Quote:
Originally Posted by Tarrodie For anyone looking for a convenient city runabout for going to office and a weekend family outing inside the city or nearby, this is it. As well as for those with a sedan or SUV but need a second car that offers convenience for quick errands and ease of parking.
It has ample space, comfortable ride and good handling which is what over 90% of car owners really care for. They don't care for 0 to 60 and 0 to 100 timings because whether it is any big or small city you hardly get a chance to use those figures unless you want to knock down bikers or worse drag people with your car. With all the still missing items and not-so-latest EV technology hopefully they are getting ready to offer the cherry on top - the low pricing. But, if priced high it is ta-ta bye-bye from Indian consumers. |
Very true. The eC3 spec is well designed for target buyer segment. On top of ease of driving and comfort, several things that will attract buyers:
1.
Range: Even the 'Long Range' version of Tiago gives you only 180-190km in real life. Media drives are indicating a range of approx. 230 km for eC3 with a wee bit more on eco mode. eC3will be much more practical than tiago for people with longer commutes and frequent trips to nearby towns and cities say in a 200km range.
For example, tiago needs an extra stop on Mumbai-Pune expressway for fast charging, but eC3 could do it without stopping. And DC fast chargers on Mumbai-Pune route already witness waiting times during weekends and holidays. So, a 30-minute 50% charge can sometimes take another hour's wait. DC fast charging also makes the trip costlier in a tiago, though it will still be cheaper than a petrol car.
2. The eC3
boot space makes it much better for a weekend trip. tiago's boot is much smaller.
3. In urban traffic as well as weekend trips, a
higher seating position improves visibility and makes it easier to navigate. Kudos to Citroen for not calling eC3 an SUV, but many of us (fed on a diet of tall boys like WagonR, Ritz, i10, or pseudo micro-SUVs like Venue/Sonet/Kiger/Magnite) don't like the tiago style low-seated driving position for daily driving.
4.
Drivability: Team-BHP review says - "You won't have issues with quick overtakes and closing the gaps in the city, but don't expect an electrifying pace here." Other media drive reports also indicate acceleration is good. This will keep most target buyers happy. Performance thrill seekers will continue to look at sport mode on tiago LR or Nexon EV max.
Looks like Citroen has tuned eC3 for real life drivability for average buyers and not spec sheet comparisons. Lower nominal power rating despite higher torque indicates Citroen has current-limited the battery/ rev-limited the motor for safety in high ambient temperatures. The engineering design and known LFP resilience against thermal degradation suggests there is some truth to Citroen claim that battery is good even for 55C ambient temperature.
eC3 has a radiator/liquid cooling for the motor. Liquid cooling for the battery would have allowed eC3 to be a hot hatch and a true electric avatar of the turbo petrol, but Citroen has decided to sacrifice that for lower cost knowing that most of their target buyers don't want to pay for that performance. (Who knows we may get a performance version eC3 Aircross one day

)
5. I was worried about the battery pack visible below the floor in initial reveal pictures. Team-bhp review pics show good underfloor protection across the car, and this is important for peace of mind. Interestingly, the battery enclosure seems designed with lot of space for air flow below the battery (between the battery and underfloor protection plate) with slots/fins providing surface area for cooling. It means actual battery is higher than the protection plate visible from the sides.
Now it depends upon how effectively Citroen markets eC3's advantages and the pricing. For a car designed for aggressive pricing, Citroen must go all out for the best possible pricing. They need that buzz.
eC3 does not have tiago's techie and premium feel. e.g. look at the old-school key. Citroen is betting this is not as important to most of their target buyer segment that wants an honest to goodness, value for money car. Optional accessories like alloys and rear-view camera will take care of some of the asks.
There are two misses that I personally dislike:
1. Absence of cruise control in the higher variant, as it would have allowed buyers to extract max range on the highway. Per car cost to implement basic cruise control on EVs is low, as it only needs software running with existing sensors and controllers (and only a few buttons and wiring needed for set/reset/adjust cruise speeds. eC3 steering has blank space on the left-hand side.)
2. The knees-up rear bench seating may hurt the long drive comfort of the petrol C3, just like nexon ev max. Perhaps, there is headroom to raise the rear seat by 1-1.5 inch and increase cushioning on the front part of the rear bench.