Background 1
For the last few months, I wanted to upgrade from my DZire ZDI to something more premium. Don't get me wrong - the 1.3 MJD is one of the finest small capacity diesels that I have driven. It's decently refined, flexible and extremely frugal nature makes it one of the top performers in it's segment. On the DZire, it was perfectly tuned with the right gear ratios. But it was lacking many of the features provided by newer cars. So...
The top requirements were:
- Diesel engine - for the torque!
- Good NVH levels, absolutely no truck-like engine noise
- Hassle free Sales and Service
- Plush interiors with a good set of features
The cars that were in my budget were:
- Hyundai Verna
- Honda City
- Skoda Rapid
- Volkswagen Vento
- Maruti Ciaz
Disclaimer: Please excuse me if I'm a little critical of any cars in this topic. It's only for comparison purposes, and my personal opinion with no intention to offend
Honda City and Volkswagen Vento were rejected due to noisy and unpleasant sounding engines. Skoda Rapid was rejected due to horror stories about service. I heard that it has improved a lot now, thanks but no thanks! That left me with Maruti Ciaz and Hyundai Verna.
Background 2
Around November 2014, I took a test drive of the Maruti Ciaz ZDI. The verdict was:
Yes, it's quite underpowered for this segment, but not as bad as I thought it would be. But when you pay the wrong side of 10Lakhs, a 90BHP output is simply unacceptable. Refinement was much better than in the Swift/DZire/Vento/etc, though - and the engine sound was likeable at higher RPMs.
To compare another car when the memory was fresh, I immediately went to the Hyundai showroom and test drove the Hyundai Verna 2014 (I was aware that a lot of issues from the previous generation were fixed/improved in 2014). I was simply blown away by the refinement and the torque. The engine sounded sweet and raspy at higher RPMs. Also, with 4 people on board, we did not scrape any high road bumps too. The steering was a little too light though. While it was good in the city, I could imagine how it would be on the highway.
I was also aware that a facelift was on the cards. The sales executive confirmed that it will be launched in the middle of February 2015, so I thought it was prudent to wait. He was bang on target about the dates.
Test drive of the Verna facelift
By the 2nd week of February 2015, reviews of the Verna facelift started appearing on various websites, much before the official launch. From these, I came to the conclusion that the steering and handling package was no longer a deal breaker. Called the showroom the day after the facelift was launched on February 18. They already had the new facelift on display, so went there to take a look. No surprises there. I liked the looks of the facelift much more than the previous generation - it looked more 'mature' (for lack of a better word). Of course, this is quite subjective. A lot of people in various reviews mentioned that they liked the looks of the old one better.
Did multiple test drives over the next couple of days. Even at high 2-digit speeds, it did not feel nervous at all. Since I'm not somebody who rips every corner at 150Kmph, and all I needed was a good 3-digit speed cruiser, I felt that this was the car for me.
I also test drove the Vento just to cover all my bases. Though I heard that they had improved the NVH, it was still noisier than my threshold. With the windows open, it sounded like a truck, but with the windows closed, insulation was decent. The interiors were bland, though good in quality. In addition, it had a horribly annoyingly high rear middle seat hump. I also felt that the suspension was a little too stiff for city driving. Didn't get a chance to try out on the highway, but I take others' word that it is one of the best in class there.
After some deliberations, decided to go for the Hyundai Verna
Since safety features (read 6 airbags) were one of the top priorities, I decided to go for the top end 1.6 SX CRDI. After all, what's a few thousands more if safety is non-negotiable?
Booking experience
In one word - excellent. The showroom was clean, and did not seem chaotic compared to two Maruti showrooms I can think of. The formalities were completed without any fuss, within 15 minutes. Delivery date was mentioned as 10 days.
Price
Absolutely no discounts were being offered across Hyundai showrooms. Saved around 20k by taking the bumper-to-bumper insurance myself, and that too simply by walking into the New India Assurance office, where they straightaway gave me a 40% discount on their base price. The showroom was charging 48K for bumper-to-bumper insurance, whereas I ended up paying 28K for the same. I'm sure I could have shaved off a few more thousands had I bargained across agents.
