|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
![]() | #106 |
Senior - BHPian ![]() Join Date: Jul 2008 Location: in a Toyota!
Posts: 2,731
Thanked: 706 Times
| ![]() the ONLY reason why people buy diesel engine cars in india, is the diesel being cheaper compared to the price of petrol in india! that too because its subsidised by the govt for Agriculture sector! suppose the govt decides to provide diesel only to tractor, truck and taxi owners and restrict private car owners from diesel, then what? my argument is that when people are loaded with money and they buy MB, BMW etc in diesel, i never understand it! if diesel engine was so good and great, M3, R8, SLKs, Golf GTi, McLaren Ferrari, Lambo, etc would have been diesel and not petrol! |
![]() |
|
![]() | #107 |
Senior - BHPian ![]() | ![]() Diesel is a cleaner burning fuel and people around the world are moving towards Diesel, another reason is that in most of countries like UK/US, diesel and petrol are priced similarly unlike india and diesel cars give more or eual mileage. And gone are those days when diesel technology was considered inferior to Petrol, so the people who are talking about BMW diesel either havnt driven the latest diesel cars or they are not updated on latest technology. |
![]() |
![]() | #108 | |
Senior - BHPian ![]() Join Date: Jul 2008 Location: in a Toyota!
Posts: 2,731
Thanked: 706 Times
| ![]() Quote:
so much for diesel being cleaner!! | |
![]() |
![]() | #109 | |
Senior - BHPian ![]() | ![]() Quote:
In comparison, the petrol was heaven. Power was there whenever I wanted it, the car felt more nimble and maintaining high revs without being bothered about noise and vibration was never an issue. At idle, it was dead silent and it was so rev happy, maintaining 7k+ rpm was child's play. The only reason why anyone would buy a 530D over a 530i appears to be fuel economy. I can't think of any other reason. Also to be honest if you are such a penny pincher, why buy a bimmer in the first place! Totally ridiculous. | |
![]() |
![]() | #110 | |
BHPian Join Date: Sep 2006 Location: delhi/calgary
Posts: 286
Thanked: Once
| ![]() Quote:
oh so you mean all those who have diesels ( luxury sedans on the forum are penny pincher's ) i know now you will not accept what u just said , and u might have 100 reasons to justify what you said But thanks for enhancing my knowledge about luxury diesels , it seems me and many others on the forum were living on fools paradise who already bought or were buying 3 , 5 series X5 Q7 ,Q5 montero Toureg Mercedes S320 CDI E 280 cdi Ect ect Your test drive suggests that BMW and Merc and Audi should immediately stop selling diesels as they are good for generators only ( because buying diesels is totally ridiculos according to you ) And what should i say about all they auto journalists who charge us money for a magazines and tell us to buy diesel i suppose they also know nothing And last but not the least those who buy BIMMERS or Mercs understands money better than most this is my presumptions , I might be wrong again Its just that if you get same or better performance with more economy there is nothing to be " penny pincher " about it some cars are diesel but genuinely as good or better than there petrol counter parts ![]() Last edited by rubin2006 : 18th September 2009 at 20:02. | |
![]() |
![]() | #111 |
BHPian Join Date: Sep 2006 Location: delhi/calgary
Posts: 286
Thanked: Once
| ![]() This was posted on bimmer forum from a test report between petrol and diesel You would expect this high-pressure turbodiesel to win the fuel consumption contest. It does, hands down, achieving 37.2mpg in the EC Urban cycle, 10mpg better than the petrol model (and the advantage is even greater on long cruises): allegedly, the 13.9-gallon tank can get you from Calais to Nice with almost two gallons to spare. You might also expect the 320d to produce lower emissions; it does that handsomely and also soundly beats its German rivals in the process. If you expected the petrol model to be the victor in outright performance, you would be disappointed, apart from a nominal 1mph advantage in top speed. It is slower in the ritual sprint to 60mph, but above all loses out in the mid-range, the crucial factor in the real world. Faced with a series of uphill, tight bends, the 320d requires far fewer gearchanges and is quicker overall. ![]() The key to the 320d's impressive performance is that thumping torque, which trumps even Volkswagen's impressive new TDi. And now this is true i dont think any one's buying a diesel would a doing a ridiculous thing ( according to you ) buying a diesel just because he is " Penny pincher " ![]() |
![]() |
![]() | #112 | ||
Senior - BHPian ![]() | ![]() Quote:
