This thread is turning into an unstoppable avalanche of posts! At this rate, Poloers will incur the wrath of other humans!
More feedback, info and answers to specific queries:
1. There doesn't seem to be a problem with banging the left knee against the center console. It's advisable to sit upright rather than lean back/slouch/have wayward mobility. Sure being over 6 feet tall means that the left leg brushes the console from time to time but then we're driving a car, not a sofa.
2. The highest speed I've driven the Polo at is about 85kph. The max I've driven the Punto at is about 135. The Polo does communicate the interaction between the tire and the road to the driver while the Punto just munches up the miles (or rather kilometers) with relative ease.
At lower speeds in the city, driving the Punto feels a tiny bit like herding an elephant, the car is a bit slow to move around. The Polo is pointy, much like a puppy waiting to explore the world.
3. The Polo does have a plastic sump guard.
4. Spares and service might be an issue with VW, especially for those venturing into the more remote areas of the country. Fiat/Tata's extensive network is definitely at an advantage here. City dwellers shouldn't have a problem though - there are at least 4 VW service centers dotted across Delhi NCR. I expect VW to open more dealerships in B and C level cities soon enough.
5. Visibility along the rear edges isn't too good in the Polo but is slightly worse in the Punto. Most drivers will learn to adapt themselves to make the best of limited rear visibility though.
6. The rear folding seats in both cars are a bonus. With the seats down, boot space is cavernous and can easily accomodate a couple of full size suitcases.
7. It might be a placebo effect but the throw of the low beam headlights in the Polo seem to be a wee bit better than the Polo. The high beams seem equal enough. I'm going to try and run a headlamp test with the original factory bulbs tonight and will post some pics. My Punto's eyes are a set of Philips XtremePowers.
8. A trip to BK Tires in Lajpat Nagar should help me choose the right set of tires. Not that there's anything wrong with the JKs, it's just that I wouldn't feel confident driving a car on tier-II branded tires during the monsoon.
9. Since it's pretty hot in Delhi right now, a test of the HVAC systems is crucial. I can safely say that the Polo has a good HVAC system that does it's job - was 41 in Delhi today (according to the Punto's on-board temperature guage) and I felt comfortable. The full ACC in the Punto does display its strength here - I don't need to mess around to find the ideal settings for the temperature and blower. It's a case of get in and get going. However, both cars are outgunned by the Figo that has one heck of a blower.
10. The Polo's brake pedal is certainly a tiny bit higher than the accelerator pedal but that's just nitpicking. Maybe VW engineers did that on purpose to reduce braking time in the event of an emergency?
11. There was a problem with the rear wiper in the Polo and it shall be replaced in a couple of days.
12. Fuel economy in the Polo is roughly 14kpl with a majority of city driving. The Punto ranges from 11-12kpl in the city to a high of 15kpl on the highway.
13. One more thing that I just noticed today - I knew the Punto had a single reverse light but it seems the the Germans have followed the Italians with this seemingly daft practice. The Polo has a single reverse light in the left rear cluster.
14. Someone asked if the window kink in the A-pillar alongside the rear view mirrors in the Punto helped in side-frontal visibility. Short answer - No.
15. A sedan in India makes very little sense, more so for someone who doesn't have a family (like me). Although I had never owned a hatch in the US/Middle East, I have grown to become a big fan. The easy go anywhere, park anywhere attitude coupled with decent FE numbers has gotten me hooked. The only sedans in India that I like are the Laura and Civic and both are way too big (for Indian conditions, not abroad though). I was at a hairdressing salon over the weekend and managed to parallel park the Polo in a tight space in a nearby street, something that would've been impossible with any sedan (except an Indigo CS maybe>.
I got a chance to extensively test drive a "Squeeze" green Figo Titanium diesel and "Chill" silver-grey ZXI petrol earlier today and would be glad to answer any queries on comparing the three cars. The Figo is certainly a nice car but I couldn't bring myself to like the bland styling and SUV-ish rear. The differences between the two top end trims is essentially down to safety features- ABS and airbags. There are a couple of other gimmicky differences as well, such as "anti drip wiping" but I feel that's just desperation on the part of Ford to differentiate between the two trim levels.