I drive a Fiat Linea Petrol (FIRE) 1.4, which is naturally aspirated

. My odo has clocked close to 40,400 kms. The Fiat Petrol unit is not one of the smoothest around, and is no match for the rev-happy nature of the Honda or even Toyotas. The engine becomes harsh after 4000 rpm, and the rev limiter is at 6.5 K rpm I think. The harshness becomes particularly aggressive post 3K rpm. The engine is not very quiet at operating speeds either. Anything about 2.5 K rpm is progressive louder.
I too have the same queries as above, although I haven't seen any scientifically valid explanations in the thread so far. I don't red-line my car during driving, but do occasionally rev it to close to 6K rpm (I mean like once or twice a month, when car is in neutral, and after the engine has warmed up to operating or near-operating temperature). This is never for more than 5-6 seconds at a time, and never repeatedly. I did this especially this week, after my car was kept idle due to the Coronavirus lockdown for close to 30 days now. I start the car every alternate day, and let it run for 15 mins. I also operate the A/c for 15 mins twice a week.
Still, I am fearful about revving the car to high rpm's especially at neutral. I am worried about engine damage, damage to piston, vales, head gasket among other moving components. But I hear digressive views on this, with some enthusiast drivers recommending this too...I got the following questions to the community:
1. Is revving the car to peak RPM in neutral dangerous? The counter-idea is that there is little compressed gas in the combustion chamber to "cushion" the piston at the top of its compression stroke. Can anyone clarify this please? I read this in a VW drivers forum.
Other arguments I have read are the following:
a. High manifold vacuum at high rpm reduces the pressure over the piston as it passes over TDC is reduced so the stretch on the rods is higher at least on the power strokes and probably also on the exhaust strokes as there is little exhaust gas to displace.
b. Redline with a 4-stroke at exhaust TDC subjects the rod to max tensile loads, but running no load would likely make the former firing TDC load similar, with a slight discount of at least compression pressure * piston area. The end result would double the rate at which those max loads are accumulated. Valve train loads are not much different under power, except maybe the force required to crack open the exhaust valve.
c. When the transmission is in neutral and the engine is “revved” without any load, the spinning engine internals will accelerate, gathering rotational and lateral forces at a faster rate than designed by the manufacturer.
2. Temperature: What about problems in the cooling system? The argument is that when you rev the car in standstill, the radiator will receive less air, thus it will cool the coolant less efficiently. This means that the engine will operate in the higher threshold of temperature. Can any Senior-BHPian clarify this please?
3. Unnecessary wear issue: The engine wears is a factor of the number of revolutions it will do over its lifetime. Will this be considered in the case of my revving the engine at neutral?
4. Piston Compression Ring Expansion: Rapidly revving an engine will heat up the piston rings much faster. Because they have a much smaller thermal mass than the cylinder liners they expand at different rates. If the compression rings expand too much, they will generate increased friction on the cylinder liners, causing the cylinder liners to wear out (reducing compression). In the worst case scenario, the compression ring ends touch, pinch the cylinder liner and will most likely cause the piston to crack. On a very cold engine or while lean (not enough fuel), it is easier to get a larger thermal differentiation between the cylinder liner and piston rings. The cooling system is not able to help, as piston failure happens within 4-10 milliseconds after a hotspot develops on a piston or compression ring.
5. Oil System Starvation: The issue is that the cylinder head & block doesn’t drain the oil at the same rate that oil is pumped out of the sump, leaving the sump empty. Apparently, this is common in engines that don't have the minimum oil required. Engines that are not serviced have dirty oil systems and are prone to blockages at high rpm. This can also be caused if the block uses the same pipes to drain the oil that is also used to ventilate the sump causing oil vaporisation. (Is this applicable in contemporary Indian cars of BS-IV? ) Some poorly designed oil pumps (and water pumps too) can aerate and are unable to pump oil when increased in rpm too rapidly.
6. Connecting Rod Warping: Some con-rods will stretch/bend during excessive rpm acceleration. Worst case scenario is it will put greater unbalanced forces on the crankshaft and bearing. It will also bend valves. Can any BHPian clarrify this?
7. Crankshaft warping: The crankshaft isn’t designed to withstand a sudden increase in internal force (similar to harmonic imbalances). It only takes a thou or two (0.0254 - 0.0508 millimetres) for the crankshaft to gouge a main bearing. Taking an engine to high RPM under load (where the piston is cushioned at the top of the stroke by a large charge of fuel/air) is far better than to reach the same RPM unloaded. An unloaded engine, with a relatively small fuel/air charge, relies entirely on conrod bearings to stop the piston at the top of its stroke. in a "loaded" engine, the large charge and therefore high compression pressure, cushions the piston action.
BHPians, it will be great if someone could clarify these above concerns with suitable explanations and examples so that we don't have to rely on hear-say and personal testimonials. A good explanation would trump hunches and innuendo any day....would help me a lot as well...please!