Team-BHP - The Official non-auto Image thread
Team-BHP

Team-BHP (https://www.team-bhp.com/forum/)
-   Et Cetera (https://www.team-bhp.com/forum/et-cetera/)
-   -   The Official non-auto Image thread (https://www.team-bhp.com/forum/et-cetera/4477-official-non-auto-image-thread-408.html)

Quote:

Originally Posted by gd1418 (Post 1417036)
Aha, "angoor ka ras". Isn't that an acronym for wine...:uncontrol

i knew it was coming lol:

so here is the bottle that we used. it says at the bottom it is non alcoholic. sorry for the bad quality.

Quote:

Originally Posted by chevelle (Post 1417054)
i knew it was coming
so here is the bottle that we used. it says at the bottom it is non alcoholic. sorry for the bad quality.

It's a mocktail, not a cocktail then... :)

Quote:

Originally Posted by clevermax (Post 1417228)
It's a mocktail, not a cocktail then... :)

i am not too aware of the term mocktail/cocktail and what's the difference, but bottle said cocktail. so i thought it must be cocktail.

on other note, yesterday being rakhi day(rakshabandhan), i managed to click a full moon with help of newly acquired 5200d tripod.

A view from restuarant " Little Italy" in Hyderabad. This was shot with a 15-sec exposure:)

Nice one there chevelle... Here is one from my side, im not happy, too much noise and detail is missing. Was trying different settings.

Night shots with long exposures are always very fascinating.. good shot mobike008

Quote:

Originally Posted by chevelle (Post 1418175)
i am not too aware of the term mocktail/cocktail and what's the difference, but bottle said cocktail. so i thought it must be cocktail.

on other note, yesterday being rakhi day(rakshabandhan), i managed to click a full moon with help of newly acquired 5200d tripod.

I don't understand why do we need a tripod to shoot the moon. What's the exif? I use very high shutter speeds (1/500 or more) so I never felt the need for a tripod.

Quote:

Originally Posted by s0uljah (Post 1419581)
Nice one there chevelle... Here is one from my side, im not happy, too much noise and detail is missing. Was trying different settings.

Which camera is this? Yes there is much noise.

@s0uljah,chevelle: Where is the original color of the moon? :)

Just now shot the full moon. Hand-held shot again. Just a point and shoot attempt but with a DSLR.

The Official non-auto Image thread-fullmoon.jpg

Exif: 1/800 seconds, F/4, ISO 100. Focal length 315mm (full frame equiv) 210 mm APS-C

Quote:

Originally Posted by clevermax (Post 1419854)
I don't understand why do we need a tripod to shoot the moon. What's the exif? I use very high shutter speeds (1/500 or more) so I never felt the need for a tripod.



@s0uljah,chevelle: Where is the original color of the moon? :)


The tripod was new, so just wanted to try it out. basically learn how to use it. as i have never used a tripod before. so i was panning and adjusting the camera all the while getting to know it. i have shot moon hand handled too. not a big deal.

this is the original color of the moon. its just crop to current size so i can upload here. have done nothing to this. i have another same photo if at all you want to see.

here is the exif
camera model: sony dsc h50
flash mode: no
focal length: 78mm
f-number: F/4.5
Exposure time: 1/640 second
Metering mode: Pattern
Exposure Compensation: 0 step
iso 80
optical zoom: 15x

this is all i could find in windows picture manager. if i missed something let me know.

Quote:

Originally Posted by clevermax (Post 1419854)
Which camera is this? Yes there is much noise.

@s0uljah,chevelle: Where is the original color of the moon? :)

40D

Original colour as per RAW shooting in camera is this.. WB settings also will change the colour

:p

Quote:

Originally Posted by chevelle (Post 1419975)
this is the original color of the moon. its just crop to current size so i can upload here. have done nothing to this. i have another same photo if at all you want to see.
.

Well, to my eyes it has a blue color cast. The moon in your picture appears too white. To naked eyes, Moon looks a bit yellow, doesn't it?

It must be your WB settings, who's the culprit here.

I have not done any color adjustments in the picture that I've posted. Just worked on the brightness (RGB) curve, so it might have increased the saturation a little bit, but the hue is the same as that of the original RAW image.

Sorry to be going off topic here, but!!!!

Guys, can you suggest me a free software on the net to download for stitching pics to create a panorama.

I had put the same question a few days back in the PS thread but didnt get any reply.

Quote:

Originally Posted by deky (Post 1420517)
Sorry to be going off topic here, but!!!!

Guys, can you suggest me a free software on the net to download for stitching pics to create a panorama.

I had put the same question a few days back in the PS thread but didnt get any reply.

I am not sure, but 'gimp' will surely have that feature.

Quote:

Originally Posted by deky (Post 1420517)
Sorry to be going off topic here, but!!!!

Guys, can you suggest me a free software on the net to download for stitching pics to create a panorama.

I had put the same question a few days back in the PS thread but didnt get any reply.

GIMP does not have this feature. However another open source program has this feature, and a lot more
hugin - Panorama photo stitcher
It can do perspective correction too!

A simple "apt-get install hugin" and it is on my computer. Will take it for a spin later. Thanks for the tip Tanveer.

Thats a cool software tsk, panorama are my favorites, good you asked this question deky.


All times are GMT +5.5. The time now is 01:22.