Quote:
Originally Posted by McLaren Rulez Look at it this way. If Hamilton had broken a rule, he should have gotten a drive through. Renault, after the race, criticized him but again did not protest formally. That's because he didn't break any rule. The warning could only then be because he's in a grey area of the rules. I posted about this after the race. That's what I think about the incident. |
I repeat this again! Its not in the FIA rule book for F1. But, this is something agreed between the drivers during the pre-race driver meet headed by the FIA. It all stopped with a warning for the same reason. Quote:
You are talking from a spectator's point of view. But a driver's job is to keep his competition behind him at all costs. Why wouldn't he do what he did, then?
|
If it was just a spectator's point of view, why was he offered a warning by the FIA. It was against an agreement between the drivers before the race and he was warned for breaking the agreement only to stay in front for position. If every driver breaks this agreement to stay in front it will be demolition derby and not F1. Quote:
In fact, any driver would have done that if they realized they wouldn't be punished.
|
Remember David Ryan who was sent out for Hamilton doing everything on track to stay in front? Not the first time really. Quote:
He's eight points off the leader after three races in a second rate car despite two monumental strategic blunders. That's pretty cool if you ask me.
|
Pretty cool!? There is a driver leading the table without a single win and was nothing but crap on the track. Do I really need to figure out for you on which driver is cool or what is rather cool!? |