[quote=Delta Wing;1802178][quote]
Would you say what you have been saying if it were your Nano that was burning? Families losing jobs, man, you make it sound so dramatic. But fat chance of that happening in this country where Warrren Anderson can get away with the worst ever industrial disaster at Bhopal. Why even bring a distant and sentimental issue like people losing their jobs when we are discussing preliminaries of the incident of a car on fire, as if livelihoods under threat were a valid excuse against retribution for possible manufacturing defects? For the fact that nobody ever was hurt physically by a Nano I think you make it sound so dramatic! And things like complete towns losing heir jobs have happened and are still happening. No economy is safe. I can't undo what happened in Bhopal. All I can do is help preventig other incidents happening to prevent repeating such incidents. What you fail to understand is that ranting is not getting anyone anywhere. How much ranting was done when the Union Carbide desaster happened? A hell of a lot. What was the result? Nothing. Whatever you are coming up with you just prove my point, which you don't want to see. Not a single person of over one billion people in India do know the exact cause of the fire. But everyone blames Tata from the word 'go'. All the big ranters speak about Tata in an unacceptable manner, claiming that they wouldn't do anything, despite having no evidence. The investigation has sarted before some of the ranters even knew about the fire. Still they are running down Tata for doing nothing. Despite the fact that they are clearly wrong the would go on. Of course they would never apologise, but expect from everyone else to apologise. Is this the way to deal with people? Not the way my parents brought me up.
That is wrong definitely but given the consumer protection in this country, a little pressure does not hurt. So long as Tata do the investigation and produce safety assurances to avoid more fires, it is fine. What has consumer protection to do with Tata? Tata is not the government. If Tata has bodged your pressure leads to shooting yourself in the foot without consumer protection. Sort the consumer protection and any company bodging can be held at ransom. Action is needed, not ranting. While you are going against Tata, when it should be the authorities that you should sort, the people in the authorities laughing because they get away. But then you are the ones who have elected the government. So, you are the ones that can get them out of power if they aren't acting in the interest of the public.
That someone is me and I stick to my conviction because have seen my share of complicated accidents and the investigations with the results. I have seen enough investigations that were wound up in the way you describe and later it turned out that the conclusions were wrong, which led to more people dying. If you are willing to take the risk - that is up to you. I personally would not risk it.
Utterance of technical words like 'chemical analysis' and 'other procedures' does not take them longer to complete. It took 2 years to figure out why the Air France Concorde had its fatal take off. Experts came to many conclusions. They had video evidence, they had a flight recorder, they had maintainance records, the planes wer regularly inspected, they had all the experience with wear and tear and the flaws of the construction. In many other aircraft incidents it is the same story. If it were all so easy and everything wound up in not time then the ever increasing list of re-calls wouldn't exist in the first place.
It is the corporate excuse to shove things out of public memory by delaying things. Of course people will do it and have done since the dawn of civilisation.
People will jump up and down all they want at any time, who are you to tell people otherwise, considering your jumping rants against Toyota and Mercedes? Again you are wrong. I am not telling people to not jump up and down. I am against false accusations! Jumping up and down on false accusations is wrong, immoral and self defeating. Junp up and down when it is the right time. And then it should be done in an effective way. Or do you think that your jumping up and down is effective? You mentioned Bhopal and claim nothing has happened to the guilty ones. Why hasn't anythinjg changed since? Because your jumping up and down is predictable. Every authority and institution has got a plan 'in the drawer' to get out of this predictable situation.
It's fine in US where the govt has more stringent norms for carmakers but in India, unless people jump, many or most deviations would go unnoticed, let alone accounted. Sort the government to sort the laws and regulations. Jumping at the Nano won't change the manufacturers ways if they need changing.
People will jump about the Nano, because it is hailed as the people's car whereas issues with a Merceds or a Honda might not cause so much of public outcry since half the Indian public wouldn't even know and care for these brands. The Nano is quite an achievement. You claim to care, but at the same time run Tata down on things you don't even know exactly what they are doing. This sounds to me like a headless chicken. Where is the agenda? You are trying to fight a battle and don't even know were it is!
Declaring and making the world's cheapest car is a double edged sword with laurels for the effort and lashings for the smallest failures and like it or not, Tata will have to face it. Ratan Tata can today close its factories and live very comfortable till th end of his life and never needs to bend a finger again for work and this would be the same several generations down. His future is a lot safer in this respect than any of ours. If you run down Tata you are bound to lose because it affects your economy. This is what we have to face.
So rather than bashing members of the forum just for the sake of putting them down for their rightful opinions, it would be appreciated if people could present more facts about this incident, if they know them. I have no problem with opinions. I have a problem when people try to sell opinions as facts. And I have a big problem with false statement and wrong accusations. My parents have lived through the worst regime of all times, which was governed by wrong accusations leading to over 2,500 concentration camps murdering milions after millions of people! Unfortunately the ranters did not present facts, which certainly does not aid the project Nano.
To repeat my first post, we need to chill and let some preliminary investigation be completed before taking sides. Before that, it is rather pointless to either defend/attack Tata or the Nano. It shouldn't be a matter of attacking or defending the Nano. Either people are constructive or they should better be silent. Concerns are constructive, ranting is not. Ranting is something for people that do not act. But people that are constructive do act. The Nano is not perfect and never will be as no other product ever will be. It certainly ha got flaws, but constructive arguments make it a better car. The ranters don't give it a real chance. The ones proven wrong regarding Tata not doing anything have not even accepted that they are wrong. Are they really helping a great (even if it is ambitious) project to succeed? |