![]() | #16 |
BHPian Join Date: May 2008 Location: Mumbai
Posts: 218
Thanked: 28 Times
| ![]() Oh I think it is getting very interesting, so I also thought of putting my view point in it. For me you should asses yourself first that what you want from vehicle and what is your adventurous quotient. For example you should categorize your self into two categories 1. Adventurous 2. Extreme Adventurous If you are adventurous and want to stick to OTR’s for 8 to 10 years buy Thar If you are Extreme Adventurous and do OTR’s and may like to do rallies & high speed Off-roading then go for Gypsy. Gypsy is a vehicle which can take any amount of torture without making a hole into your pocket. It is an extremely reliable vehicle even at high speeds. With due respect to everyone based on my experience from Raid-de-Himalaya I can tell you that the gypsy was the best performer. We survived the full rally without a single break down and without any service backup. Whereas the Scorpios who secured 1st & 2nd position in Adventure category was attended by their service team every day. To my surprise there was hardly any Mahindra vehicle in Extreme Category, from 1st to last it was all dominated by Gypsies. I simply don’t understand when Scorpio is winning in RDH adventure category, why they always stay away from Extreme category. As a common man I feel they are afraid of testing their vehicle against gypsies in those extreme conditions. I don’t know the weight of Thar but again I feel when it come to “Weight to Power” ratio Gypsy is a winner. |
![]() | ![]() |
|
![]() | #17 |
BHPian Join Date: Jun 2010 Location: Chennai
Posts: 411
Thanked: 51 Times
| ![]() Jaggu - I'm sure you have a wishlist. Why don't you put it into an Excel and then start rating these vehicles on a scale of 10. More importanty, share that in this forum so that others can use it too. ![]() Question on the test drive though - Is M&M going to give us off road test drives? If not how can we really evaluate such a vehicle? And if they do, they might be doing only one TD a day. ![]() |
![]() | ![]() |
![]() | #18 | ||||||
Team-BHP Support ![]() Join Date: May 2004 Location: Bangalore
Posts: 18,909
Thanked: 10,418 Times
| ![]() Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
My apologies for being devil's advocate, siding for both the vehicles. But yes you have a very valid point, Gypsy's are to a great extent indestructible and tried and tested product. Who know's Thar might just change the scene in the Raid in the coming years. Quote:
Yup! for now i will have to rely more on any official test drive reports by auto journals/forum. I feel M&M should do what Ford did with Endeavor few years back. Create an offroad track and then invite potential customers to TD so that they get some chance to really test the vehicle. I think Toyota also did the same with Fortuner. M&M you listening??? Last edited by Jaggu : 24th December 2010 at 18:32. | ||||||
![]() | ![]() |
![]() | #19 |
BHPian Join Date: Oct 2008 Location: Margao goa
Posts: 365
Thanked: 90 Times
| ![]() Jaggu, we are all in the same boat, and sailing pretty roughly so to say, my wife is fed up with my Tharonomics and Tharabilities, i have my white MM550, selling it for 3 lacs ??? and buying a Thar with all the mods and additions u have quoted looks quite expensive, 550 is a pretty capable off roader, we all know that, will the thar be worth it, as like you i might drive to a max of 1-1.5 k a month?? as regards cruising ability on the highway, how many highway journeys do we actually do on a jeep, as regards outstation OTrs, they might be for 7-8 times a year, and anyways i have the 550 Xdp, 5 speed, so cruising for me is not such a great problem, so i think i stay with the 550, but a new vehicle the Thar is it. ![]() ** your thinking and being in confused mode prompts me to ask, are you a libran by any chance??? ![]() |
![]() | ![]() |
![]() | #20 |
Distinguished - BHPian ![]() | ![]() Jaggu - you're better off with the Thar. |
![]() | ![]() |
![]() | #21 |
BHPian Join Date: Jun 2005 Location: mumbai
Posts: 369
Thanked: 882 Times
| ![]() What a jeep can do, a gypsy will manage somehow (given the lower torque of the petrol mill). However the vice-versa isnt always true. Have seen this many times especially in slush and steep climbs when a run up is required and weight plays a key role. BUT this was with traditional MM jeeps and the Thar could change that. I think you have already outlined the limitations and advantages of the Gypsy and the Thar. So decide ![]() |
![]() | ![]() |
![]() | #22 | |
Senior - BHPian Join Date: Jul 2006 Location: bangalore
Posts: 1,647
Thanked: 1,844 Times
| ![]() Quote:
Gypsy can withstand far more abuse than any other vehicle out there. Its not just on the raid or the rally circuit. In INRC, while navigating in an esteem, we used to run and work on our car like crazy during the service time. Now in a gypsy, we use the same time to catch our breath and relax as hardly anything breaks on a gypsy. | |
![]() | ![]() |
![]() | #23 | |
Team-BHP Support ![]() Join Date: May 2004 Location: Bangalore
Posts: 18,909
Thanked: 10,418 Times
| ![]() Quote:
For you no reason to upgrade, coz 550 is pretty decent even on highways. And am the Crab ![]() But why Mag? Will look good along with your new? ![]() | |
![]() | ![]() |
|
![]() | #24 |
Senior - BHPian | ![]() That is too harsh!! There is a definite reason for me not to disclose it at this point, however I will not run without updating my thread with necessary details. Now tell me how is my OverDrive setup feedback going to help this thread in anyway, If I understand you were clearly asking everyone to post comments on only Thar or Gypsy mode. No OffTopic ![]() Last edited by trammway : 24th December 2010 at 19:50. |
