Quote:
Originally Posted by sumitkalindi Very true, but IMHO the increase will not be very high, and with AC the higher charges will account for the rise in running costs.
Now the thing is, it all depends on how much ac bookings you get, if your bus runs mainly in ac mode, it makes better sense to install engine mounted compressor. If you are not sure, better play safe with an auxiliary engine. That way you can keep the engine switched off if ac is not needed. |
the part marked in bold is exactly what i had thought.
Our AC bus would have mostly non-AC trips!!! Thats the reason, i am thinking of going for a 114 bhp engine with slave/auxiallry engine for AC.
But then, BHPians tell me its a headache to maintain the extra engine, it is prone to issues, etc.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Blue Thunder I can give some inputs as a consumer : my daily commute is by company-provided A/C bus , 70kms per day :-)
The bus is a Prakash-body-built-on-AL with A/C running off main engine, with sliding window glass, 40 push-back seats, good quality interiors (since A/C venting is required). The A/C (evaporator ?) unit is roof-mounted ThermoKing.
I do not know the detailed specs, but it is definitely not the 177HP-ODGB unit. But the engine power is quite sufficient to run the A/C, and it can move briskly thru the OMR traffic, no signs of being underpowered, due to the A/C running off the main engine. |
If its a 40 seater, then it maybe built on the 12M chassis with the 114 bhp engine. but then, that would make it underpowered.
it its a viking, then i am curious on how they could accommodate 40 seats in it. is the legroom sufficient? since you mentioned, its not at all underpowered with AC on, it could be the 132 or 167 bhp Viking chassis.
Quote:
This seems to meet most of your key requirements, raj_5004 : you probably dont need to look at other chassis and body-builder combos, it probably would make better business sense to buy the AL Viking (with an engine which can comfortably run the AC ) chassis, and get the Prakash body with sliding window glass.
|
yes, that makes sense. If the Viking can accommodate 40 P/B seats, then nothing like it. i can go for the 132 PS Viking chassis instead of the 114 PS & run the AC off the main engine. it doesnt matter then even if the bus is running on a non-AC trip as it wont drink as much fuel as the 177 bhp 12M bus. So i dont need to think about the auxillary engine as well.
Quote:
My vote, from a purely consumer-based viewpoint, would be for Prakash.
From what I know, all 'ABT-X travels' bus bodies are 'P8000-X2 Classic' from Prakash.
These are with sealed windows : no sliding-glass opeenable windows. Attachment 423547 |
Thanks for the info buddy. After i get the quotation from AL regarding the chassis, i will ask Prakash about the available dates & seat configurations.
Quote:
Originally Posted by teamveevee Not sure what exactly you mean, but if you just watch the buses at places like Munnar, you see more A/C mini buses(Force and Lynx) with tourists than the big buses. Also more seats means more taxes. What i have seen is, for weddings etc, the no of seats does not matter, it will be overloaded anyway. By the time you get the bus, the major wedding season will be over and just in time for the Sabarimala season, i dont think there will be much demand from Piligrims for the A/C bus. |
the person i was talking about runs a tourism business & he takes group bookings, as in a group of 30-40 people, so he regularly hires a 40 seater AC bus.
Now i have the following choices in the chassis:
(if Viking can accommodate 40 P/B seats)
1) AL Viking 114 PS with Slave engine for AC
2) AL Viking 132 PS with AC running on main engine
(if Viking cannot accommodate 40 P/B seats)
3) AL 12M 114 PS with slave engine for AC
4) AL 12M 177 PS with AC running on main engine