There can be reasons for this : Either they dint TD both, Either they were less knowledgeable, Either they all were penny pichers, i am a bit confused here as everyday i see a huge flurry of beemers and mercs around me in streets (though i dont own any), still i see more diesels compared to petrol and buddy so many people cant be wrong. Quote:
Dont be so harsh in comparing the diesel engines used and their characteristics in buses and beemers. Its not a public transport thread and there are a lot of differences. so lets talk about diesel beemers please. Last edited by simply_sunny001 : 18th September 2009 at 23:54. | ||
![]() |
![]() | #113 | |
Senior - BHPian ![]() | ![]() Quote:
Why lose the refinement, the instantaneous power delivery and the rev happy engine for just a few rupees of fuel costs! | |
![]() |
|
![]() | #114 | |
BHPian ![]() | ![]() Quote:
Do you know how many people make less than 10 rupees a day in this country? I don't even want to get into this conversation with you, but simply put hopw much I make is not something I would use as a benchmark to judge myself by or take pride in of. India has more than a billion people, and it has a lot of people who have made it on their own. | |
![]() |
![]() | #115 |
BHPian Join Date: Oct 2007 Location: punjab
Posts: 213
Thanked: 5 Times
| ![]() Agreed Buddy. But my point was people were taking this thread to some other direction. It was'nt a show off at all. As I wrote in previous replies, thats its easy for anyone to spend one time, but spending again and again wont be economic for everyone. So was the reason I put up the question this way, so before someone jumps in with a suggestion, he should know that how much he can spend. |
![]() |
![]() | #116 | |
Senior - BHPian ![]() Join Date: Dec 2007 Location: Gurugram
Posts: 7,923
Thanked: 4,617 Times
| ![]() Quote:
Just to remind all a Delhi based NGO approached the courts to ban all diesel vehicles since they were more polluting than petrols. The courts ruled that the govt. can specify the specs and not the technology. the switch from ?? to CNG for public transport came out of the same litigation. There is another twist to this. By some who may know it was part of the Maruti - Tata tussle since the PIL was filed suspiciously at the time of the launch of the Indica! It is true that Diesel technology is now at leat as good as petrol. The emissions are different - SPM and NOx in diesels, CO etc. in petrols. | |
![]() |
![]() | #117 |
Senior - BHPian Join Date: Jul 2008 Location: Bangalore
Posts: 2,090
Thanked: 658 Times
| ![]() Diesel or petrol it all depends on what kind of performance you want for a race track may be petrol + nitro boost , but on real world crowded streets you need a lot of torque for stop and go traffic and there Diesel scores. About the test drive if you drive a Diesel car like petrol you will never enjoy it does not need to be revved up so much. Your perception for Diesel is for penny pincher will go for a toss if you look at European market. Even in India initial high cost of Diesel car ( more tax in lieu of subsidy of fuel by government ) offset the total cost of fuel during ownership until you drive it like a taxi. |
![]() |
![]() | #118 | |
Team-BHP Support ![]() ![]() | ![]() Quote:
1. European diesels are way more fuel efficient than the petrols. Think of 60 - 100% more fuel efficiency with Mercs & BMWs 2. They are quicker : The 320d is faster than the 320i, and the 530d to the 530i, E280CDI to the E280 petrol and teh C220 to the C200K. 3. With all that torque, driveability is far superior too. 4. Way more robust : European diesels are way more reliable in the longer-term than Euro petrols. 5. Euro diesels run just as well on regular diesel. Some Euro petrols require high octane fuel. 6. Resale : Any difference in acquisition price is more than taken care of at the time of resale. Example : A 2 year old 37 lakh rupee 325i goes for 18 lakh rupees in the used market, compared to 23 lakhs for the 320d. | |
![]() |
![]() | #119 | |
Senior - BHPian ![]() | ![]() Quote:
Also having driven the 530i and 530d back to back, there's no way in hell that the 530d is faster than the 530i. The diesel definitely has a stronger midrange and the torque wave when it hits is insane, however either in a straight line drag or around corners, the petrol will leave the diesel in the dust. The official figures of the 530i are 6.7 sec to 100, 26.4 sec to 1000m and 250kph(electronically limited) top speed. The corresponding figures for the 530d are 6.8 sec, 27.1 sec and 248kph. Also where does one get a 325i for 18lacs? Thats a steal ![]() | |
![]() |
![]() | #120 |
Distinguished - BHPian ![]() ![]() Join Date: May 2004 Location: Bombay
Posts: 5,871
Thanked: 4,713 Times
| ![]() Reignofchaos- the 530i gets no where close to the figured claimed on our fuel. I have smoked a friend in a 530i on multiple occasions with my 525d. So rest assured the 530d would blow it out the water. |
![]() |