![]() | ![]() |
![]() | #25 |
Senior - BHPian | ![]() If only a 2nd vehicle, max 5-7K Kms a year - i would go for a new gypsy. Why? Less complicated Any mech can help you with it almost anywhere. Lesser parts inside the hood (point 1) If you can clone it to spidey-2, it is on par/above par with a Thar-Crde (and have spoa ![]() Oil service bills are faar less than a ~7-liter sump'd thar You can have FFE and K&N You can do the spiti loop with out opening a 'can a thar do it' thread - Tanveers numerous queries about high altitude testing has no replies till date Maruti Vs Mahindra Raju cant fix a thar (will do eventually) You wont be flagged down 10 times on the way to udupi ![]() Swastik Fabs makes more parts for a Gypsy than a thar..!! Will come up with more... |
![]() | ![]() ![]() |
![]() | #26 |
Team-BHP Support ![]() | ![]() Want my honest advice? Think with your heart, then with your head, and you'll only have one answer : RETAIN THE CJ3B! I don't know of anyone who would own a truly iconic Jeep like the petrol CJ3B, a well-maintained one at that, and sell it for the Thar. You have got to be kidding me. Does the light weight, SWB non-IFS have an advantage off the road? You bet. Is the Thar better on road? Sure, but you do have other cars right? Since you have the luxury of owning more than 1 car, get your priorities right.....a proper car for the road (i.e. Swift diesel) and a proper Jeep for off road (i.e. your CJ3B). Cars come and go. In '97 there was the Classic. Then there was the Gurkha. Today, there is the Thar. Tomorrow there will be another. BUT THERE IS NO REPLACEMENT FOR AN ICON. Would you agree that only a nutjob would sell an immaculately maintained W126 V8 for a new E Class? Or a 50's Beetle trade-in for a 2010? Or a '67 Mustang for a new? You own a classic, you own a special breed...you have a beautiful, capable offroader in the CJ3B. Anyone can buy a Thar and go wheeling, only a true connoisseur has a CJ in his garage. Selling your CJ for a Thar is sacrilege!! Now, if you didn't own a 4x4, I'd suggest the Thar over the Gypsy 99 times of 100. But as things stand, keep your Jeep. Hey, you'll save some money too. Invest that $$$, use the Swift for another couple of years, and then combine them both (Swift resale + investment) for a killer street car. That way, you have a tarmac burner and an offroad king, BOTH, in your garage. Sometimes in life, a specialist approach is better than being a generalist. P.S. For the record, I am putting my money where my mouth is. The Classic in my garage ain't making way for any Thar. Last edited by GTO : 24th December 2010 at 20:17. |
![]() | ![]() ![]() |
![]() | #27 | |
Senior - BHPian | ![]() Quote:
Allow me to correct the "sigaar" - it is CIGAR. No offence bro, just loved the comaprison & thought I should correct the oversight ![]() Cheers | |
![]() | ![]() |
![]() | #28 |
BHPian Join Date: Aug 2009 Location: Dubai / Gods Own Country -Kerala
Posts: 864
Thanked: 471 Times
| ![]() Jaggu, As your thread topic says..I think this thread itself is unreasonable and should be closed! Come one man give me a break!! Out of all the people here.. you are in a dilemma!! I cant believe it!! Or is this kind of a joke or April Fool thingy!! ![]() Moderators please close this thread! ![]() Jokes apart.. as GTO said.. listen to your heart and go with what it says!! I know you haven't even thought of selling your dWarf even in your wildest dreams and you are looking for a 2nd offroader. But I don't think I am qualified to recommend you any 4x4!! Mr Moderator Jaggu! You should be knowing it better than a lot of us here. Merry XMas to you and your loved ones!! JC |
![]() | ![]() |
![]() | #29 |
Distinguished - BHPian ![]() | ![]() 1. The ~70K price difference you've calculated is not tangible for the usability offered by the diesel Thar over the petrol Gypsy, especially considering the long-term keep you've foreseen. If there were a diesel Gypsy, then it would be fairly lopsided then. 2. I like the Thar - in white (hint), and want to borrow it from you quite frequently. Moderator Jaggu will be infracted shortly for teasing. Last edited by theMAG : 24th December 2010 at 21:02. |
![]() | ![]() |
![]() | #30 |
Senior - BHPian Join Date: Sep 2009 Location: Chennai
Posts: 1,400
Thanked: 120 Times
| ![]() Jaggu, I have a response which you might not quite like, its almost the same thing I had mentioned in the Thar thread. All you have to do is wait for Thar to be a success and not buy it. I can bet MSIL would be looking at the Thar launch with close watch. Just if the Thar becomes a success expect MSIL to bring in a cool form of Gypsy with DDiS Engine and slightly better looks. I am sure this will happen it Thar clocks in good numbers. The reason MSIL have kept Gypsy alive for so long is because they see that the product still have some life in it in generations to come, if Thar succeds you will surely get a freshened Gypsy |
![]() | ![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
![]() | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Hyundai India, unreasonable long term maintenance and service practices! | Jaggu | The Indian Car Scene | 554 | 20th August 2019 13:04 |
Mahindra publishes my image on Thar website without permission. EDIT: Resolved | amolpol | Shifting gears | 34 | 14th April 2015 12:28 |
Another quick (mostly FIAT lovers) meet in Kochi | hydrashok | The Team-BHP Meet Section | 25 | 31st August 2011 17:31 |
Neelkanteshwar, Pune : A great one-day destination; mostly unexplored. | pjbiju | Travelogues | 35 | 3rd January 2011 14:29 |