Delivery
The car was ready within 10 days of booking. Did the standard stockyard inspection, and the rest of the works as per team-bhp's excellent checklist. Also made hefty savings of almost 40% on insurance by taking it on my own, thanks again to team-bhp.
The delivery process was excellent and smooth, with a memorable hand over process.
Initial feedback summary: Positives- Refinement, refinement and then some more refinement! - Even in a quiet area, the engine on the inside sounds like a ticking clock, a purring kitten, or a knife through butter, once warmed up. Take your pick
. After the first service, it's even better. - Suspension is no longer an issue - more on this later
- Great acceleration - though you don't feel it due to a quiet engine. There are times where I was at around 3000 RPM without even realizing it. There's no sudden surge at 2000 RPM a.la the 1.3 MJD in the Swift. Here, the acceleration starts around 1500 RPM and progress thereafter is effortless and brisk
- Superb city ride quality - the potholes are dismissed without any fuss or thuds
- Plush interiors, classy dashboard lights
- Excellent front seat comfort - fits snugly around you
- Rear head room and leg room are good - this was not really covered in any of the reviews. Being reasonably tall at 5'10", I still had a couple of inches of head room at the rear. Even with the front seat pushed back to the extent of what I use for driving, the rear leg room is good
- Brakes are not spongy - though the test drive car felt a little more spongier. I guess it's just a matter of getting used to it. Braking power was good
- Pretty good sound/audio quality, given that it's an OEM
- Bluetooth phone connectivity works well, pairs without problems every time
- Decently good stock headlamps - I don't think most of the people will need an upgrade
- Excellent steering in the city - effortless to use
- Improved GC/suspension - not hit humps yet with full load, touch wood.
Negatives- Steering is inconsistent at 3 digit speeds - Though I did not find this a deal breaker at all. Can be gotten used to.
- Switching off the engine immediately unlocks the doors. I would have expected it to go to the ACC mode, without unlocking the doors
- Most of the interiors are beige - will be a dirt magnet
- No rear a/c vents - this is a big disadvantage and is sorely missed. Many times, the front is pleasant but the rear is warm. The A/c itself is excellent though in terms of cooling.
- Gearing a little too tall for city use - At 1000 RPM on the 1st gear, you will hit close to 10 Kmph (compared to 8kmph for the 1.3 MJD). The engine simply pulls away, so unless you half clutch, you cannot drive in crawling traffic.
- Rear under thigh support could have been better - this will be an issue only for taller people
- No maps/navigation touch screen support - not a big deal personally for me. I plan to upgrade to one of the factory fit aftermarkets later.
- Poor choice of colours - where are the classy browns, blues, burgundies and other colours that even the A segment cars have?
Showroom service manager talk
I just wanted to find out the rationale behind some of the issues faced with the earlier Verna, so I was talking to the service manager. His answers made me laugh. They would have passed off easily on an unsuspecting customer, but being a regular team-bhp reader

, it didn't work on me.
Me: Why was the earlier suspension so soft
Him: Sir, Verna is a luxury car, so people need high levels of comfort, so we made it soft
Me: So such people don't drive on highways?
Him: <no answer>
Me: Why do you still not give rear a/c vents?
Him: Sir, Verna has an aerodynamic design, where the cold air just flows all around, so we don't need rear a/c vents. We did not receive any feedback that this is required.
Me: Huh? Then why do you give it in Grand i10 and XCent new launches? (and thinking to myself - I expected a smarter answer from you!)
Him: <no answer>
Me: Why still no touch screen navigation?
Him: Sir, no Hyundai car has it!
Me: So? Others are giving it. Is it a waste?
Him: <no answer>
Wheel alignment
After driving for a few days, I felt that the car was going too straight unnaturally - i.e even on sharper left/right gradients, it was not pulling to the left/right. A wheel alignment analysis showed wrong values for the toe! This was surprising, since I expected new cars to be aligned perfectly. Fixed this, and everything was perfect after that.
Question: Do manufacturers give a negative toe to new cars to achieve the "straightline" effect? Anyway, I would advise new car buyers to immediately do a wheel alignment after delivery. Probably this should be added to the delivery checklist.