Some pictures:
Shot while on my way to drive home the Nano, what amazes me is how the manufacturer has printed the date of manufacture and the MRP on the sidewall. The ISI mark is at 10 o'clock, next to that is the date of manufacture (June 2011) at 11 o'clock position and next to that the MRP at between 12 and 1 o'clock position. A far better way of educating the customers, don't you think?
The engine bay: Unlike the 2011 Nano I test-drove, the engine bay gets some base in the form of a sheet attached at the bottom. Though this reduces the chance of bags falling down onto the road, it being an engine bay it's best if no luggage is stored here (this tip is for those who still believe the Nano has a boot at the front!).
A close-up of the bay: You can see the petrol tank inlet on the right of the spare tyre.
A sideways glance:
The front fogs: good enough to illuminate anything in front, but yet to see how they can light up any part of the road.
The rear (three-quarters?) view:
The hatch door does NOT open! It's been rivetted to the body shell. A security guard at a mall found this out the funny way when he went to the rear and tried opening it. We all had a laugh, including the guard. Thankfully he didn't insist on opening the 'other' boot!
Notice the two slats of the rear grill? This grill protects the engine, but if you see how these slats can be easily bent by hand, you wonder if the protection should have been sturdier.
The LX stamp. Apart from the BS4 sticker on the left, the rear is free of decals. I like the clean looks.
The full-wheel caps come as standard on the LX. Lends a premium look to the car.
The Nano mudflaps: Complimentary from the dealer along with floor mats.
The centre console: Illumination is good, however the upward-sloping console reflects into the front windscreen. Not to mention its positioning means you sacrifice some much-needed visibility.
The passenger-side ORVM: A much needed addition to the accessories list. There's no knob to adjust the mirror internally, you need to push gently on the glass to position it to your liking. Visibility is satisfactory with no obvious blind spots.
The running-in instructions and tips for achieving better FE stuck to the top right of the windscreen. A good effort, only the car refuses to run smoothly at 60kmph in the fourth gear. Third is the best for speeds upto 60kmph.
The internal mirror, provides good coverage of the area at the back. The driving position is high, so you cannot spot easily any obstacles below the window line immediately at the front or at the rear of the car. But that's not exactly a flaw of the Nano.
The profile view, again: The LX comes with tinted glasses.
Decked with a garland, ready to be delivered:
The roof-line of the Nano is above the i10 (foreground): The camera angle does not reveal this clearly, but the Nano is a notch taller than the i10, probably even the Santro.
The vent in the centre console: The flap circled in the pic can be shut independently, leaving just half the vent open. Cool, but unfortunately it's not availble in all the vents.
The tall gear stick easily falls to hand. The shifting isn't smooth though, you actually feel it shifting between the gates. And if you miss slotting it correctly it will make such an awful racket, the passers-by will rush to your rescue. Ahead of the shifter is the classic ergonomic blunder called the power window switches. Having to lower the window six times enroute for toll, I suspect if it's an attempt by the Tatas to keep the Nano drivers fit in the tummy area.
The handbrake and a small recess below it. The white box there is the spare headlamp provided with the car.
The view out of the front windscreen. Look carefully and you will see how much the dash and the console reflect upward. This is a royal pain in the eyes, whether day or night, made worse by street lights. Either opt for black interiors or get a dash cover pronto!
The view at 45 degrees is severely obstructed by the thick A-pillar: I have to crane my neck to check for oncoming vehicles and other obstacles when negotiating small lanes.
The passenger side offers a better view than the driver's side. Of course it's largely helped by the wide windscreen and the quarter glass.
The mirror is all water droplets: An extended hood might have ensured the mirror surface remains dry.
The panel gaps (oops, there are none!): The dash seems to have been well put together. The dash gives out a premium feel ...
Till you spot this: The whole piece of upholstery is loose, probably not fitted back properly after the wiring etc? Or the cost-cutting?
The straight ahead vision:
The steering position is a tad too low: it could have been shifted up by an inch or two for a more comfortable feeling. Also notice how the wiper and the centre console block the view.
