Quote:
Originally Posted by Shan2nu Yes it should, but how do you conclude as to which fig was your actual top speed? How can you be sure that the ave speed is a result of 120-150 and not 110-140 (just incase your average turns out to be 130kmph)?
It's just too complicated a method. If you want to know your average speed use "distance travelled / time taken". |
Actually that is what I am doing here for the straight section of the Expressway. I am estimating the total distance travelled as 80 kms, I am estimaitng the total time taken for traversing this distance as 36 mins. So the true avg. speed works out as 133.33 kmph.
Next I observe that the lowest speed that I run at in the straight sections is maybe 120 kmph (speedo). And the top speed that I reach is 150 kmph (speedo). There is a theorem of elementary mathematics (called mean-value theorem) which asserts that the average speed in a time interval should be in between the minimum and maximum speeds attained. So if my speedo readings are indeed close to the true values, my true avg. speed should be somewhere in between 120-150 kmph. This does check. Of course this doesn't prove that the true top speed was 150 kmph -- as you point out, it could have been 140 as well. But if I had found my true avg. speed as 110 kmph in the previous paragraph, I can guess that my speedo is definitely having huge errors. So this is at best a crude estimate, nothing more.
You can guess that on the straights the speed will not deviate much from the average, so if the true avg. was 130 kmph, likely that the true top speed was within about 15-20 kmph, i.e., maybe 145-150 kmph. But this is only an educated guess given the nature of the Expressway. On the other hand, to maintain an average of 100 kmph on Pune bypass road (NH4) you probably would need to do a top speed of 180+ kmph -- because unlike the Expressway there are many sections of this road where you would be slowed down by traffic to 60 kmph or less for significant periods of time. |