Quote:
Originally Posted by Whenasked First of all if a car is produced for third world countries , it does NOT MEAN THAT IT IS INFERIOR. |
Not at all. Just like third-world countries are not inferior to first-world countries.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mpower Whats wrong with a 3rd world car. I for one dont want to scrape my underbelly and replace bent rims. |
Well, I've owned a lot of first-world cars, and I've never replaced a bent rim in my life. Or had one, for that matter. God knows I drive my cars to their limits. And why is it that we can export our very own Indica to Europe and other parts of the world, but Fiat does not see it fit for us to own a car that white people in Europe own? And to answer what's wrong, my pride is what's wrong.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Whenasked Buddy I have a 2001 Palio 1.2. It has never been broken down...in the past 6 years. I have travelled across KERALA, TAMILNADU & KARNATAKA with out any issues except for tyre punctures (may be thats also due to FIAT  ) . Now thats what I call reliablity & owner satisfaction. Do you get that feeling? . |
Yes, I do. I have driven across TN, AP, KL, KA, GA, MH, all in my Baleno. Not once has my car complained or even had a flat. But you don't see me tom-tomming it around. The simple fact is, we expect our cars to do that. But a Fiat owner thinks it's a big deal. And to answer your question about ultimate reliability, my car has proven its worth on the MMST track, which are some of the harshest driving conditions in India. On the same day, a Palio 1.6 limped home after breaking down. Do you have anything to add?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Whenasked You said MUL is not charity..same is with FIAT, if people buy 1.1 stile, FIAT will sell..aam junta dont mind two second delay !! |
But it doesn't seem to be selling. 2 TBHPians seem to have bought it, one without TDing any other cars, and he claims he cannot find another such car in the ITPL parking lot. And that's a 1000+ car park.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Whenasked I can see a tensed MUL, HYUNDAI because of FIAT's alliance with TATA & thats why all these posts against FIAT. |
Yes, MUL and Hyundai pay me 21 paise for every post I put up in favour of them or against Fiat. Grow up and get real.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Whenasked One more thing, if FIAT is so bad..why is that SWIFT from MUL having that FIAT engine on SWIFT. Its a shame.. isn't it.. with a borrowed stuff? |
I never said Fiat is bad. They have some wonderful engineering skills. If you look through my posts, I have said the Linea looks good and I am looking forward to it. I have driven Palios that would make all you F(iat)anatics drool for days on end, so don't give me your condescending attitude.
Quote:
Originally Posted by spadival Pretty simple actually..They cant compare apples with oranges and then come to a conclusion. They are comparing Palio which is arguably in the B+ segment with B segment cars like Xing and Spark !! Why not compare with the B+ segment cars like Getz Prime and U-VA. |
Fiat is positioning the Stile against these cars. And I think it's a fair competition if they are of the same engine capacity and within Rs 50k of each other.
Quote:
Originally Posted by goldie_malhotra Dont worry too much about it, dude. Only 1700 odd people tend to disagree with you every month, compared to the lakhs that agree. |
Eh? I have stated figures here. I don't think you can play around with them too much, except for FE and speed. Then too, the errors would be the same for all cars, so you would end up with a similar difference between competitors.
Thank you Harrie. You for one know the joys of owning both a 1.6 GTX, arguably the fastest this side of the Suez, and an OHC.