Quote:
Originally Posted by guyonblackybx Yeah It does :P Thats why I like to create HDRs.
That makes sense. I mean when person doesn't want to take pain of changing settings to get a good shot, why would he take pain of editing a RAW file? As a manufacturer I wud thinkg on same lines |
There are situations where out in the open, there is no time to decide the best ISO+exposure+aperture+white balance.
you'd want to keep your attention on purely composing.
you would also want the maximum amount of data that the camera can pick up.
for example, that last pic which is cropped weird, it had already started to rain, and i could not afford to get the camera wet, so I squeezed off a shot in auto mode and ran back to the car. if only it had been in RAW- I would have had a lot more room to maneuver.
the crop and composition were already planned as soon as i saw the scene, but because the light was changing so fast, I had no prev Exposure setting that could be relied upon to give a good result, and I'm not an expert to guess which setting would be best under those condition(I hope it will come with practice) i had time for one hurried shot in manual focus and then I had to escape.
I came back to the same spot about 2hrs later, but the scene looked very different(disappointing)
Last edited by rippergeo : 28th July 2008 at 12:04.
|