Quote:
Originally Posted by akhilesh51 Personally, Tata is improving by leaps and bounds with every new product and the dealer network too is improving but the pace may be mismatched.
Many a times, the product is perfectly fine but negligence on the part of customer or dealer can make it go wrong and picture itself as LEMON. In this case too, I have felt much of the issues are dealer related and rest assured TML too will take the case of the dealer if it is so. |
-And just how large are the "leaps and bounds"? Your post seems to suggest an ever-upward climbing graph, which I do not think is very true.
We need to be more objective in our analysis here.
I have owned a Tata Sierra and an Indica V2 and have correlated with experiences of my colleagues of ownership of Tata vehicles - so I can state with the hindsight of some experience.
Their QA effort appears to be more like a sine-curve : periodically going up and then down again!
The
Sierra had some very incurable ills - basic design flaws such as:
- A very irritating and expensive inability to maintain the front wheels in alignment, no matter what preventive maintenance measures were taken..
- Rusting body panels (no electrostatic dip treatment).
- Poor placement of battery directly exposed to the engine compartment - the lack of of a -protective heat screen resulted invariably in even maintenance-free batteries drying up if one neglected it beyond a month or two.
-Oil leaks!
-etc, etc
The Sierra's ills could perhaps be forgiven in the overall context as it was essentially a first effort by Tata Motors.
Then came the
Indica - which was essentially a work-in-progress project. My colleague's Indica from the Pre-V2 era had some spectacular failures, including an
engine mount giving away whilst driving in city traffic, failure of electric fan, premature wear of tyres and inability to maintain wheel alignment, etc.
The
Indica V2 2002-04 models were actually a significant leap forward. I understand there were tremendous efforts made in R&D to cure the suspension related ills including wheel alignment, wear and tear issues, reliability and other problems including the engine. I understand from press releases from those times, they made genuine and effective efforts to control the production and even to great lengths to correct the production line in the event of a snag. My Indica V2 (2003 model) along with another colleague's (2004 V2 model) were fairly reliable cars, barring a few snags.
Of course, they were maintenance intensive and aged early - nevertheless they were a "leap forward".
Unfortunately, this momentum in improvements was not carried forth - the later models again had niggles coming forth.
That trend of niggles and problems appears to have increased in other types such as the Safari and Aria.
Just check out the Team-BHP threads for the same.
There are horror stories that abound here in terms of failures.
You said the Aria's tyre alignment is cured with a Rs 21/- part or mod or whatever. Well that's Deja-Vu as far as I'm concerned - this tyre alignment thing should have been a thing of the long forgotten past of the Sierra, they had solved it in the Indica V2 - why is it recurring now?
I remember asking for a test-drive of the then new Vista - the TD vehicle from the showroom had a couple of rubber bungs missing from its doors.
During a chat with the TASC advisor, I asked as to why they had not opened a FIAT servicing facility at their workshop. He had replied that FIAT had insisted in a Clean-Room to open and service the FIP of the 1.3 L MJD, whereas there was no such requirement from TATA. The same engine is used in FIAT and Tata, however the requirements are relaxed for servicing in the case of Tata vehicles. Maybe that explains in part the early ageing of Tata vehicles.
We also have a Vista as a staff car and having driven it a fair bit, I can state that although its an improvement on the Indica, I'm afraid it can't hold a candle to its contemporaries in fit or finish. As far as reliability is concerned, we will have to see.
By now, the chaps at Tata Motors should have learnt the Art and Science of productionalising their designs with near bullet-proof reliablity, instead of repeating their mistakes again.
Its not just a case of too little too late. Its a problem of repeating the same mistakes again as if in a roller coaster of a sine-curve cycle.