So i did take back to back test drives of Karoq and Superb last Sunday.
Interiors & Space: In terms of space, the Karoq appears quite compact on the outside as well as inside (this is coming after driving a Fabia regularly for last 8-9 years, occasional duties in 2nd gen city, Creta, Elantra, Seltos, WagonR and Fortuners of family, and drooling over a #Dark edition Harrier couple of days back). Did not feel much of an upgrade from Fabia in terms of driving space (maybe 20-25% in boot, and 10-15% interior wise (I am 6-2 in height and medium built, so the space perspective was very different for my co-passenger of 5-2 height). Though quality wise the dash and front layout appeared to be a big upgrade, and shall i say a notch above the L&K as well. The chunky gear knob from Kodiaq completely knocks out the one in Superb.
On the other hand, the front and rear space and comfort in Superb knocks out Karoq (which has not much to write about at rear space - and is much less), although took some effort to get out from the low seating position in Superb.
Coming to the boot, Superb of course boasts of the largest capacity, but for some reason it looked to be just a tad size smaller than the previous generations and multiple T-BHP posts (where one could literally lie down comfortably) - not sure if the size has been marginally squeezed or I was just expecting the cargo hold of an aircraft

, but definitely wayyy bigger than Karoq. To be honest, Karoq's boot while rated close to 500 litres on paper did not appear much bigger than the Seltos parked on the side - maybe when we start to actually pack the luggage it may be able to swallow more than expected.
Ride Quality: Both performed admirably, although to be honest, half of the test drive was on smooth highway and other half was on by-lane with mild road imperfections and some potholes. Karoq, like all notched up pseudo-SUVs, moved as expected over mild imperfections, and Superb acted like a true blue sedan. In fact when you are in driver's seat in the Superb, you do not feel its large dimensions - i was able to maneuver the turns just like i would do on my close to decade old Fabia - as pointed out in several T-BHP observations about Superb's hiding its size very well while driving.
Deal Breakers-Karoq: Given my primary requirement is space (both inside and in boot), with a heavy heart moved Karoq off the list - although it is a very attractive proposition in terms of interior quality, CBU unit, moon-roof.
Deal Breakers-Superb: Coming to the Superb, this ticks all the boxes in terms of size, space, new engine and gearbox, discounts and personal preference of a sedan (yes, i am one of the minority who still prefer a sedan ride over SUVs), even if the boot felt slightly small. However, i just happened to fixate over the "Long Term Fuel Efficiency" in the Superb which was just about 6 kmpl - and I triple checked, i was not looking at the instant fuel economy or the recent trip fuel economy. This freaked me out completely, as this car had just came from a long drive from Udaipur couple days back. while I could discount couple points for a test drive vehicle with multiple stop-starts and short trips, but 6 kmpl over long term is a complete deal breaker. It brought back nightmares of our old Contessa from childhood, which nobody wanted to touch (even in days when petrol costed just 20 bucks). In contrast, the same figure in the Karoq was about 12 kmpl.
May i request if anyone has had any reasonable long-term experience with the new 2.0 L engine and can clarify the fuel economy aspects. While i did expect average of about 8 kmpl in city and 10-12 kmpl on highway, 6-7 kmpl on highway is not acceptable. I would very much love to own this car and the price point is just irresistible, but don't want to end up with a guzzler that becomes un-drivable with the rising fuel prices.