![]() | |
Originally Posted by R2D2
(Post 3057315)
The 70-200 F4 has been released. It's priced @ an MRP ~84K (cannot remember the exact price) though the price hasn't been updated on Nikon's website. I got this MRP from a dealer. Update: The new 80-400 AF-S VR II is priced at INR 179,950 about 8K more than the 70-200 2.8 VR II. Availability is end March onwards. |
Originally Posted by amrisharm
(Post 3056762)
Hi guys, I just came across the below pic on fb and was blown away by the clarity of it considering it was taken in low light in the middle of the night...... |
Originally Posted by JackSparrow90
(Post 3057647)
Hi, I have a friend coming over from USA and im thinking of asking him to purchase this bundle. http://www.ebay.com/itm/USA-Canon-T4...item257834b2fc I have decided on the camera and lens but just wondering if i should go for the whole bundle or just buy the lenses and camera and buy the rest locally (Bangalore). I'm still a beginner to DSLR photography by the way. Hoping for some advice. Thanks Sanjith |
Originally Posted by R2D2
(Post 3057692)
Camera body warranties are local only. So a camera purchased in the US thru an authorized US dealer will be covered under warranty only in that country. I assume this eBay dealer is legit and authorized. Please check. I am not sure why you aren't buying this kit (AKA Canon EOS 650D in India and rest of the world) locally? Forget the freebies in the kit.. local support is more important. |
Originally Posted by JackSparrow90
(Post 3057713)
Well, in Bangalore the cheapest i could find for body + kit lens (18-55) + 55-250mm IS II was Rs 68,000. The above deal is for 810$, 54.85 x 810 = 44,428. So id be saving about 20k. My friend visits US quite often, so warranty not a problem just in case ,right ? |
Originally Posted by R2D2
(Post 3057993)
Well, only you can decide if you want to forego the warranty. Depending on a friend/relative to ship a faulty camera overseas and back is a bit of a long shot in my opinion. So I would not buy abroad and most certainly never from eBay. But it's down to individual choice. Can't blame you though as 20K is a big saving. Good luck and hope you enjoy the camera! |
Originally Posted by JackSparrow90
(Post 3057647)
Hi, I have a friend coming over from USA and im thinking of asking him to purchase this bundle. http://www.ebay.com/itm/USA-Canon-T4...item257834b2fc I have decided on the camera and lens but just wondering if i should go for the whole bundle or just buy the lenses and camera and buy the rest locally (Bangalore). I'm still a beginner to DSLR photography by the way. Hoping for some advice. Thanks Sanjith |
Originally Posted by skartik2
(Post 3057714)
does anybody have experience in buying from keh.com? How is the customs procedure on used items? |
Originally Posted by amrisharm
(Post 3056762)
Hi guys, I just came across the below pic on fb and was blown away by the clarity of it considering it was taken in low light in the middle of the night. The picture description mentions it was taken by a Nikon D600 and the shutter was left open for 42 seconds. Its common knowledge that the Nikon D600 is a Full Frame (Fx) camera. So my question to the experts is, would i be able to get clarity somewhere close to this from a Dx format camera using the right lenses? Lets say from a Nikon D5100 or a D7000? I am specifically asking with regards to low light photography as is the case with the picture below. I know fx cameras are in a league of their own so i am not expecting dx cameras to give me same quality pics, but I would like to know how far down are dx cameras compared to fx cameras when shooting in very low light? Lets assume that on a scale of 1-10 the Fx camera is a 10, then where would a D5100 score comparatively speaking? Any info would be of great help Thanks. (Note: below pic has been downsized for uploading) Image source: http://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fb...type=1&theater Attachment 1058306 |
Originally Posted by Safari_Beast
(Post 3058972)
Hello all, I am getting nikon d7000 today, i was thinking of taking only body and tamron 17-50 lens without VC. So nikon users can anybody tell me is it worth taking d7000 with kit lens 18-105 or tamron option will be good. Which lens will be good for everyday use which can take good pictures under low light as well. Thanks in advance. |
Originally Posted by joslicx
(Post 3059030)
VR is quite useful (esp as 18-105 is a travel zoom) and Nikon D7000 does not have in body stabilization so go with the nikkor lens I'd say. In fact dont buy as kit, instead pick a used one (search on forums like jjmehta. Lot of people jettison their kit lens so very high chance of coming across one in your city) |
Originally Posted by Safari_Beast
(Post 3058972)
I am getting nikon d7000 today, i was thinking of taking only body and tamron 17-50 lens without VC. So nikon users can anybody tell me is it worth taking d7000 with kit lens 18-105 or tamron option will be good. Which lens will be good for everyday use which can take good pictures under low light as well. Thanks in advance. |
Originally Posted by Safari_Beast
(Post 3058972)
Hello all, I am getting nikon d7000 today, i was thinking of taking only body and tamron 17-50 lens without VC. So nikon users can anybody tell me is it worth taking d7000 with kit lens 18-105 or tamron option will be good. Which lens will be good for everyday use which can take good pictures under low light as well. Thanks in advance. |
All times are GMT +5.5. The time now is 14:50. | |