Guys I see there is a big fuss on stereo vs mono subs.
Before getting into the details of explaination I would suggest, don't mix car audio and 5.1 home audio.
In 5.1 home audio the bass is mastered and recorded mono as seperate channel which is the .1 and a lot of home theatre subs has one input by the name of LFE (Low frequency effects) rather than L+R, in some one of them is indicated as LFE. The Decoders and Recievers and Car Audio DVD players has one output for sub.
Ideally in home cinema all you need is one sub, you will need to add more only in the case you crave for more SPL.
You will rarely come across any audiophiles with high end stereo setup using subwoofers in house.
Now come to car audio. Ideally there should be full range representaion of music in the front stage. But thats not possible because of the limitation of installing big drivers in the front. So you have to use the subwoofers in the back of the car (the only place to accomodate them). Which gives rise to problems like delay in bass, disintegrated sound, phase errors etc. Which can be taken care of by electronics to some extent.
Stereo bass vs mono bass in the car :
Lot of bassheads will never accept the stereo bass in their cars because their main objective in the whole sound reproduction is the bass quantity which will always be more in the case of mono.
In-between two subwoofers playing stereo and mono, mono will be louder as the signal is summed, amplified and the two subwoofers are powered by identical signal, they are perfectly in phase in their entire bandwidth of bass reproduction.
Stereo bass in car is only possible if the HU is really giving out stereo signal in sub out, in most cases it is the summed L+R output available in parallel for convenience to use 2ch / 4ch amps. In this case the subs will play mono, does not matter how do you wire them. You can check this by hooking the subwoofers in stereo and see if balance works on them or not.
If not the debate of stereo vs mono bass in the car audio ends in this case.
Ideally one should have stereo bass in the car (only SQ users) it complements the front stage and imaging very well. Lot of users has single subwoofers running mono and the box is ideally in one corner. Now listen to the familiar track with good musical bass sitting in the driver seat and then in the passenger seat the bass will not sound the same there will definitely be a difference, even if you call it as omnidirectional, difficult to localise. But it will not sound right.
If you have stereo subwoofers this will not happen. It will be the same.
The reason why it happens in mono bass is that the frontstage is stereo and bass is mono so it cannot complement the L & R midbass/midrange at the same time. So there can be peaks in bass which are not required so you end up tuning them with eq.
This is the reason why the subwoofers are not used in the stereo setups in home audio. The integration between the speakers and subwoofer in home audio is very difficult. I have tried a lot of times from budget components to ultra high end, bottom line is it just does not work.
On the other hand we can achieve that in car audio by using electronics for adjusting delay, crossover, level, eq in each driver (talking about active system). Even in passive system you can take care of delay, phase and eq to a certain extent but not as extensive as active system.
In a well recorded music with real instruments Left and Right channel will never have same amount of bass energy because of the placement of instruments and microphones on the stage. So the left and right subwoofers will never have the same output. If you sum the signal then the output will be same, hence more but at the cost of loosing detail and seperation.
We are not talking about infrasonic frequencies (<20Hz) where the detail and seperation does not matter we are talking about music reproduction in the band of 20Hz - 80/100Hz which one can hear and distinguish very well and it does matter. Try using 20Hz subsonic filter on the sub it will sound different with the filter on and off. The difference is noticable because you can hear the effect of filter at 20Hz
Today companies are spending money in R&D of high frequency drivers capable of reproducing frequencies above 20Khz. Even there are dedicated super tweeters which are used to reproduce HF from 10-15Khz to 54Khz. Now if we go theoretically humans cannot listen above 20Khz but brain does recognises frequencies above that, one might not notice but it definitely adds to listening pleasure. If our listening band width is 20-20Khz why the hell do we need expensive supertweeters, preamps / amps with frequency response of 5Hz - 100Khz.
Stereo was a big improvement over mono and even today the most advanced 5.1 system cannot touch the stereo setup in music reproduction. And the reproduction of full spectrum in stereo does matter.
I am running 2 X IDQ 12 in stereo on bridged McIntosh MCC404M amplifier. The HU is Mcintosh MX5000 with 4 preouts which goes to MCC404M powering the speakers and the pre-out from this goes to sub amp. The sublevel is controlled by remote bass knob. The integration, timing, kick of bass in front stage, both left and right channel is immaculate which is hard to achieve in case of mono unless you keep the LPF below 50Hz. In which case you have the speakers struggling to play down to 50Hz.
Idea of going stereo is definitely better over mono in case you listen to music with real instruments and want serious SQ system. On top of it if you have the HU which permits sub out in stereo. |