn't die from covid-19."
Frankly, though, I don't think that the media is interested, covid or not, in reporting deaths from the usual, regular causes.
Quote:
Originally Posted by DigitalOne I had written about this earlier - the debate between "dying of Covid" (no co-morbidities) and "Dying with Covid" (with co-morbidities) is a fascinating one. According to US CDC, only 6% of deaths in US can be attributed to Covid only (i.e. no co-morbidities). This was taken by many that the threat of Covid is grossly exaggerated. Of course, the scenario is much more nuanced than a simple 6% number. |
The insistence is on drawing a line, black/white, covid/non-covid. If you recovered from covid yesterday, test negative, and die of a heart attack or stroke today,
you didn't die of covid.
Quote:
Originally Posted by am1m Someone should tell Goa Post before they distribute their new covers promoting plasma therapy! |
Sad to see this news about plasma being taken off the potentially-useful list. I wonder if other countries are doing the same?
Quote:
The amount of misinformation on this virus is staggering. I think it's perfectly normal for the information on a new disease and it's treatments to evolve and change and even reverse as scientists and doctors learn more. That is a part of the scientific process and there is no shortcut.
|
People just can't get it into their heads that
this is new. The word
novel is the clue. Actually, perhaps we have got too used to medical science coping with things. It's hard to accept that, in the face of
this thing they are still blundering around.
Quote:
But what has soured this entire experience is the rush by the media to snatch any bit of evolving information, positive or negative and publish headlines of that as the absolute truth ('plasma therapy', 'reinfection', 'immunity boosters', 'airborne', 'particulate', 'surface contamination', etc. etc.)
|
There's always an issue with non-scientists reporting science. Journalists pick the buzzwords. That's life. An article I read on
Ars Technica a year or three ago described just how boring and difficulties the life of a serious science correspondent is: trawling through paper after paper to find the seriously interesting and then translating that for non-specialist readers.
Quote:
How a medical issue can become so political the world over has also been amazing (and sad) to see. It's no longer simply about how a virus behaves and affects the human body, which is science and just is, but it's been a lot about which 'side' you are on, what you 'believe'. Crazy. I think the majority of us are just wired to accept things on 'belief' rather than facts or reason. Very sad after all these years of scientific knowledge and method. (And also explains why politicians the world over can play us so easily and keep getting away with it.)
|
Too right. "The vaccine" is playing a part in the electoral campaign of a world leader who dismissed it as a hoax. Sadly, world leaders are running the show, controlling the resources and the restrictions. Some are doing better than others. Some are doing so appallingly badly that farce and tragedy are entirely merged.
Politicians are not qualified to do this stuff. Nobody includes it in their campaign: nobody is elected on the basis of what they would do in a pandemic. Politicians make socio-economic tweaks according to their dogma, and, goodness knows, they can do enough harm just doing that. But they've got the job; we are where we are and it is where it is, and this story has a long time to run yet. And when you mix that in with the beliefs, superstitions, misinformation, not to mention hopes and fears, of us ordinary people.