Quote:
Originally Posted by sparkguy I can see you are thinking to buy 3 different lenses. | Quote:
Originally Posted by teknophobia No need to go in for any more lenses at this time. |
[quote=CrAzY dRiVeR;1947289
1. 2 years later is when i would be able to upgrade.[/QUOTE] Quote:
Originally Posted by phamilyman My honest suggestion is to buy a used 40D. |
I recently got to compare the 40D to the 550D with my 17-55IS, 70-200/2.8IS and the 18-55IS.
The 550D and I assume 450/500/1000D are a total misfit for the bigger lenses. If I was not supporting the 17-55 and 70-200 on the 550D with my left hand the camera used to loose commucation with them. My 40D does not I guess the x00 and x000 bodies do not have the studryness in the mouting apartus to work efficiently with the big 77mm lenses.
When working on a DSLR system I will post what I PMed a fellow BHPian earlier today. I am not an expert or professional. I just follow common sense.
If you are looking at getting into a DSLR system you have to realise that you should be willing to build a system than purchase a "Full" system from day one like you get with a P&S.
a. Think IS/VR lenses atlest for the zooms and telephoto lenses
b. you will upgrade your system, even if you think you wont, trust me you will so best prepare for this and Start SLOW.
For 25K you can get the Canon 1000D/18-55IS or Nikon 3000/18-55VR lens.
Consider adding lenses like the 55-250IS and 50/1.8 later.
For a bit more (about 40K) you can get the D5000 with the 18-105VR lens which I really like as you can later add a 70-300VR and 50/1.8 and get a very nice system. B&H Photo Video Digital Cameras, Photography, Camcorders
Similarly the Canon T2i (550) with 18-135 is a much nicer place to start if you can afford it. B&H Photo Video Digital Cameras, Photography, Camcorders
I stay away from MOST kits as the accessories these kits offer are terrible. The bags and DVD guides etc...are a little less than useless and a good bag from Kata (my favourite), Tamrac or LowePro is much preferred.
When I bought my system I worked backwards.
1. What was the subjects I shot most? Under what conditions?
In my case it was children; often in low light (indoors).
2. Which lenses will let me best perfrom this function?
In my case a f/2.8 lens with IS that covered 24-100mm - the cloesest lens I could afford was the 17-55IS (28- 90mm) from Canon.
3. Which body best works with this lens - for example the 17-55 is so heavy that it needs support to operate with the 550D so you need a 40D/50D body for this lens as well as other big tele lenses like the 70-200/2.8IS, 300/2.8, and 100-400/4-5.6IS.
Once i had this system in mind I called 2 friends who are professionals and asked them. Both told me that I should think full frame and get the 5D+24-105 combo instead but that is where common sense comes in.
My professional friends make huge blow ups and need as big a sensor as possible. I do not. A APS-C sensor is adequare for most of us. A big sensor means the lenses gotta be bigger too and bigger lenses are much more expensive. I got the 40D and 17-55IS.
Hope this helps.
While some 3rd party lenses from Sigma (100-300/4 if only it had OS) and Tokina (16-50/2.8, 50-135/2.8 and 11-16/2.8 none of which have IS/VR/VC/OS) etc.. are good I have had poor experience with all 3 brands (incl Tamron) - a Sigma 30/1.4 soft focussed, a Tamrom 70-300 used to hunt when lesser lenses did not, and the Tokina 16-135 DX was just terrible - it was soft almost through it's range and had a very small sweet spot (f/8 only).
Most Super zooms are a compromise. The one that is an exception is the Canon 28-300/3.5-5.6 and this one is terribly expensive. I hope they make better/cheaper super zooms as the market for these expands but in short they are all a compromise.
Last edited by navin : 22nd June 2010 at 10:51.
|