![]() |
Originally Posted by sheelz
(Post 3589618)
I want tyre which can enhance the look of the vehicle. Mostly it will be driven on road. Thanks. |
Originally Posted by Live To Jive
(Post 3590473)
Would these tyres be suitable for use on a MM550 or Thar? |
Originally Posted by Rattler
(Post 3604556)
Hi L.o.R, The 35 inch tall tyre would definitely reduce both approach and departure angles. Because of the size, the steering lock positions on either side will have to be re adjusted so that the tyre doesn' brush against the wheel well / fenders. In my opinion, the turning radius of the Jeep will go up by at least 15% with the 9.00x16 size tyres. (Jeep Guru's please enlighten us on this) Using of spacers can solve this problem but, they are not recommended for OTR activity. Best regards, Sudhir. |
Originally Posted by lifeoffroad
(Post 3604615)
Sudhir, I am glad you brought up turning radius and track width into this discussion. I would not want to use spacers, especially in a vehicle meant for off road use. But having said that, what about using axles that are wider that the stock axles? For example, load carriers such as Tata 407 Etc. do coming in 4X4 Avatars and the track width of such vehicles would be roughly be about 62 inches give or take a couple of inches. Any thoughts? Regards, L.o.R |
Originally Posted by Rattler
(Post 3604911)
I won't be able to comment on this L.o.R. I suggest that you take expert opinion on this issue. Having wider axils that of a Tata 407 along with bigger tyres will drain the torque of the original Jeep engine due to the dead weight hence, may require a bigger engine transplant, mated to a transfer case etc, etc. Best regards, Sudhir. |
Originally Posted by lifeoffroad
(Post 3605023)
Please help me list the pros and cons of using a larger axle, say from a Tata 407 4X4 or any such vehicle in a Jeep. In US terms, this would be the move from lets say a Dana 40 to a Dana 60 axle. |
Originally Posted by Rattler
(Post 3604556)
The 35 inch tall tyre would definitely reduce both approach and departure angles. |
Because of the size, the steering lock positions on either side will have to be re adjusted so that the tyre doesn' brush against the wheel well / fenders. In my opinion, the turning radius of the Jeep will go up by at least 15% with the 9.00x16 size tyres. |
Using of spacers can solve this problem but, they are not recommended for OTR activity. |
Originally Posted by Rattler
(Post 3604911)
Having wider axils that of a Tata 407 along with bigger tyres will drain the torque of the original Jeep engine due to the dead weight hence, may require a bigger engine transplant, mated to a transfer case etc, etc. . |
Originally Posted by lifeoffroad
(Post 3605023)
Please help me list the pros and cons of using a larger axle, say from a Tata 407 4X4 or any such vehicle in a Jeep. In US terms, this would be the move from lets say a Dana 40 to a Dana 60 axle. Please bear in mind that the same would be used with 35+ inches tyre and the torque loss because of the same would be accounted for. |
Originally Posted by dhanushs
(Post 3605586)
Hi, If you just need wider axles, go for 57" ones. And to account for larger tyres, change the final drive ratio. Lots of combinations available. You will be good to go. |
Originally Posted by lifeoffroad
(Post 3605722)
Hi Dhanushs, Also, I have seen the internals for this axle and the half shaft are definitely beefier than that of a Jeep and also, it is a four pinion design, fully floating in the rear. This added strength should help when it comes to the added stresses with respect to the lower gearing that would be needed. Thanks, L.o.R |
Originally Posted by Shubhendra
(Post 3622367)
Why you need axles of Tata 407 ? Jeep axles are very strong and its RARE to break them. I hope you will find below information useful. This information was posted by none other than Jeep expert Arka on a different portal (4wd4all.com) The Tata 407 Specs Front - Steyr-Oerlikon Type with 4.6:1 Ratio CV Axle & 4 Pinion Carrier. Left Off-Set Rear - Steyr-Oerlikon Type with 4.6:1 Ratio & 4 Pinion Carrier FFRA with Centre Diff. T-Case - Steyr-Oerlikon with 2H-4L Single Speed Divorced T-Case (2.02:1) Regards, Shubhendra Singh |
Originally Posted by lifeoffroad
(Post 3623579)
With the increase in tire size and additional torque/gearing, the chances of failure do increase. The consideration of a axle from a higher payload vehicle was to negate this and ensure reliability. |
All times are GMT +5.5. The time now is 15:58. |